Skip Navigation LinksHome > May 2013 - Volume 34 - Issue 5 > Added value of SPECT/spiral CT versus SPECT in diagnosing so...
Nuclear Medicine Communications:
doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32835fa552
Original Articles

Added value of SPECT/spiral CT versus SPECT in diagnosing solitary spinal lesions in patients with extraskeletal malignancies

Zhang, Yiqiua,b,c; Shi, Hongchenga,b,c; Cheng, Dengfenga,b,c; jiang, Leia,b,c; Xiu, Yana,b,c; Li, Beileia,b,c; Gu, Yushena,b,c; Chen, Shuguanga,b,c

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the added value of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/spiral computed tomography (CT) versus SPECT alone in the differential diagnosis of solitary spinal lesions in patients with extraskeletal malignancies.

Materials and methods: A total of 90 patients who had a solitary spine ‘hot spot’ that could not be definitively diagnosed using planar scintigraphy were enrolled in the study. SPECT/spiral CT was performed on the indeterminate lesions in the spine. Images were independently interpreted by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Each spinal lesion was graded on a four-point diagnostic scale (1, benign; 2, likely benign; 3, likely bone metastasis; 4, bone metastasis). The final diagnosis of each lesion was based on pathological confirmation or follow-up. κ scores were used to evaluate inter-reviewer agreement and agreement of the SPECT and SPECT/spiral CT diagnoses with the final diagnosis.

Results: Final diagnoses revealed 25 bone metastases and 65 benign lesions. Forty percent (36/90) of the solitary spinal lesions were diagnosed as equivocal (likely benign or likely bone metastasis) according to SPECT, whereas only 5.6% (5/90) were diagnosed as equivocal according to SPECT/spiral CT. For SPECT/spiral CT-based and SPECT-based diagnoses, the κ scores for inter-reviewer agreement were 0.889 (P<0.001, 95% confidence interval 0.824–0.954) and 0.504 (P<0.001, 95% confidence interval 0.401–0.607). The diagnostic accuracies of SPECT/spiral CT and SPECT images were 91.1% (82/90) and 58.9% (53/90), respectively (χ2=24.919, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Compared with SPECT imaging alone, SPECT/spiral CT imaging was more accurate and valuable in the differential diagnosis of solitary spinal lesions in patients with extraskeletal malignancies.

© 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Login

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.