Otology & Neurotology

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2008 - Volume 29 - Issue 4 > Cochlear Implantation in Atelectasis and Chronic Otitis Medi...
Otology & Neurotology:
June 2008 - Volume 29 - Issue 4 - pp 499-501
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31816a8986
Cochlear Implants

Cochlear Implantation in Atelectasis and Chronic Otitis Media: Long-Term Follow-Up

Xenellis, John; Nikolopoulos, Thomas P.; Marangoudakis, Pavlos; Vlastarakos, Petros V.; Tsangaroulakis, Antonios; Ferekidis, Eleftherios

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To report the long-term results of cochlear implantation in cases with chronic otitis media or atelectasis using a single surgical technique performed in a single cochlear implant center.

Patients: Nine patients who were implanted using the blind-pit closure of the external ear canal technique (4 patients with adhesive otitis media and 5 with radical mastoid cavities). Follow-up ranged from 18 months to 12 years (mean, 7.05 yr).

Intervention: The surgical procedure was performed in 2 stages. The first stage included canal wall down or lowering any high facial ridge in previous mastoidectomies, removal of all skin, and blind-pit closure of the external ear canal without mastoid cavity obliteration or eustachian tube obliteration. Cochlear implantation was performed 6 months after the first surgical procedure.

Results: All operations were uneventful, and during cochlear implantation, as a second stage, no epithelia or other problems were encountered. No serious complications were encountered during the follow-up period. One case had a minor disruption of the external canal closure that was reclosed successfully under local anesthesia. All patients were using the device at the last follow-up interval with no device problems.

Conclusion: Blind-sac closure of the external ear canal without obliteration is a rather safe surgical procedure in cases with chronic otitis media or atelectasis. Meticulous surgical technique and proper patient selection are of paramount importance. However, a 2-stage procedure may not always be necessary andmight best be confined to those patients who have active inflammatory disease at the primary procedure.

© 2008 Otology & Neurotology, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.