Clinical Nuclear Medicine

Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2013 - Volume 38 - Issue 2 > The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT after Autologous Stem Cell Trans...
Clinical Nuclear Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318266cee2
Original Articles

The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Patients Affected by Multiple Myeloma (MM): Experience With 77 Patients

Nanni, Cristina*; Zamagni, Elena; Celli, Monica*; Caroli, Paola*; Ambrosini, Valentina*; Tacchetti, Paola; Brioli, Annamaria; Zannetti, Beatrice; Pezzi, Annalisa; Pantani, Lucia; Perrone, Giulia; Zompatori, Maurizio; Cavo, Michele; Colletti, Patrick M.§; Rubello, Domenico; Fanti, Stefano*

Collapse Box


Aim: The objective of this study was to analyze the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT after therapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Patients and Methods: One hundred seven patients prospectively recruited with MM had FDG PET/CT at staging 3 months after therapy (autologous stem cell transplantation) and every 6 to 12 months during the follow-up (mean 41 months). Patients were divided into group 1 (relapsed) and group 2 (nonrelapsed). In group 1, PET results and SUVmax were compared to the time to relapse (TTR). In group 2, the presence of PET finding changes during follow-up was analyzed to identify typical patterns of disease behavior (ie, late responders or stabilized disease). Patients with a negative PET at staging were excluded from further evaluation.

Results: Forty-seven out of 107 (44%) patients relapsed: 10 were excluded because of a negative PET at staging. In group 1, 22 patients had a negative posttherapy PET (59%, mean TTR = 27.6 months) and 15 had a positive posttherapy PET (41%, mean TTR = 18 months). There was a significant difference between the TTR of the two subgroups (t test P = 0.05). In patients with a positive posttherapy PET, the SUVmax was inversely correlated to the TTR (correlation coefficient = −0.7; P < 0.01).

Sixty out of 107 (56%) patients did not relapse. Twenty patients were excluded because of a negative PET at staging. In group 2, 27 patients had a negative posttherapy PET (68%) and 13 had a positive posttherapy PET (32%). None of nonrelapsed patients showed a progressive increase in SUVmax during the follow-up. There was no significant difference between relapsed and nonrelapsed patients in terms of SUVmax at posttherapy PET/CT (t test P = 0.7).

Conclusion: In our series of MM patients, a negative posttherapy PET was predictive for nonrelapse or a long disease-free survival. In contrast, a persistent significantly increased SUVmax after therapy was correlated to a short TTR.

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.