Optometry & Vision Science

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2009 - Volume 86 - Issue 7 > Validation of the Visual Disability Questionnaire (VDQ) in I...
Optometry and Vision Science:
July 2009 - Volume 86 - Issue 7 - pp E826-E835
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ae1b3f
Original Article

Validation of the Visual Disability Questionnaire (VDQ) in India

Marella, Manjula; Gothwal, Vijaya K.; Pesudovs, Konrad; Lamoureux, Ecosse

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose. To validate visual disability questionnaire (VDQ) in patients with low vision in India, and explore whether the two latent traits importance and difficulty associated with performance of daily activities are valid and independent constructs.

Methods. The VDQ consisting of 25 items was administered verbally to 137 subjects with low vision aged 16 to 89 years. Responses for each item were rated for importance and difficulty using a 5-category Likert scale. Rasch analysis was used to estimate interval measures of response ratings.

Results. Subjects could discriminate only three response categories for importance and difficulty. Content validity was demonstrated by good separation indices for importance (4.24 and 2.59 for the item and person parameters, respectively) and difficulty ratings (7.64 and 3.33, respectively). High reliability scores were recorded for importance (0.95 and 0.87) and difficulty ratings (0.98 and 0.92). The most important items were grooming (1.15 logits) and reading newspaper (0.97 logits). Although threading a needle was the least important item (-2.79 logits), it was the most difficult task (3.13 logits). The least difficult item was moving around in familiar places (-2.51 logits). A poor correlation was observed between the item measures (r = -0.19, p = 0.34) and also between person measures (r = 0.18, p = 0.03) of importance and difficulty.

Conclusions. The VDQ is a valid questionnaire with importance and difficulty ratings found to be independent constructs. This questionnaire could be used to prioritize the goals for rehabilitation intervention in patients with low vision.

© 2009 American Academy of Optometry

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.