Skip Navigation LinksHome > November 10, 2013 - Volume 35 - Issue 21 > Where the Government Shutdown Left Oncology
Text sizing:
A
A
A
Oncology Times:
doi: 10.1097/01.COT.0000437962.88137.0d
Featured

Where the Government Shutdown Left Oncology

Lindsey, Heather

Free Access
Article Outline

Cancer centers were forced to cope in numerous ways with the consequences of the government shutdown—most noteworthy with the effect on research due to stalled National Cancer Institute grant applications and cancelled site visits.

In a few cases, centers struggled with the closure of other NCI programs—specifically, the Cancer Information Service, and a lack of communication about the logistics of NCI clinical trials that were under way at the time of the shutdown.

In addition, a huge concern was that the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center was not accepting new patients, including those with cancer.

“As long as the shutdown continues, the NCI will remain committed to advancing our common cause—research to control cancer—as best we can within the limits of the law,” NCI Director Harold Varmus, MD, said in an email sent on October 11 to NCI staff, grantees, advisors, and reviewers.

Figure
Image Tools

NCI staff members who were exempt from the government furlough were mostly in the organization's intramural programs and needed “to preserve ongoing research protocols, ensure laboratory safety, care for experimental animals, and, especially, serve our patients at the Clinical Research Center,” the NCI Director wrote.

However, he also noted in the email that with the shutdown: “The NCI's grant review cycle could be significantly delayed, threatening a smooth restart of NCI's support of extramural research, even if the NIH reopens relatively soon.”

Back to Top | Article Outline

Grant Processing on Hold

While grant applications were still being accepted at grants.gov, the NIH Office of Extramural Research discouraged submissions. “Applications will not be processed further until normal business operations are restored through Congressional appropriations,” according to the email from Varmus. In addition, the Department of Health and Human Services was operating the “Payment Management System” so that individuals with existing grants with no restrictions could continue to access funds, he had said.

The government shutdown happened “right at the turn of the calendar, so new grant submissions are problematic,” said Stan Gerson, MD, Director of the NCI-designated Case Comprehensive Cancer Center of Case Western University and University Hospitals Case Medical Center Seidman Cancer Center. “There's no feedback or engagement, so it has slowed down the review process.”

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center's ongoing operational and administrative interactions with federal agencies were put on hold, including the submission of federal grant applications, the flow of funds, and communication with federal program personnel, according to a statement from the center.

While NIH-funded clinical trials proceeded normally at St. Jude Children's Hospital, “long-term, the government shutdown could affect clinical trials currently in development and pending grants,” said a spokesperson for the center.

NIH-funded research also continued at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, said Jim Newman, Director of External Communications. Grants yet to be funded and new grants submissions, however, were stalled, since the offices that process those grants were closed, he said.

Nancy E. Davidson, MD, Director of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center CancerCenter and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, co-leads a committee that reviews new breast cancer trials for the NCI, but all activities were cancelled for October. “That means that new trial designs are being shelved until this crisis passes,” she said in a statement during the shutdown. “This may not affect a patient today but it will in the very near future.”

Back to Top | Article Outline

Cancelled Site Meetings

The NCI's Division of Extramural Activities (DEA) postponed several site visits to evaluate re-competing centers and large grant applications, as well as a dozen meetings to review grant applications, Varmus said.

Some centers—such as the Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center and Georgetown University Lombardi Cancer Center—experienced cancellations.

In a statement released during the shutdown, Louis M. Weiner, MD, Director of the Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, said, “The cancellation of the NCI site visit for our core grant renewal is an inconvenience and is disappointing, but doesn't change our day-to-day mission of conducting important cancer research and patient care. We will work with the NCI when the government reopens to determine our next steps.

“It's important to keep this in perspective,” he continued. “I think many will acknowledge that what is potentially disastrous is the ongoing research that has been either lost or destroyed.”

Back to Top | Article Outline

Trials at One Center Put in Limbo

While most of the cancer centers contacted for this article were not experiencing any interruptions to their current clinical trials, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center was an exception: “We're struggling with an issue unique to us,” Gerson said. “The center had been studying a drug obtained from the NCI in three or four small early-phase clinical trials that were actively recruiting. However, just prior to the shutdown, the NCI informed Case CCC that the trials should stop because the drug supply was running out.

“But they didn't offer us a solution or any mechanisms for dealing with the problem,” he continued. “We don't know who made [the drug] for them. And now, because of the shutdown, we're frozen out. We don't have access to the drug, and patients are stuck in the middle of a clinical trial.”

This is an example of the types of issues that impact the day-to-day activities of cancer centers, he said when interviewed during the shutdown. “We can't do without the NCI for a day, let alone several weeks.”

Back to Top | Article Outline

A Shuttered Information Service

Another consequence of the government shutdown was that Fred Hutchinson had to place 86 of its employees, who were fully funded by federal contracts to operate the NCI's Cancer Information Service, on temporary leave.

According to a statement from the center, these employees provided a free, bilingual service and responded to more than 10,000 phone calls, emails, and live-help chat sessions a month from cancer patients and their families, as well as from health professionals and the general public.

Back to Top | Article Outline

No New Admissions to NIH Clinical Center

Care for patients already enrolled in the 1,437 clinical studies under way at the NIH Clinical Center continued, but the center did not accept new patients during the shutdown unless they had a condition deemed to be imminently life threatening or unless they met the eligibility criteria for an existing protocol. Patients were also considered if the protocol offers some hope for an improved outcome, according to an NIH statement at the time.

Based on these criteria, the center enrolled 12 patients between October 1 and 8. Usually, about 200 new patients are enrolled weekly—approximately 15 percent of those are children, and about 33 percent of these children have cancer.

“We're concerned about the NIH not accepting new patients at the center,” J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD, MACP, Deputy Chief Medical Officer of the American Cancer Society said in an interview during the shutdown.

In addition to not accepting new patients, basic and translational research and the initiation of new protocols were also on hold at the NIH Clinical Center. Other suspended activities included training of graduate students and postdoctoral fellows, scientific meetings at NIH facilities, and travel of NIH scientists to meetings.

Back to Top | Article Outline

One Patient's Experience

An early indicator of the potential challenges patients faced was illustrated through the much-publicized experiences of Michelle Langbehn, 30, of Auburn, California, who has fibrosarcoma. She was trying to enroll in an NIH Clinical Center trial at the time of the shutdown and was told that if she qualified for the study she would not be able to receive treatment until the government reopened. “The NIH offers so many great potentially life-saving trials that can't enroll patients because of the shutdown,” she said in an interview for this article.

Her physicians had initially detected a tumor on her kidney in 2011 when she was 12 weeks pregnant with her daughter, now a year and a half old. At that time, surgeons removed half of her kidney and the tumor, which was misdiagnosed as benign.

In February 2012, she gave birth, and shortly thereafter began to experience neck pain, the result of metastasis to her spine and skull. She underwent spinal fusion and tumor resection in May 2012, followed by radiation and chemotherapy. After nine months of undergoing cycles of gemcitabine and docetaxel, her oncologist told her she could continue her current regimen, start oral chemotherapy, or consider a clinical trial.

“Since my immune system was recovering [more slowly] after each cycle of Gemtax [gemcitabine/paclitaxel], I felt it was time to look at the clinical trials available,” she said. She applied for a study evaluating cabozantinib at the NIH Clinical Center. “It showed promising results for other types of cancer, and there was some preliminary data that showed it might be promising for me, so I contacted the clinical trial coordinator and immediately started working on the paperwork.”

Her files were soon in order, but a week before the shutdown the trial coordinator informed her that while her records would still be evaluated, her potential enrollment would have to be put on hold if the government were to stop operating.

She was since informed that she was not eligible for the study and was extremely limited in what other trials she could investigate while the shutdown was in effect—“I've started looking at other avenues, but the vast majority of trials go through the government,” she said at the time.

Langbehn stressed that having the full support of her oncologist during this process was invaluable. “My oncologist has been supportive and fantastic, but patients are really left to be their own advocate,” she said, adding that she also had a tremendous amount of support from her friends and family.

Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share