Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Using the Freiburg Acuity and Contrast Test to Measure Visual Performance in USAF Personnel After PRK

DENNIS, RICHARD J. OD, MS, FAAO; BEER, JEREMY M. A. PhD; BALDWIN, J. BRUCE OD, PhD, FAAO; IVAN, DOUGLAS J. MD; LORUSSO, FRANK J. MD; THOMPSON, WILLIAM T. BS

Articles: Original Article

Purpose. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) may be an alternative to spectacle and contact lens wear for United States Air Force (USAF) aircrew and may offer some distinct advantages in operational situations. However, any residual corneal haze or scar formation from PRK could exacerbate the disabling effects of a bright glare source on a complex visual task. The USAF recently completed a longitudinal clinical evaluation of the long-term effects of PRK on visual performance, including the experiment described herein.

Methods. After baseline data were collected, 20 nonflying active duty USAF personnel underwent PRK. Visual performance was then measured at 6, 12, and 24 months after PRK. Visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) data were collected by using the Freiburg Acuity and Contrast Test (FrACT), with the subject viewing half of the runs through a polycarbonate windscreen. Experimental runs were completed under 3 glare conditions: no glare source and with either a broadband or a green laser (532-nm) glare annulus (luminance ~6090 cd/m2) surrounding the Landolt C stimulus.

Results. Systematic effects of PRK on VA relative to baseline were not identified. However, VA was almost 2 full Snellen lines worse with the laser glare source in place versus the broadband glare source. A significant drop-off was observed in CS performance after PRK under conditions of no glare and broadband glare; this was the case both with and without the windscreen. As with VA, laser glare disrupted CS performance significantly and more than broadband glare did.

Conclusions. PRK does not appear to have affected VA, but the changes in CS might represent a true decline in visual performance. The greater disruptive effects from laser versus broadband glare may be a result of increased masking from coherent spatial noise (speckle) surrounding the laser stimulus.

Karta Technologies, Inc., San Antonio, Texas (RJD), Naval Health Research Center Directed Energy Bioeffects Laboratory and the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Brooks City-Base, Texas (JMAB), USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks City-Base, Texas (JBB, DJI), Air Force Research Laboratory, Brooks City-Base, Texas (FJL), and Conceptual Mindworks, Inc., San Antonio, Texas (WTT)

Received July 17, 2003; accepted April 5, 2004.

Richard J. Denniss

15314 Pebble Dew, San Antonio, TX 78232 e-mail: richard.dennis@brooks.af.mil

© 2004 American Academy of Optometry