Strength and Conditioning for Soccer Players

Turner, Anthony N. MSc, CSCS*D1; Stewart, Perry F. MSc, CSCS1,2

Strength & Conditioning Journal: August 2014 - Volume 36 - Issue 4 - p 1–13
doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000054


1London Sport Institute, Middlesex University, London, England, United Kingdom; and

2Queens Park Rangers Football Club, London, England, United Kingdom

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors report no conflicts of interest and no source of funding.

Anthony N. Turner is a Strength & Conditioning Coach and the Programme Leader for the MSc in Strength and Conditioning at the London Sport Institute, Middlesex University.

Figure. No caption a...

Perry F. Stewart is the Head of Academy Sport Science and Medicine at Queens Park Rangers Football Club and a part time lecturer in Strength and Conditioning at the London Sport Institute, Middlesex University.

Figure. No caption a...
Article Outline
Back to Top | Article Outline


Soccer is the world's most popular sport with the Federation of the International Football Association (FIFA) estimating that more than 270 million people are actively involved in the sport worldwide. The US Soccer Federation (USA) has the second highest number of registered players of all countries and participation continues to grow. In recent years, there has been a remarkable expansion in and acceptance of sport science, and specifically strength and conditioning (S&C), within soccer. This discipline is recognized as a valid area of scientific and professional practice, with S&C practitioners becoming key members of the now multidisciplinary coaching team.

In addition to the necessary technical and tactical skills required, soccer players must develop and retain a high level of athleticism to be successful. Previous research has identified that aerobic endurance (4,15,17,44,62), ability to repeatedly execute high-intensity actions (58), speed (58,64), agility (32,58), and strength and power (89) are all determinants of superior performance. However, it is worth noting that physiological and physical characteristics vary between different positions. The aim of this article is to review the physiological demands of soccer to provide S&C coaches with critically appraised evidence-based interventions for elite male soccer players.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The level of metabolic conditioning of a soccer player is crucial in defining and ultimately limiting their contribution to the game (41). It has been shown repeatedly that maximal aerobic capacity is positively related to soccer performance parameters such as distance covered, time on the ball, and number of sprints during a match (15,17,44,62). Specifically, Helgerud et al. (41) reported that using specific aerobic interval training (4 periods of 4 minutes at 90–95% of maximum heart rate, HRmax, with a 3-minute jog in between) twice a week for 8 weeks with elite male soccer players (n = 19; 18.1 ± 0.8 years) achieved:

* Enhanced aerobic capacity, V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, from 58.1 ± 4.5 to 64.3 ± 3.9 mL/kg/min (P < 0.01).

* Increased the distance covered by 20% (P < 0.01).

* Average work intensity up from 82.7 ± 3.4% to 85.6 ± 3.1% (P < 0.05).

* Increased the number of sprints by 100% (P < 0.01).

* Lactate threshold up from 47.8 ± 5.3 to 55.4 ± 4.1 mL/kg/min (P < 0.01).

* Improved running economy by 6.7% (P < 0.05).

* Increased the number of involvements with the ball by 24% (P < 0.05).

Aerobic capacity also corresponds to a higher league position (89), the level of competition (5,72), and more starting players compared with nonstarting players (37,81). Accordingly, the aerobic capacity of soccer players must be developed, and Tables 1 and 2 identify position-specific values for aerobic capacity in elite male soccer players (5,78).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Soccer is characterized as an intermittent sport with repeated bouts of high-intensity activity. Therefore, for training to suit the physical demands of the game, emphasis should focus upon the ability to repeatedly execute high-intensity activities with short rest periods. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been reported to induce greater improvements in both aerobic and anaerobic capacity compared with continuous training involving the same mechanical work and duration (36). In addition to this, HIIT training modalities require approximately half the time of traditional continuous methods and are more likely to enhance player motivation and adherence and increase the time for technical and tactical practices. Fundamentally, they are not likely to be detrimental to strength and power (because of Type 2 muscle fiber recruitment), the significance of which will be described later. Helgerud et al. (41) and Hoff et al. (45) recommend a high-intensity endurance training modality aimed specifically at increasing V[Combining Dot Above]O2max; for this, the athletes complete 4 intervals of 4 minutes at 90–95% HRmax, separated by 3 minutes of recovery performed at 70% HRmax. Helgerud et al. (42) have compared 4 endurance training interventions designed to improve V[Combining Dot Above]O2max in professional soccer players (Table 3).

Back to Top | Article Outline


In high performance sports, it is generally accepted that the benefits of exercise are maximized when the training stimuli are similar to competitive demands. Small-sided games (SSG) are soccer-specific training protocols designed to develop technical, tactical, and physical capabilities (69). These games are typically completed in the form of several intervals, with varying numbers of players, different pitch dimensions, and modified rules. It has been reported that SSG expose players to significant aerobic and anaerobic loads, with a mean relative intensity of 82% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max and mean blood lactate levels of 4.5–4.9 mmol for a 4 versus 4 game (60); additionally, the number of high-intensity activities (43) and time in possession of the ball (60) are higher than that found in match play (11 versus 11 game). Reilly and White (70) reported no significant difference between HIIT and SSG in relation to heart rate or lactate concentrations:

* HIIT: six 4-minute runs at 85–90% HRmax, 3-minute rest between runs.

* SSG: 5 versus 5 games; six 4-minute games, 3-minute rest between games.

There are a number of factors the S&C coach must consider before designing and implementing SSG, for example, the condition capabilities of the players, the stage in the soccer season, the technical level of the players, the time of SSG application in relation to the match schedule and the team's strategic objectives (18). The number of players in SSG can influence the physiological and tactical element of the exercise. Rampinini et al. (69) suggest that as the number of players decreases the intensity increases, and results in players having more touches of the ball (9). However, although the frequency of technical actions is increased with fewer players, the tactical component of the drill is more limited as players are not restricted to specific positions and tasks.

Field dimensions can impact the kinematics of the players. The larger the playing area, the more time and space the player has to make a decision and carry out his actions. Conversely, smaller spaces reduce the time for decision making and actions and are likely to induce more accelerations, decelerations, and changes of direction. Also, physiological workloads and ratings of perceived exertion are higher when the playing areas are bigger (14,69).

In addition, the number of players and field dimensions, game rules can also impact the intensity of SSG. Mallo and Navarro (61) compared the demands of 3 exercises with different constraints and found that the inclusion of goalkeepers modified the physical and tactical behavior of the players; the exercises that included the goalkeepers reported that the players covered less distance, worked at a lower intensity, and tactically became more defensive.

It is evident that SSG provides an effective physiological stimulus to enhance and maintain aerobic and anaerobic capacity and allow for concomitant improvements of technical and tactical skills. However, S&C coaches should consider the pitch dimensions, number of players, rules of the game and timings as variables that can impact upon the intensity of the games. Table 4 provides examples of different formats for SSG.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Sprinting ability is an integral component of successful game play (58,64), with the ability to perform sprints repeatedly being a predictor of superior performance (58). Repeat sprint ability (RSA) has been described as the ability to produce the best possible sprint performance over a series of sprints (≤10 seconds), separated by short recovery periods (≤60 seconds) (12). Plisk and Gambetta (68) advocate using tactical metabolic training as an extension to repeated sprint training. This approach uses position and match-specific movement and intensities observed during actual competition. Advantages include greater time efficiency, with skill components being integrated into metabolic conditioning, and enhanced motivation and compliancy among players.

A common method of quantifying intermittent activity is often described by specific work:rest ratios. However, within soccer, there should be consideration for such ratios being heavily influenced by playing position and level of competition. It is suggested that repeated sprint training should aim to increase phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery. This is achieved by implementing rest periods long enough to replenish the majority of PCr but short enough to induce gradual fatigue to stimulate an appropriate training adaptation. A work:rest ratio of 1:6 has been suggested to develop the phosphagen system and resemble the demands of soccer in males (59); highly trained athletes may be able to train at a slightly lower work:rest ratio of 1:4 to provoke appropriate training adaptations (59). Anecdotally, the maximum effort duration should not exceed 6 seconds, and multidirectional as well as linear movements are beneficial.

In summary, it can be suggested that a combination of HIIT, SSG, and RSA training is used to develop aerobic and anaerobic capabilities within soccer players. It may also be prudent to recommend using predominantly aerobic and anaerobic intervals during the off-season, and a combination of SSG and RSA training within the competitive period due to the time efficacy and sport-specific nature of the drills.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Bangsbo (11) found that players sprint between 1.5 m and the length of the pitch during a match, but average 17 m. Around 96% of sprints are less than 30 m, with an average duration of less than 6 seconds and an occurrence of every 90 seconds on average (11). Other authors have reported that almost half of the total sprints are less than 10 m (63,79) and typically commence when the player is already in motion; therefore, maximal velocity is achievable in a reduced period of time and distance compared with sprints from a static start (58,74,92). This suggests the necessity to develop speed following a flying or rolling start.

Although there is growing consensus that the components that comprise speed performance are trainable, it is less clear what the optimal approach to training might be (34). What is known is that speed consists of a multitude of factors and that it requires dedicated training. To develop soccer-specific speed, it is necessary to incorporate perception-action coupling and account for the development of perceptual and decision-making aspects (76). Gamble (34) identifies the trainable determinants of speed performance as neuromuscular skill and coordination, postural control and stability, strength qualities, mechanical, and morphological qualities of locomotor muscles, and stretch-shortening cycle.

Back to Top | Article Outline


A soccer player changes direction every 2–4 seconds (82) and makes 1,200–1,400 changes of direction (10) during a game. Rapid activity occurs in the crucial seconds of the game and can make the difference in determining the outcome of the game. It is suggested that superior male and female athletes from a range of sports demonstrate better visual search strategies and produce more accurate and faster responses (2,26,31,73,86). The ability to produce fast-paced variable actions can impact soccer performance (32,58); so, a soccer player's agility must be developed.

For most athletes, a progression from closed to open agility drills is required. For example, Holmberg (49) suggests that agility is best developed by progressing through the following phases: technical drills, pattern running, and then reactive agility training. Technical drills involve focusing and developing specific movement patterns. Pattern running typically involves several preplanned change-of-direction movements sequenced in a sport-specific pattern and are generally considered very effective for novice athletes. However, once a high level of technical proficiency is attained, agility sessions that reinforce game-like situations while compelling athletes to respond to random stimuli are a more beneficial method of training. Therefore, SSGs are further advocated as they provide the opportunity to develop reactive agility. Moves that deteriorate under pressure can be rehearsed in a closed environment, with progress monitored in subsequent SSGs.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Soccer involves repeated powerful movements like kicking, sprinting, tackling, and jumping. Measures of power generation including sprinting ability (51,54,58,71,77) and jumping height and distance (16,71) have been shown to positively correlate with performance in soccer. Specific to soccer, jump height (r = 0.78), 10 m (r = 0.94) and 30 m (r = 0.71) sprint performances, and aerobic endurance are highly correlated with maximal strength in professional male soccer players (46,88). Table 1 (78) and Table 2 (5) identify position-specific values for countermovement jump (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ); CMJ is largely regarded as a valid test of lower-body power and SJ is largely regarded as a valid test of lower-body strength. The rationale for improving a player's strength and power can be noted when reading the research of Wisløff et al. (89). Here, the champions in the Norwegian elite soccer league, Rossenburg, were compared with Strindheim who finished in last place (Table 5). The authors suggested that the higher strength, power, and endurance capacity gave Rosenborg a better foundation for on-field performance.

Strength training, as developed by means of heavy resistance training, has been shown to improve initial acceleration and change-of-direction activities, H+ (hydrogen ion) regulation and buffering capacity, and repeated sprint ability; it subsequently delays the fatigue experienced in match play (22). Dependent on the player's training age, the most effective strategies for enhancing strength are summarized by Peterson et al. (67) in Table 6. The high and positive correlation that exists between maximum strength and peak power (r = 0.77–0.94) (6), further advocates heavy resistance training as a precursor for power development. Notably, strength training that involves high loads (>80% 1 repetition maximum [RM]) leads to greater increases in maximum muscle power compared with low resistance strength training (1).

Factors that influence power include both intramuscular and intermuscular coordination, maximal strength, and the various structural and neural elements that comprise the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) (34). Therefore, the multidimensional nature of power requires a multifaceted approach to training (65,75,94). These can broadly be categorized into 3 modes of training: ballistic resistance training, Olympic-style weightlifting, and plyometrics.

Back to Top | Article Outline


This training mode is characterized by an external resistance being unloaded (projected or released) at the termination of the concentric movement (19), for example, a throw or jump. This results in the load being accelerated for longer, allowing higher velocities to be achieved (65). Both concentric-only and eccentric-concentric variations of ballistic resistance training can be performed. However, exercises that exhibit a rapid eccentric-concentric coupling appear to be integral to the improvement of power. It has been hypothesized that each repetition should achieve ≥90% of peak power output or velocity (29); however, Cronin and Sleivert (20) reported that training at a range of loads, irrespective of which load constitutes peak power output, is in fact likely to produce superior results.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Weightlifting (snatch and clean and jerk) primarily features concentric force development. They enable relatively high loads to be controlled in an explosive manner in the vertical plane. Consequently, power output is maximized at much greater relative external loads than ballistic resistance training modes. In fact, Olympic-style weightlifting has been reported to produce some of the highest power outputs of any exercise modality (35).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Improvements made with regard to the utilization of the SSC through plyometric training result in an increase in jump and hopping height (4,24,25), reduced ground contact time (GCT) at all running speeds (4), increased rate of force development (13,87) and contributes to an athlete's ability to change direction (31,53,93). In addition, Voigt et al. (84) and Verkhoshansky (83) reported that economical sprinting (i.e., efficient usage of the stretch-shortening mechanism) can recover approximately 60% of the total mechanical energy, thereby increasing running economy. Although these findings were not limited to soccer, it is assumed that the results are directly transferable to many sporting movements specific to soccer.

Optimization of SSC mechanics through appropriate plyometric drills will improve a player's reactive strength. Flanagan and Comyns (27) suggest progressing through the following phases:

* Eccentric loading and correct landing mechanics (e.g., drop lands).

* Low-intensity fast plyometrics where a short GCT is encouraged (e.g., ankling).

* Hurdle and depth jumps upon which the focus is short GCT and optimum jump height (e.g., drop jumps).

It is evident that strength and power are determinants of successful soccer performance and also aid in preventing injury (discussed in a later section). The best method for improving these qualities is by combining heavy resistance training (using the protocols in Table 6) and power exercises in the form of ballistic resistance training, weightlifting, and plyometrics. For power training, it is suggested that training at a range of loads will optimize results, and these are anecdotally achieved while performing a maximum of 5 sets of 3 reps, with a minimum of 3-minute rest between sets (8,29). It may be wise to structure this type of training in blocks (traditional periodization, described in the next section), for example, strength endurance during the off-season with strength and power in the preseason.

Back to Top | Article Outline



The traditional periodization strategies (e.g., implementing a particular component focus for approximately 4 weeks and utilizing a 3:1 loading paradigm whereby progressive loading is applied for weeks 1–3 and week 4 is used to de-load) are generally concerned with athletes who need to peak for a single or acute phase (<2 weeks) of competitions (e.g., track athletes and martial artists) and are therefore not necessarily suited to team-sport athletes. Soccer players must reach their peak as part of preseason training, and then maintain it for extended periods of up to 35 weeks. Therefore, it has been suggested that while the classical or traditional form of periodization is appropriate during the off-season and preseason, a nontraditional (nonlinear) form of periodization is more appropriate to team sports during the in-season (33,48,55–57). This form of periodization involves the variation in training prescription and volume loads on a session-by-session basis to concurrently account for multiple training goals. It is suggested that one of the merits of this system is the ease with which sessions can be quickly tailored and administered in response to the intense and variable competition schedule (38). It should be noted that maintaining peak performance for up to 35 weeks is considered a thankless task (47,56) and is somewhat dependent on maintaining strength (3,7).

Kraemer et al. (56) reported that both starting and nonstarting soccer players had decreased performance over an 11-week competitive season. This indicates that the drop was independent of total match play and the volume load of practices and conditioning. A catabolic environment (high cortisol, low testosterone) was induced in the preseason and is likely to have determined the metabolic status of the players as they entered the competitive period. This highlights the need for a restoration period, particularly as they enter the competitive phase; such a period is referred to as a taper. It is suggested that regular physiological monitoring is performed to identify the training status of the players and team. This information will allow the S&C coach to taper training volume and intensity appropriately to provide an effective training environment. Tables 7 and 8 provide examples of an annual plan and competition microcycle (with 1 match played per week), respectively, for elite soccer players.

Back to Top | Article Outline


This block is typically 2–6 weeks in duration and involves relatively high volumes and lower intensities (specifically muscular endurance/hypertrophy). The primary objective of this non–sport-specific phase is to increase the player's tolerance to the continuously increasing training and competition demands and to address individual dysfunction. Exercises prescribed during this phase should focus on the individual needs of the player. See Table 9 for an example general preparatory phase mesocycle.

Back to Top | Article Outline


This block is typically 2–4 weeks in duration and involves high-intensity training with relatively lower volumes. The focus should be on sport-specific training modes to help facilitate greater transfer to training and matches (Table 10).

Back to Top | Article Outline


This block may be up to 35 weeks in duration; training intensity and volume may vary and is easily adapted to the competition schedule. The objective of this phase is to maintain the player close to their physical peak, with some suggesting that you may even be able to increase strength levels throughout the season (7). For example, Hoffman and Kang (47) reported significant in-season improvements in strength (1RM squat and bench press) in American football players (n = 53; 2 d/wk during in-season resistance training at >80% 1RM). However, American football and soccer impose different physiological demands with the latter more aerobic in nature and associated with high levels of fatigue and cortisol concentrations (56). As such, the goal is likely to be to minimize loss of strength in elite players. For an example competition mesocycle, see Table 11.

Back to Top | Article Outline


After the competitive season, there is a transition period before structured training commences. This period of active rest is used to dissipate any muscular, neural, and psychological fatigue (85). Nonstructured, low-intensity, low-volume recreational activities are recommended during this time.

Back to Top | Article Outline


It seems prudent to address injury incidence and potential preventative strategies within soccer. Soccer is classified as a contact sport with the majority of contact occurring between opposing players while contesting ball possession. In such a sport, injury of varying severity is inevitable. It is reported that elite male soccer players incur approximately 1 performance-limiting injury each year (21,39), with the average injury resulting in 24.2 days lost to training and competition (40). These inevitable injuries appear more likely to occur during competition rather than training (90). Arnason et al. (5) identified a trend between the high number of days lost to injury and the lack of team success in elite male soccer players.

The lower bodily extremities are most at risk from injury (90) with the knee, ankle, thigh, groin, and calf being the most injured regions (52,90), and sprains, strains and, contusions being the most common injury types (52). Furthermore, previous studies have shown that injuries caused by nonbody contact were more prevalent than injuries caused by body contact (39,40,91) and occur mainly during running and turning (39,40). Soccer players seem to be at particular risk for both hamstring (23) and adductor muscle injuries (5,66).

In a review of soccer injuries by Junge and Dvorak (52), several strategies for the prevention of soccer injuries were discussed. These included:

* Warm-up with more emphasis on stretching.

* Regular cool-down.

* Adequate rehabilitation with sufficient recovery time.

* Proprioceptive training.

* Protective equipment.

* Good playing conditions.

* Adherence to rules.

It is interesting to note that S&C training (or strength training in general) was not identified as a key factor. In addition to an increase in muscle strength, tendon, ligament, and cartilage strength would also increase along with bone mineral density (28,30,80), and therefore improve the structural integrity of all joints involved. Also, athletes who display an agonist-antagonist muscular imbalance may exhibit alterations in neural firing patterns, leading to increased braking times and inaccurate movement mechanics during rapid ballistic movements (50), which may expose soccer players to the aforementioned prevalent noncontact injuries during running and turning (39,40). In addition to addressing muscle imbalances, implementing exercises/drills aimed at improving the neuromuscular skill, coordination, and movement mechanics of speed and change-of-direction actions may also be of value.

In addition to the strategies outlined by Junge and Dvorak (52), prevention strategies such as increasing muscle strength (and its concomitant benefits to connective tissue adaptations), addressing muscular imbalances (particularly of the thigh), and improving movement mechanics (e.g., during running, turning, and landing) are recommended. Significantly, these would be addressed by virtue of implementing any efficacious S&C program.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Soccer is characterized as a high-intensity, intermittent contact team sport that requires a number of proficient physical and physiological capabilities to perform successfully. Aside from the necessary technical and tactical skills required, soccer players must also develop and retain a high level of aerobic and anaerobic conditioning, speed, agility, strength, and power. The authors recommend that these qualities are developed using the following methods:

* Aerobic and anaerobic capacity—HIIT, SSG, and RSA.

* Speed and agility—neuromuscular skill and coordination, strength, postural control and stability, and plyometrics.

* Strength—heavy resistance training.

* Power—ballistic resistance training exercises, plyometric drills, and Olympic-style weightlifting.

When implementing the training program, it is recommended that a traditional periodized approach is applied during the off-season and preseason periods and a nontraditional approach is implemented in-season (the competition period). In addition to the physical development training, it is important to incorporate components of injury prevention. This article provides S&C coaches with the necessary scientific research to implement an evidence-based training program to enhance soccer performance.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Trolle M, Bangsbo J, Klausen K. Effects of different strength training regimes on moment and power generation during dynamic knee extension. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 69: 382–386, 1994.
2. Abernethy B, Wann J, Parks S. Training perceptual motor skills for sport. In: Training for Sport: Applying Sport Science. Elliott B, ed. Chichester: John Wiley, 1998. pp. 1–68.
3. Allerheiligen B. In-season strength training for power athletes. Strength Cond J 25: 23–28, 2003.
4. Arampatzis A, Schade F, Walsh M, Bruggemann GP. Influence of leg stiffness and its effect on myodynamic jumping performance. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 11: 355–364, 2001.
5. Arnason A, Sigurdsson SB, Gudmundsson A, Holme I, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Physical fitness, injuries, and team performance in soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36: 278–285, 2004.
6. Asci A, Acikada C. Power production among different sports with similar maximum strength. J Strength Cond Res 21: 10–16, 2007.
7. Baker D. Applying the in-season periodization of strength and power training to football. Strength Cond J 20: 18–27, 1998.
8. Baker D, Newton R. Methods to increase the effectiveness of maximal power training for the upper body. Strength Cond J 21: 10–16, 2005, 24–32.
9. Balsom P. Precision Football. Kempele, Finland: Polar Electro Oy, 1999.
10. Bangsbo J. Time and motion characteristics of competition soccer. In: Science Football (Vol. 6), 1992. pp. 34–40.
11. Bangsbo J. The physiology of soccer—with special reference to intense intermittent exercise. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 619: 1–156, 1994.
12. Bishop D, Girard O, Mendez-Villanueva A. Repeated-sprint ability—Part II. Sports Med 41: 741–756, 2011.
13. Bojsen-Moller J, Magnnusson SP, Rasmussen LR, Kjaer M, Aagaard P. Muscle performance during maximal isometric and dynamic contractions is influenced by the stiffness of tendinous structures. J Appl Physiol (1985) 99: 986–994, 2005.
14. Casamichana D, Castellano J. Time motion, heart rate, perceptual and motor behaviour demands in small-sided games: Effects of field size. J Sports Sci 28: 1615–1623, 2010.
15. Castagna C, Impellizzeri FM, Chamari K, Carlomagno D, Rampinini E. Aerobic fitness and yo-yo continuous and intermittent tests performances in soccer players: A correlation study. J Strength Cond Res 20: 320–325, 2006.
16. Chamari K, Chaouachi A, Hambli M, Kaouech F, Wisløff U, Castagna C. The five-jump test for distance as a field test to assess lower limb explosive power in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 22: 944–950, 2008.
17. Chamari K, Hachana Y, Kaouech F, Jeddi R, Moussa-Chamari I, Wisløff U. Endurance training and testing with the ball in young elite soccer players. Br J Sports Med 39: 24–28, 2005.
18. Clemente F, Couceiro M, Martins F, Mendes R. The usefulness of small-sided games on soccer training. J Phys Educ Sport 12: 93–102, 2012.
19. Cronin JB, McNair PJ, Marshall RN. Force-velocity analysis of strength training techniques and load: Implications of training strategy and research. J Strength Cond Res 17: 148–155, 2003.
20. Cronin JB, Sleivert G. Challenges in understanding the influence of maximal power training on improving athletic performance. Sports Med 35: 215–234, 2005.
21. Dvorak J, Junge A. Football injuries and physical symptoms. A review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 28(5 suppl): S3–S9, 2000.
22. Edge J, Hill-Haas S, Goodman C, Bishop D. Effects of resistance training on H+ regulation, buffer capacity and repeated sprints. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38: 2004–2011, 2006.
23. Ekstrand J, Gillquist J. Soccer injuries and their mechanisms: A perspective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15: 267–270, 1983.
24. Farley CT, Blickhan R, Sato J, Taylor CR. Hopping frequency in humans: A test of how springs set stride frequency in bouncing gaits. J Appl Physiol (1985) 191: 2127–2132, 1991.
25. Farley CT, Morgenroth DE. Leg stiffness primarily depends on ankle stiffness during human hopping. J Biomech 32: 267–273, 1999.
26. Farrow D, Young W, Bruce L. The development of a test of reactive agility for netball: A new methodology. J Sci Med Sport 8: 40–48, 2002.
27. Flanagan EP, Comyns TM. The use of contact time and the reactive strength index to optimize fast stretch-shortening cycle training. Strength Cond J 30: 33–38, 2008.
28. Fleck S, Falkel J. Value of resistance training for the reduction of sports injuries. Sports Med 3: 61–68, 1986.
29. Fleck S, Kraemer W. Designing Resistance Training Programs. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2004. pp. 263–269.
30. Folland J, Williams A. The adaptations to strength training: Morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports Med 37: 145–168, 2007.
31. Gabbett TJ, Kelly JN, Sheppard JM. Speed, change of direction speed, and reactive agility of rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 22: 174–181, 2008.
32. Gambetta V. Speed development for soccer. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J 12: 45–46, 1990.
33. Gamble P. Periodisation of training for team sports. Strength Cond J 28: 56–66, 2006.
34. Gamble P. Training for Sports Speed and Agility: An Evidence-based Approach. Oxon, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2012. pp. 7–19.
35. Garhammer J. A review of power output studies of Olympic and powerlifting: Methodology, performance prediction, and evaluation tests. J Strength Cond Res 7: 76–89, 1993.
36. Gorostiaga E, Walter C, Foster C, Hickson R. Uniqueness of interval and continuous training at the same maintained exercise intensity. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 63: 101–107, 1991.
37. Gravina L, Gil SM, Ruiz F, Zubero J, Gil J, Irazusta J. Anthropometric and physiological differences between first team and reserve soccer players aged 10-14 years at the beginning and end of the season. J Strength Cond Res 22: 1308–1314, 2008.
38. Haff G. Roundtable discussion: Periodization of training—Part 1. Strength Cond J 26: 50–69, 2004.
39. Hawkins R, Fuller C. A prospective epidemiological study of injuries in four English professional football clubs. Br J Sports Med 33: 196–203, 1999.
40. Hawkins R, Hulse M, Wilkinson C. The association football medical research programme: An audit of injuries in professional football. Br J Sports Med 35: 43–47, 2001.
41. Helgerud J, Engen L, Wisloff U, Hoff J. Aerobic endurance training improves soccer performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: 1925–1931, 2001.
42. Helgerud J, Hoydal K, Wang E, Karlsen T, Berg P, Bjerkaas M, Simonsen T, Helgesen C, Hjoth N, Bach R, Hoff J. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39: 665–671, 2007.
43. Hill-Haas S, Dawson B, Impellizzeri FM, Coutts AJ. Physiology of small sided games training in football: A systematic review. Sports Med 41: 199–220, 2011.
44. Hoff J. Training and testing physical capacities for elite soccer players. J Sports Sci 23: 573–582, 2005.
45. Hoff J, Gran A, Helgerud J. Maximal strength training improves aerobic endurance performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 12: 288–295, 2002.
46. Hoff J, Wisloff U, Engen L, Kemi O, Helgerud J. Soccer specific aerobic endurance training. Br J Sports Med 36: 218–221, 2002.
47. Hoffman J, Kang J. Strength changes during an in-season resistance training program for football. J Strength Cond Res 17: 109–114, 2003.
48. Hoffman J, Kraemer W, Fry A, Deschenes M, Kemp M. The effects of self-selection for frequency of training in a winter conditioning program for football. J Appl Sport Sci Res 4: 76–82, 1990.
49. Holmberg P. Agility training for experienced athletes: A dynamical systems approach. Strength Cond J 31: 73–78, 2009.
50. Jaric S, Ropert R, Kukolj M, Ilic D. Role of agonist and antagonist muscle strength in rapid movement performance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 71: 464–468, 1995.
51. Jullien H, Bisch C, Largouet N, Manouvrier C, Carling CJ, Amiard V. Does a short period of lower limb strength training improve performance in field-based tests of running and agility in young professional soccer players? J Strength Cond Res 22: 404–411, 2008.
52. Junge A, Dvorak J. Soccer injuries: A review on incidence and prevention. Sports Med 34: 929–938, 2004.
53. Komi PV. Training of muscle strength and power: Interaction of neuromotoric, hypertrophic, and mechanical factors. Int J Sports Med 7(suppl 1): 10–15, 1986.
54. Kotzamanidis C, Chatzopoulos D, Michailidis C, Papaiakovou G, Patikas D. The effect of a combined high-intensity strength and speed training programme on the running and jumping ability of soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 19: 369–375, 2005.
55. Kraemer W, Häkkinen K, Triplett-Mcbride N, Fry A, Koziris L, Ratamess N, Bauer JE, Volek JS, MCConnell T, Newton RV, Gordon SE, Cummings D, Hauth J, Pullo F, Lynch JM, Mazzettii SA, Knuttgen HG. Physiological changes with periodized resistance training in women tennis players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35: 157–168, 2003.
56. Kraemer W, Nindl B, Ratamess N, Gotshalk L, Volek J, Fleck S, Newton R, Hakkienen K. Changes in muscle hypertrophy in women with periodized resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36: 697–708, 2004.
57. Kraemer W, Ratamess N, Fry A, Triplett-McBride T, Koziris L, Bauer J, Lynch JM, Fleck SJ. Influence of resistance training volume and periodization on physiological and performance adaptations in collegiate women tennis players. Am J Sports Med 28: 626–633, 2000.
58. Little T, Williams AG. Specificity of acceleration, maximum speed, and agility in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 19: 76–78, 2005.
59. Little T, Williams AG. Effects of sprint duration and exercise:rest ratio on repeated sprint performance and physiological responses in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 21: 646–648, 2007.
60. MacLaren D, Davids K, Isokawa M, Mellor S, Reilly T. Physiological strain in 4-a-side soccer. In: Science and Soccer (2nd ed). Reilly T, Williams AM, eds. New York, NY: Routledge, 1988. pp. 115–129.
61. Mallo J, Navarro E. Physical load imposed on soccer players during small-sided training games. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 48: 166–171, 2008.
62. McMillan K, Helgerud J, Macdonald R, Hoff J. Physiological adaptations to soccer specific endurance training in professional youth soccer players. Br J Sports Med 39: 273–277, 2005.
63. Mirkov D, Nedeljkovic A, Kukolj M, Ugarkovic D, Jaric S. Evaluation of the reliability of soccer-specific field tests. J Strength Cond Res 22: 1046–1050, 2008.
64. Murphy AJ, Lockie RG, Coutts AJ. Kinematic determinants of early acceleration in field sport athletes. J Sports Sci 2: 144–150, 2003.
65. Newton R, Kraemer W. Developing explosive muscular power: Implications for a mixed methods training strategy. Strength Cond J 16: 20–31, 1994.
66. Nicholas S, Tyler T. Adductor muscle sprains in sport. Sports Med 32: 339–344, 2002.
67. Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Applications of the dose-response for strength development: A review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designing training prescription. J Strength Cond Res 19: 950–958, 2005.
68. Plisk SS, Gambetta V. Tactical metabolic training: Part 1. Strength Cond J 19: 44–53, 1997.
69. Rampinini E, Impellizzerri FM, Castagna C, Abt G, Chamari K, Sassi A, Marcora SM. Factors influencing physiological responses to small-sided games. J Sports Sci 25: 650–666, 2007.
70. Reilly T, White C. Small sided games as an alternative to interval training for soccer players. In: Science and Football V: The Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress on Science and Football. 2005. pp. 559.
71. Ronnestad BR, Kvamme NH, Sunde A, Raastad T. Short-term effects of strength and plyometric training on sprint and jump performance in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 22: 773–780, 2008.
72. Rostgaard T, Iaia FM, Simonsen DS, Bangsbo J. A test to evaluate the physical impact on technical performance in soccer. J Strength Cond Res 22: 283–292, 2008.
73. Savelsbergh GJ, van der Kamp J, Oudejans RR, Scott MA. Perceptual learning is mastering perceptual degrees of freedom. In: Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research Theory and Practice. Williams AM, Hodges NJ, eds. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2004. pp. 230–247.
74. Sayers A, Eveland Sayers B, Binkley H. Preseason fitness testing in national collegiate athletic association soccer. Strength Cond J 30: 70–75, 2008.
75. Schmidtbleicher D. Training for power events. In: Strength and Power in Sport. Komi PV, ed. London, United Kingdom: Blackwell Scientific, 1992. pp. 381–395.
76. Serpell B, Young W, Ford M. Are the perceptual and decision-making aspects of agility trainable? A preliminary investigation. J Strength Cond Res 25: 1240–1248, 2011.
77. Siegler J, Gaskill S, Ruby B. Changes evaluated in soccer-specific power endurance either with or without a 10-week, in-season, intermittent, high-intensity training protocol. J Strength Cond Res 17: 379–387, 2003.
78. Sporis G, Jukic I, Ostojic SM, Milanovic D. Fitness profiling in soccer: Physical and physiologic characteristics of elite players. J Strength Cond Res 23: 1947–1953, 2009.
79. Stolen TK, Chamari C, Castagna C, Wisloff U. Physiology of soccer: An update. Sports Med 35: 501–536, 2005.
80. Stone M. Implications for connective tissue and bone alterations resulting from resistance exercise training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 20: S162–S168, 1988.
81. Thomas V, Reilly T. Fitness assessment of English league soccer players through the competitive season. Br J Sports Med 13: 103–109, 1979.
82. Verheijen R. Handbuch fur Fussballkondition. Leer, Germany: BPF Versand. 1997.
83. Verkhoshansky YV. Quickness and velocity in sports movements. IAAF Quart: New Stud Athlet 11: 29–37, 1996.
84. Voigt M, Bojsen-Moller F, Simonsen EB, Dyhre-Poulsen P. The influence of tendon Youngs modulus, dimensions and instantaneous moment arms on the efficiency of human movement. J Biomech 28: 281–291, 1995.
85. Wathen D. “Training variation: Periodization”. In Essentials of Strength and Conditioning. T. Baechle, R. Earle eds. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2000. pp. 513–527.
86. Williams AM, Davids K. Visual search strategy, selective search strategy, and expertise in soccer. Res Q Exerc Sport 69: 111–129, 1998.
87. Wilson GJ, Murphy AJ, Pryor JF. Musculotendinous stiffness: Its relationship to eccentric, isometric, and concentric performance. J Appl Physiol (1985) 76: 2714–2719, 1994.
88. Wisloff U, Castagna C, Helgerud J, Jones R, Hoff J. Strong correlation of maximal squat strength with sprint performance and vertical jump height in elite soccer players. Br J Sports Med 38: 285–288, 2004.
89. Wisløff U, Helgerud J, Hoff J. Strength and endurance of elite soccer players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30: 462–467, 1998.
90. Wong P, Hong Y. Soccer injuries in the lower extremities. Br J Sports Med 39: 473–482, 2005.
91. Yde J, Nielsen A. Sports injuries in adolescents' ball games: Soccer, handball and basketball. Br J Sports Med 24: 51–54, 1990.
92. Young WB, Benton D, Duthie G, Pryor J. Resistance training for short sprints and maximum speed sprints. Strength Cond J 23: 7–13, 2001.
93. Young WB, James R, Montgomery I. Is muscle power related to running speed with changes of direction? J Sports Med Phys Fitness 42: 282–288, 2002.
94. Zatsiorsky V, Kraemer W. Science and Practice of Strength Training (2nd ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2006. pp. 98–107.

soccer; program design; metabolic conditioning; speed; resistance training

© 2014 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association