Optometry & Vision Science

Skip Navigation LinksHome > November 2012 - Volume 89 - Issue 11 > Predisposing Factors for Solution-Induced Corneal Staining
Optometry & Vision Science:
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31826ca27e
Original Articles

Predisposing Factors for Solution-Induced Corneal Staining

Young, Graeme*; Canavan, Kristy; Jones, Susanna; Hunt, Chris§

Collapse Box


Purpose: To evaluate predisposing factors in subjects susceptible to solution-induced corneal staining (SICS).

Methods: Four hundred forty-six existing soft contact lens wearers were randomly fitted with one of two study lenses (lotrafilcon B, CIBA Vision, or omafilcon A, CooperVision) and used a hydrogen peroxide care system (Clear Care, CIBAVision) for a 1-month period. Each subject was then challenged with the same lenses presoaked in a multipurpose solution (ReNu MultiPlus, Bausch & Lomb) and assessed after approximately 2 h to be categorized as either “stainers” or “non-stainers” based on whether they showed a classic SICS pattern (diffuse punctate corneal staining in three or more peripheral quadrants).

Results: Overall, 36% (155 of 425) of eligible subjects were classified as stainers and included a higher proportion of omafilcon wearers: 44% (91 of 205) vs. 29% (64 of 220). After using the peroxide system, the stainers were more likely to show poorer wetting (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76, p = 0.02) compared with the non-stainers. Lens wetting showed a significant negative correlation with film deposits (r = −0.63, p < 0.0001, n = 425). Furthermore, on slit lamp examination, the stainers were more likely to show higher levels of upper- and lower-palpebral hyperemia (OR = 2.18, p = 0.02; OR = 1.93, p = 0.04), tarsal roughness (OR = 1.71, p = 0.01), corneal staining (OR = 17.1, p < 0.0001), and conjunctival staining (OR = 1.94, p = 0.004). Although not exposed to preservatives, twice as many eyes in the stainers group had some level of corneal staining: 51% vs. 25%. There were no significant differences between the stainers and non-stainers with respect to age, sex, refraction, or keratometry (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: This study highlighted some notable trends in patients susceptible to SICS. The findings point toward poor tear quality as a predisposing factor for SICS.

© 2012 American Academy of Optometry


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.