You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Validation of an iPad Test of Letter Contrast Sensitivity

Kollbaum, Pete S.*; Jansen, Meredith E.; Kollbaum, Elli J.; Bullimore, Mark A.§

Optometry & Vision Science:
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000158
Original Articles
Abstract

Purpose: An iPad-based letter contrast sensitivity test was developed (ridgevue.com) consisting of two letters on each page of an iBook. The contrast decreases from 80% (logCS = 0.1) to 0.5% (logCS = 2.3) by 0.1 log units per page. The test was compared to the Pelli-Robson Test and the Freiburg Acuity and Contrast Test.

Methods: Twenty normally sighted subjects and 20 low-vision subjects were tested monocularly at 1 m using each test wearing their habitual correction. After a 5-minute break, subjects were retested with each test in reverse order. Two different letter charts were used for both the Pelli-Robson and iPad tests, and the order of testing was varied systematically. For the Freiburg test, the target was a variable contrast Landolt C presented at eight possible orientations and used a 30-trial Best PEST procedure. Repeatability and agreement were assessed by determining the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) ±1.96 SD of the differences between administrations or tests.

Results: All three tests showed good repeatability in terms of the 95% LoA: iPad = ±0.19, Pelli-Robson = ±0.19, and Freiburg = ±0.15. The iPad test showed good agreement with the Freiburg test with similar mean (±SD) logCS (iPad = 1.98 ± 0.11, Freiburg = 1.96 ± 0.06) and with narrow 95% LoA (±0.24), but the Pelli-Robson test gave significantly lower values (1.65 ± 0.04). Low-vision subjects had slightly poorer repeatability (iPad = ±0.24, Pelli-Robson = ±0.23, Freiburg = ±0.21). Agreement between the iPad and Freiburg tests was good (iPad = 1.45 ± 0.40, Freiburg = 1.54 ± 0.37), but the Pelli-Robson test gave significantly lower values (1.30 ± 0.30).

Conclusions: The iPad test showed similar repeatability and may be a rapid and convenient alternative to some existing measures. The Pelli-Robson test gave lower values than the other tests.

Author Information

*OD, PhD, FAAO

OD, MS, FAAO

OD, FAAO

§MCOptom, PhD, FAAO

School of Optometry (PSK, MEJ, EJK), Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana; and College of Optometry (MAB), University of Houston, Houston, Texas.

Mark A. Bullimore 356 Ridgeview Lane Boulder Colorado 80302 e-mail: bullers2020@gmail.com.

© 2014 American Academy of Optometry