Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2013 - Volume 38 - Issue 1 > Comparative Effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET/CT Versus Whole-Bod...
Clinical Nuclear Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318266ce84
Original Articles

Comparative Effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET/CT Versus Whole-Body MRI for Detection of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Derlin, Thorsten MD*; Tornquist, Katharina MD*; Münster, Silvia MD; Apostolova, Ivayla MD; Hagel, Christian MD§; Friedrich, Reinhard E. MD; Wedegärtner, Ulrike MD*; Mautner, Victor F. MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and whole-body MRI for the detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1, and to evaluate a panel of imaging-based criteria serving that purpose.

Patients and Methods: Thirty-one patients were examined by whole-body MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT. A panel of imaging-based criteria including tumor region, size, shape, margin definition, contrast enhancement, heterogeneity before and after contrast, intratumoral lobulation, target sign, and mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) were evaluated. A SUVmax cut-off value of 3.5 was used for lesion analysis. Histopathologic evaluation and/or clinical follow-up served as the reference standard.

Results: 18F-FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity of 100%, whereas MRI had a sensitivity of 66.7%. On PET/CT, tumor size (P < 0.005), SUVmax (P < 0.0001), SUVmean (P < 0.0001), and tracer uptake heterogeneity (P = 0.002) were significantly associated with MPNSTs. On MRI, intratumoral lobulation (P < 0.02), ill-defined margins (P = 0.007), and irregular enhancement on T1-weighted imaging (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with MPNSTs.

Conclusions: Both PET/CT and whole-body MRI may distinguish benign and malignant PNSTs, but PET/CT has higher sensitivity for that purpose. Imaging-based criteria for identification of MPNSTs on both modalities were identified. False-positive results, requiring biopsy or clinical follow-up, may be reduced by using a combination of MRI and PET derived markers, but only at the price of reduced sensitivity.

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.