To raise awareness of the potential hazard of auricular burns associated with operating microscope use during otologic surgery.
Retrospective case series and summary of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database of voluntary adverse event reports pertaining to microscope related auricular thermal injuries.
All patients who sustained auricular burns while using the operating microscope during otologic surgery at 2 tertiary academic referral centers.
Surgical procedure, microscope model, intensity of illumination, length of procedure, focal length, location and severity of burn, and patient outcome.
A total of 4 microscope-related auricular thermal injuries were identified from the authors’ institutions. Additionally, 82 unique cases of soft tissue burns associated with the use of an operative microscope have been voluntarily reported to the FDA since 2004. A disproportionately large percent (∼30%) of these occurred within the field of otology, the majority of which were during tympanoplasty or tympanomastoidectomy procedures at focal length distances of 300 mm or less with xenon light source microscopes.
Simultaneous advancements in light delivery technologies and lens optics have continued to improve the efficiency of the operating microscope; however, these improvements also increase the potential for thermal injuries. Although rare, a review of the FDA MAUDE database suggests that microscope-related soft tissue burns occur more frequently in otology than any other surgical specialty. A variety of factors may help explain this finding, including the unique anatomy of the external ear with thin skin and limited underlying adipose tissue. Preventative measures should be taken to decrease the risk of thermal injuries including use of the lowest comfortable light intensity, adjusting the aperture width to match the operative field, frequent wound irrigation, and covering exposed portions of the pinna with a moist surgical sponge.
*Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee; and †Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to David S. Haynes, M.D., Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Bill Wilkerson Center for Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, 7209 Medical Center East, South Tower 1215 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232-8605; E-mail: email@example.com
No funding or other support was required for this study.
The authors disclose no conflicts of interest.
Mayo Clinic IRB Approval: 13-001989. Vanderbilt University IRB Approval: 130377.