Home Current Issue Previous Issues For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January/February 2007 - Volume 12 - Issue 1 > Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Versus Core Needle Biopsy in...
Pathology Case Reviews:
doi: 10.1097/01.pcr.0000252856.19283.3f
Case Review

Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Versus Core Needle Biopsy in the Evaluation of Thyroid and Salivary Gland Lesions

Elsheikh, Tarik M. MD*; Singh, Harsharan K. MD†; Silverman, Jan F. MD‡

Collapse Box

Abstract

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is widely accepted as the initial diagnostic tool of choice in the evaluation of thyroid and salivary gland tumors. FNA, however, has some limitations which have recently led a few investigators to advocate the use of core needle biopsy (CNB) as an alternative to FNA. The development of fine-gauge, single-action, spring-loaded biopsy needles has greatly facilitated image-guided biopsy of head and neck lesions. These modern CNBs, under ultrasound guidance, may be helpful in cases where FNA diagnosis has been initially rendered “unsatisfactory” or found to be discrepant with the clinical findings. Although in recent literature CNB appears to be well tolerated and has a low incidence of complications, it is still not commonly used in the routine assessment of thyroid and salivary gland lesions. FNA is likely to, and should, remain as the screening tool of choice in assessing these lesions. Ultrasound-guided CNB should not be seen as a competitor to FNA but rather as a complementary investigational tool.

© 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.