Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2014 - Volume 91 - Issue 2 > Ethnic Differences in Undercorrected Refractive Error in Asi...
Optometry & Vision Science:
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000140
Original Articles

Ethnic Differences in Undercorrected Refractive Error in Asians

Pan, Chen-Wei*; Chiang, Peggy Pei-Chia; Wong, Tien Y.*; Zheng, Ying-Feng; Chew, Merwyn; Saw, Seang-Mei§; Lamoureux, Ecosse L.; Cheng, Ching-Yu*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the ethnic variations in the prevalence and risk factors for undercorrected refractive error and its impact on vision-specific functioning (VF) in a multiethnic Asian population.

Methods

A total of 3353 Chinese, 3400 Indians, and 3280 Malays in Singapore participated in this population-based cross-sectional study. Distance presenting visual acuity (VA) was measured using a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution number chart. Best-corrected VA was assessed using the same test protocol as presenting VA. Undercorrected refractive error was defined as an improvement of at least 0.2 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (two lines equivalent) in the best-corrected VA compared with the presenting VA in the better eye when presenting VA was less than 20/40 in the better eye. The VF-11 questionnaire measured participants’ VF. Multivariate linear regression was performed to assess the impact of undercorrected refractive error on the overall VF score.

Results

Regardless of ethnicity, participants with undercorrected refractive error had a reduction in VF score compared to those with normal vision in both eyes. The overall prevalence of undercorrected refractive error was highest in Indians (25.1%), followed by Malays (22.2%) and Chinese (19.7%). Undercorrected refractive error was less common in spectacles or contact lenses wearers than in non–spectacle wearers or non–contact lenses wearers. Adults with mild to moderate refractive errors were most likely to have undercorrected refractive error (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, increasing age (p < 0.001), Indian race (p < 0.001), lower education level (p < 0.001) or poorer housing (p < 0.001), having refractive errors (p < 0.001), and not wearing optical corrections (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with increasing undercorrected refractive error.

Conclusions

In Singapore, undercorrected refractive error is most prevalent in Indians and least prevalent in Chinese. The impact of undercorrected refractive error on VF was consistent across all three ethnicities. There may be higher barriers to visual correction among Malays or Indians compared with Chinese in Singapore.

Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Optometry

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.