Nuclear Medicine Communications

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 2008 - Volume 29 - Issue 12 > 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose standardized uptake value in ca...
Nuclear Medicine Communications:
December 2008 - Volume 29 - Issue 12 - pp 1040-1045
doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32831089b2
Original Articles

18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose standardized uptake value in cavitating non-small-cell lung carcinoma

Coffey, John P.; Hill, J. C.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: Cavitation in lung tumours has been considered as a specific clinical subentity related to worse prognosis and reduced survival. This study was performed to assess glycolysis as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET imaging, a known prognostic factor in lung cancer and an index of tumour aggression in cavitated tumours.

Materials and methods: Thirty-one patients with biopsy-proved, cavitated, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) underwent PET/computed tomography staging scans. SUVmax readings were compared with those of 37 patients with solid NSCLC tumours but with similar staging. Maximum tumour diameters were recorded together with survival at 2 years.

Results: Mean SUVmax, corrected for body weight, of the cavitated tumours was 14±6.8, compared with 13.5±10.8 for the solid tumours. No significant difference on paired t-tests was seen (P=0.83). The maximum diameter of the tumour was significantly greater (P<0.05) for the cavitated tumours (5.8±2.4 cm) than for solid tumours (4.4±2.4 cm). Six patients with cavitated tumours died at 2 years compared with 11 with solid tumours; no significant difference in survival (two-sided P value=0.48, Fisher's exact test) was observed between patients with cavitated tumours and those with solid tumours.

Conclusion: These findings do not support cavitation as a separate prognostic feature in NSCLC. Only tumour diameter was increased overall in the cavitated group. No increased glycolysis on PET/computed tomography imaging, relative to solid tumours, was seen and overall survival at 2 years seemed similar between the two groups.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.