Researchers are making headway in developing strategies to better categorize, prevent, and treat tumor lysis syndrome, a potentially fatal overload of potassium, phosphate, and uric acid that can occur in as many as one in five patients with certain blood or lymph tumors as a consequence of chemotherapy or spontaneous cell death.
Tumor lysis syndrome, or TLS, is triggered by the sudden and massive release of components of dead tumor cells entering the bloodstream, which cause severe disruption in blood metabolism leading to serious and sometimes fatal clinical events related to the buildup of potassium, phosphate, and/or uric acid—most notably acute renal failure.
In an interview, Mitchell Cairo, MD, Chief of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation and Director of the Children and Adolescent Cancer and Blood Diseases Center at Maria Fareri Children's Hospital at Westchester Medical Center New York Medical College, in Valhalla, NY, gave an overview about the current status of the condition.
He noted that TLS is the most common emergency faced by physicians treating patients with malignancies of the blood, bone marrow, or lymph nodes, including leukemias, lymphomas, and myelomas, and is seen most often in those with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and Burkitt's lymphoma.
TLS, however, can also occur with other hematologic malignancies and solid tumors and those with a high proliferation rate or a large tumor burden, or who are highly sensitive to cytotoxic treatment, he added.
In 2004, he was part of an international TLS expert consensus panel that proposed a set of guidelines for managing and treating the disorder, and categorized blood malignancies and solid tumors as being of low, intermediate, or high risk. A more refined version was published in 2010, and although the system is in wide use, it has yet to be formally adopted by professional cancer societies.
Laboratory or Clinical TLS
Their research built off of the Hande-Garrow classification system, published in 1993 by Vanderbilt University oncologists, which proposed classifying TLS into two types—laboratory or clinical (LTLS or CTLS)—based on patients who do not require therapeutic intervention and those with life-threatening clinical abnormalities (Am J Med 1993;94:133-139).
The earlier model required an increase in laboratory values of 25 percent above baseline, which did not take into account patients having preexisting abnormal values, Cairo noted. That model also required that changes occur within four days of the initiation of therapy, which did not account for patients who present with TLS or develop it before therapy or after four days.
Under the 2010 guidelines (see box), TLS is defined as the above plus any of several clinical manifestations occurring within five days of meeting these criteria, including new-onset renal insufficiency, cardiac arrhythmias, seizures, or death. Renal insufficiency is defined as a creatinine level of at least 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
Risk factors included biological evidence of LTLS, proliferation, the bulk and stage of the malignant tumor (and renal impairment and/or involvement at the time of TLS diagnosis). The guidelines also divided patients into low, intermediate, or high risk of TLS, and offered prophylaxis recommendations.
In general, most solid tumors are classified at low or very-low risk, but bulky solid tumors sensitive to chemotherapy, such as neuroblastomas, germ-cell tumors, and small-cell lung cancers, were classified as intermediate risk.
Cairo said that the consensus panel concluded that prevention is the best management strategy for at-risk patients, with hydration and prophylactic rasburicase for high-risk patients, hydration plus allopurinol or rasburicase for intermediate-risk patients, and close monitoring of patients at low risk. Similar recommendations were made for the primary management of patients with established TLS, with the addition of aggressive hydration and diuresis. The guides do not recommend alkalinization.
“The potential severity of complications due to TLS requires measures for prevention in high-risk patients and prompt treatment in the event that symptoms arise,” he said. “Recognition of risk factors, monitoring of at-risk patients, and appropriate interventions are key to preventing or managing TLS.”
In 2012 at the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, Cairo and colleagues presented findings from a retrospective study of TLS among 951 cancer patients treated in the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, the largest cohort to be studied to date (Abstract 238). The rate of TLS was 9.3 percent overall within one week of diagnosis, but among patients with certain hematologic malignancies—including leukemias, multiple myeloma, and esophageal and liver cancers—the rate was as high as 20 percent. In other major categories of malignancies, the prevalence ranged from about four to eight percent.
About two-thirds of patients with TLS had at least one clinical manifestation and, among subtypes of hematologic malignancies, the highest rates were seen in patients with leukemias (26% in LTLS patients and 16.4% in CTLS patients), followed by multiple myeloma, but the syndrome was not reported in any patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. For solid tumors, esophageal malignancies showed the highest rate (23.5%), but CTLS was much less common and occurred in only six percent of patients. In contrast, 14 percent of liver cancer patients had the syndrome, all of whom had clinical manifestations.
Nearly 85 percent of cases of laboratory tumor lysis syndrome occurred followed chemotherapy, but the remainder appeared to develop as a result of spontaneous tumor cell death.
Cairo said that elevated phosphorus was the most common component of the laboratory diagnoses, while high levels of creatinine was the most common clinical sign, and was observed in more than 50 percent of patients, followed by arrhythmias, which were seen in about 40 percent of patients.
“The incidence of LTLS and CTLS appears to be more prevalent among newly diagnosed cancer patients undergoing induction chemotherapy than previously recognized,” he said.
“Perhaps the most significant development in TLS over the past decade has been in creating risk-assessment parameters. Today TLS is much better defined than in the past. Overall, significant progress has been made in averting delays in therapy and preventing acute renal failure.”
Many clinicians, however, remain unaware of this progress, he noted. “In the last five years or so, more papers are using the grading system and more researchers are aware of it, but it is still difficult to get enough cases for randomized trials. Once the syndrome takes off, treatment is not as effective, so we do not want to let the horses out of the barn. Early recognition and prophylaxis are very important.”
Outcomes Data Sparse
Also asked for his opinion, Jeffrey S. Berns, MD, Associate Chief of the Renal, Electrolyte, and Hypertension Division at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, said that the most significant recent change in treatment of TLS is the widespread use of rasburicase.
“Today it's being used pretty early on, with an increasing trend toward using a lower fixed dose regimen—between 3 and 7.5 mg—primarily because it is less expensive, with similar reductions in uric acid levels,” he said. “But we still see hyperphosphatemia and TLS—these have not gone away completely.”
Recent systematic literature reviews have concluded that rasburicase improves uric acid levels, but it remains to be proven whether or not treatment alters outcomes, he added.
“One small paper recently indicated that treatment did not change renal outcomes, so the issue is still out there. We may never know. Randomized clinical trials are difficult due to the emergency nature of TLS, and these are really needed to prove whether or not treatment really helps.”
He noted that one meta-analysis, published in 2013 and based on a search of electronic databases, regulatory documents, and websites through August 2012, found that rasburicase effectively reduces uric acid levels in adults (Am J Kidney Dis 2013;62:481-492). This comes at a significant cost, however, and evidence is lacking in adult patients on whether rasburicase improves clinical outcomes compared with other alternatives.
Those researchers concluded that until new evidence is available, use of rasburicase may be limited to adult patients with a high risk of TLS.
The international consensus panel has defined tumor lysis syndrome based on the thresholds for serum uric acid, phosphate, potassium, and calcium, with at least two of the following required for diagnosis:
* Uric acid ≥ 8 mg/dL
* Potassium ≥ 6 mEq/L
* Phosphorus ≥ 2.10 mmol/L for children or ≥ 1.45 mmol/L for adults
* Calcium ≤ 1.75 mmol/L
Laboratory TLS is defined in the criteria as serum uric acid levels within normal limits, but serum phosphate and potassium levels exceeding the upper limit of normal. LTLS was also diagnosed when uric acid levels are above the upper limit of normal and either phosphate or potassium levels are above the upper limit of normal. An elevated uric acid, potassium and phosphate has previously been determined to be ≥476 μmol/l or ≥25% increase from baseline, ≥6.0 mmol/l or ≥25% increase from baseline and ≥2.1 mmol/l or ≥25% increase from baseline, respectively.
During the time period when patients are at risk of developing LTLS, electrolyte and chemistry monitoring should be conducted at least every six hours or sooner, according to the panel's recommendations.
In addition, calcium levels are not included as a criterion for establishing LTLS because hypocalcaemia may not be considered a direct consequence of TLS and is associated with high phosphate levels in most cases. This model should not however be used in patients with preexisting high uric acid levels due to gout prior to the diagnosis of their malignancy.
© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.