Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Variable-time positron emission tomography leg protocol to equalize noise for positron emission tomography/computed tomography acquisitions

Wilson, Joshua M.a; Coleman, R. Edwarda,b; Turkington, Timothy G.a,b

doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328347f1a3
Technical Notes

Objectives: Positron emission tomography protocols conventionally use a constant scan time per bed position (BP). It may be optimal to spend more time scanning some body sections, particularly the more attenuating sections. The relatively consistent tapering of legs may allow a single, variable-time protocol that could reduce or redistribute time and equalize image quality throughout the leg. Reducing the total scan time will limit the opportunity for motion, which can reduce imaging artefacts and improves image fusion, will improve a patient's experience, and will yield the biggest gains in time for the tallest patients.

Methods: Leg dimensions were studied in 55 adult positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans. Image quality versus size was parameterized using bottle phantoms (diameters, 4.5–19.7 cm) filled with identical 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose concentrations, positioned as legs and imaged. An exponential relationship of diameter to noise was fit to the data, which defined the noise-equalizing, variable-time protocol.

Results: Of 55 patient leg studies, 94.5% (52/55) had leg diameters that were less than ±7.5% of the mean leg diameter for other patients of similar height. To equalize noise throughout the leg, relative scan times from superior to inferior as a function of BP are (1, 0.65, 0.45, 0.36, 0.30, and 0.25).

Conclusion: Variable time compared with a constant-time protocol can require 75% less time for some BPs and half the total acquisition time. A variable-time protocol to reduce time has been implemented.

aGraduate Program in Medical Physics, Duke University

bDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Correspondence to Joshua Mark Wilson, PhD, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3949-PET Facility, Durham, NC 27710, USA Tel: +1 919 684 7868; fax: +1 919 684 7130; e-mail: joshua.wilson@duke.edu

Received February 27, 2011

Accepted April 18, 2011

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.