Several years ago, I asked a Blue Cross and Blue Shield insurance executive why there was so much bad blood between oncologists and insurers, and he said something to the effect of “I’ll start trusting oncologists when they stop administering chemo to patients as they’re on the way to the morgue.”
That conversation came to mind when Jennifer Malin, MD, a medical oncologist and Staff Vice President for Clinical Strategy at Anthem, explained the company’s Cancer Care Quality Program to me. Anthem operates Blues plans in 14 states, making it one the nation’s largest insurers. And it recently announced a plan to acquire Cigna; if that goes through as planned, Anthem will cover 53 million lives by next year.
Instead of criticizing oncologists, though, Anthem is using payment reform, data-sharing, and a “we’re all in this together” attitude to encourage oncologists to improve the quality and lower the cost of the care they provide.
The basic payment reform Anthem is using is a financial incentive to encourage the use of cancer care pathways. The pathways for nearly 20 different types of cancer are posted online.
Here’s what I learned from our conversation:
Anthem’s payment reform initiative is called the Cancer Care Quality Program. How does this work?
Jen Malin: “When oncologists register their patients who are Anthem members with the program, they have the option of selecting a regimen that’s on a treatment pathway. When the treatment is on pathway, they are then eligible to submit a claim for additional reimbursement for treatment planning and care coordination of $350 per month.
“In addition to encouraging best practices through the use of pathways that are selected for being the most effective regimens with the best toxicity profile and the most cost-effective, the program will soon be providing data back to practices on their adherence to pathways and on some measures to help them evaluate how well they are doing in other areas of the practice and opportunities to improve care. Those include emergency room utilization and hospitalization for patients on treatment, as well as hospice use and admission to the intensive care unit at the end of life, which are two National Quality Forum-endorsed measures.”
Is this program available in all the states that Anthem operates in? Is it optional for oncologists—or mandatory if a physician wants to be in Anthem’s network?
“As of September 1, it is up and running in all 14 Anthem states, across all lines of business except Medicaid. That means it is available for fully-insured, self-insured, and Medicare Advantage members in all of our states.
“The program is optional from the standpoint that oncologists never have to select a pathway regimen, and in fact, we expect that there’s always going to be a good reason not to use a pathway treatment option in somewhere between 10 and 20 percent of cases. It is also optional to submit the claim without codes, and no one has to bill for it. So those two pieces are definitely optional.
“One of the ways that the program decreases the administrative burden is that Aim Specialty Health administers the program for Anthem. We have incorporated our prior-authorization requirements for drugs into the same operating system and process. So it is still a requirement to register the patient if the drug requires prior authorization; in those situations, it’s mandatory for practices in our network.”
How did Anthem decide on this program—as opposed to the oncology medical home and some of the other payment innovations that we are seeing around the country?
“There are a number of different efforts going on around the country, as you mentioned. The oncology medical home generally focuses on three areas:
· Improving patient access to the practice so they can have better symptom management;
· Improving palliative care.
“We are focusing on all three of those areas in terms of the quality aspects of the program, but the payment reform is currently tied to pathways. The reason is that we wanted this to be scalable across all of our in-network practices. I think most of the other models that have been implemented have generally required contract amendments, and not all practices have necessarily had the resources to be able to participate. We wanted to make our program something that any practice could participate in – the large groups as well as the one- and two-person practices.
“So this does not require a practice to have an electronic health record or any special technology. Regardless of where your practice is on the continuum of transforming and becoming an oncology medical home or a value-based practice, this provides you the opportunity to participate. It provides you additional resources for treatment planning and care coordination. And when you get your data from us, you will be able to start to focus on other aspects of changing your practice.”
How is the Cancer Care Quality Program working out so far? Can you tell whether it is improving patient care? Lowering your costs of care?
“Really important questions. We are just finishing the launch of the program in all 14 states so we have been in implementation mode this year in terms of adding regions and pathways. That being said, we are very enthusiastic because it does appear that most oncologists in our network are registering most of their patients.
“We have data on about 70 percent of the patients in our network who are starting chemo. It appears that, when a pathway is available, practices are selecting a pathway regimen, on average, between 60 and 65 percent of the time. We don’t have really good baseline data since we didn’t collect data before this program was in place.
“From our claims data, we are estimating that, prior to the program starting, practices were selecting regimens that would be considered on pathway about 40 to 50 percent of the time. So we think that there is a signal that there’s greater pathway adherence, which we think is a positive sign for improving the quality of care.
“In terms of the cost of care, we won’t have all the data for at least another year to year and a half. We do anticipate that in the next nine months or so, we should be able to start to look at other important outcomes, like hospitalizations during treatment. That is one important outcome that we think will be improved on pathways since those regimens are specifically selected to have better toxicity profiles.”
Will Anthem participate in the Oncology Care Model being launched by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI)?
“We did submit an application to be a payer partner with CMMI. We will not be adopting the model proposed by CMS, but we will proceed with our own model. We wrote letters of support for about 30 practices in our network that applied to participate. So once we hear which practices were selected, if CMS does want to work with Anthem and selects us as a partner, then there will be a memorandum of understanding that would be executed between Anthem and CMS, and we would work out ways to collaborate together, certainly on data sharing and using the same metrics and working together.
“We think this may provide a good opportunity for us to go beyond our model with that group of practices that is selected to participate with CMMI and give us the opportunity to test out some new innovations and pilot them with those groups.”
The American Society of Clinical Oncology has proposed its own payment reform model called Patient-Centered Oncology Payment. What do you think about that proposal?
“I’ve had the opportunity to review the proposal. I think it’s starting to move things in the direction that we all want to go, which is to really to think about paying more for the care that’s delivered to a patient, rather than specifically for a different chemo drug or different things that are done to patients.
“What’s really important to us as a payer is to have a system that is scalable and simple to implement within the current existing claims platform. That’s one of the big challenges with payment reform: We all want to change how services are paid for, but we are still stuck with the same type of codes and claims platforms we have had for years. Within the current existing claims platforms, it did not seem to us that the ASCO model would be that feasible for us to operationalize.”
Oncology practices are seeing many payment reform ideas. Do you expect that this will all shake out so that eventually there will be one payment model that all payers use to pay for cancer care? Or should practices expect to live with a great deal of variation in the way they get paid for the foreseeable future?
“I think payers all recognize that it’s important for practices to have enough consistency that they are not trying to do different things for different payers. That being said, in a free market system, none of us can openly communicate about how we pay for care. We can’t share prices, we can’t share contracts. So there’s a certain amount of variation that’s always going to exist in the current environment.
“But I do think there is definitely a recognition among all the payers that we need to have consistent approaches to measuring quality and value. And AHIP – America’s Health Insurance Plans – has been leading an effort that includes many private payers, as well as CMS. And it is including input from ASCO to try to help harmonize some of these issues.”
What do you want oncologists and practice managers to know about Anthem’s plans for payment reform?
“I want them to know that this is a dynamic process. We just launched the program. It took us a little over a year to get it fully launched. We are open to and hope to receive feedback from practices. Anyone can provide feedback on the program by going to our website. The web address is http://www.cancercarequalityprogram.com; and the email address is Cancer.Quality@Anthem.com.
“We really want this to be a dialogue and to learn from practices as they improve care. What are the best practices, and how can we spread those across our network so that all of our members can benefit?”
Listen to a podcast of the conversation in OT's 10/10/15 iPad issue.