Share this article on:

Strength and Conditioning Strategies for Females in the Military

Sauers, Sarah E. MS, CSCS; Scofield, Dennis E. MAEd, CSCS

Strength & Conditioning Journal: June 2014 - Volume 36 - Issue 3 - p 1–7
doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000060


U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors report no conflicts of interest and no source of funding.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Army or the Department of Defense.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (

Sarah E. Sauers is a Biological Science Specialist who is assigned to the Military Performance Division at the U.S. Research Institute of Environmental Science, Natick, Massachusetts.

Figure. No caption a...

Dennis E. Scofield is Biological Science NCO who is assigned to the Military Performance Division at the U.S. Research Institute of Environmental Science, Natick, Massachusetts.

Figure. No caption a...
Back to Top | Article Outline


Before 1978, women serving in the U.S. Army were segregated from men into the Women's Army Corps (WAC). That year marked the official disbanding of the WAC, and thus women began integrating with men during basic combat training (BCT) and noncombat military occupational specialties (MOSs). This historic decision to end segregated training required the U.S. Army to evaluate women's physiological responses to the physical demands of military training. As of 2013, the 1994 Direct Ground Combat Definition and Assignment Rule excluding women from serving in direct combat roles was rescinded, resulting in the availability of over 14,000 military jobs that were previously closed to women (6). Because women integrate into combat MOSs, the physiological demand placed on them during military skills training and occupational tasks will be greater than the physical requirements of noncombat MOSs. The ability to lift and carry loads, often for extended durations, is a recurrent physical demand in hostile and austere environments. The evolution of modern warfare has brought about an increase in external loads requiring soldiers to carry more weight (40). This occupational demand may be a contributing factor in the exponential increases in musculoskeletal injuries (35,36). Therefore, there is an emerging need for strength and conditioning professionals to prescribe and manage physical training (PT) programs that will meet the challenges within these military roles. This article will discuss peer-reviewed research regarding the importance of a periodized training program for female soldiers, the physical response to various exercise stimuli and military movements, and suggest training strategies to improve physical and military performance.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Currently, women comprise approximately 15% of the U.S. military, 13.6% of the active Army, and serve in 95% of all occupational specialties (5,22). Most of these MOSs can be physically arduous, especially combat MOSs, requiring individuals to perform occupational tasks that involve lifting, carrying, climbing, throwing, crawling, and load bearing (≥40 kg) at a moment's notice (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1,, which demonstrates combat MOS tasks) (18,23). The physical demands of these tasks use both anaerobic and aerobic energy systems. Considering the fitness levels of both men and women, research suggests that women may have baseline strength levels that are lower than that of most men, underscoring the necessity to develop training programs that address physical limitations and meet the current needs of the military (16,18).

The Army is currently conducting an evaluation of combat MOS tasks (e.g., load carriage over long distances, sprinting short distances to overtake a hostile position, carrying personnel to safety, and repetitive lifting of heavy objects), which will provide insight into the physiological demands of each occupation and help shape the design of the PT program. A previous examination of military occupational tasks of a light infantry unit revealed that the majority of tasks require moderate-to-high outputs of muscular strength, muscular endurance, and mobility (26). Currently, soldiers in these types of units will conduct tactical movements carrying an “approach” load averaging 46 kg for 6–8 km patrols twice a day in a combat environment. These tasks place a high physiological demand on the cardiovascular system. Additionally, other tasks require a high level of muscular strength. For example, dragging a 123-kg casualty to safety or moving pieces of a bailey bridge weighing 94 kg for 50 m (Figure 1).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Traditionally, military PT conducted at the unit level overemphasized aerobic exercise and muscle endurance and typically lacked strength, agility, and power training—components of fitness that correlate well with the physical demand requirements of many occupational tasks (e.g., repetitive box lifting, climbing, and carrying loads). The lack of adequate strength and power training as part of a PT program may result in injury and lost training days because soldiers attempt to perform high-intensity occupational tasks that they are physically unprepared to perform. Understandably, injuries not only lead to a loss of training days but also lead to increases in costs from clinical encounters and personnel shortages (9,30,41).

Injury reduction seems to be optimally managed using a concurrent aerobic and resistance training program that includes a dynamic warm-up and cool down. Without the correct exercise prescription, the risk of injury is increased as a result of physical unpreparedness when attempting to meet the physical demands of military occupations. Previous studies have reported that low levels of fitness and slower 2-mile run times are associated with greater risk of injury (12,14,17). For women, having the fitness capacity to sustain a high-intensity workload is important. In a study by Knapik et al., (17), it was reported that women had over twice the injury rate for all injuries, likely because of the high relative intensity of the physical activities encountered during BCT. Evidence suggests that improving physical work capacity through the integration of a properly periodized strength and power training program concurrent with aerobic and endurance training will positively influence injury reduction (20,25).

The implementation of injury reduction strategies are important considerations for an effective PT program. Exercise modalities that improve bone mineral density (BMD) and thus reduce the likelihood for stress fractures should be used (21). Stress fractures among female soldiers can be problematic for military service and occur at a higher rate in females compared with males entering the military (4). Evidence suggests that resistance training may be an effective stress fracture reduction measure when prescribed appropriately. Several studies have examined the effects of resistance training on BMD, and the results are encouraging. For example, 8 weeks of PT that includes a combination of aerobic and resistance training results in changes in bone biomarkers indicative of increased bone formation, an important consideration when developing PT programs for women (7,8,21).

During the performance of job tasks, military personnel are often required to safely execute quick, explosive, and repetitive movements, as well as be able to carry heavy loads, all of which can be vital physical attributes associated with combat survival. Adding an agility training component to the PT program will ensure that female soldiers strengthen the neuromuscular movement motor patterns that will both improve performance and also mitigate injury (2,3,25,27,31).

Soldiers often endure physically demanding work environments; therefore, superimposing intense PT sessions onto daily occupational demands has the potential to result in unplanned overreaching and overtraining. Although heavy resistance training, agility training, and high-intensity training positively influence injury reduction, body composition, and fitness when prescribed appropriately (18,24,28,38), female soldiers may respond differently to such training (18,39). This may require longer recovery periods between bouts of intense exercise, modified PT workouts, or both to prevent overtraining and injury. It is up to the strength and conditioning specialist to ensure that the PT program takes into account all facets of the soldier's demands of daily living to ensure that adequate recovery and progression occur and to ensure that injury and overtraining are minimized.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Progression and specificity are key factors to the success of any fitness program. A gradual introduction of exercise stress allows steady adaptation to higher levels of physical performance. Traversing rough terrain and obstacles, both in urban and mountainous environments, are current environmental barriers that a soldier must negotiate. Therefore, progressively introducing training modalities that improve balance, proprioception, and agility should be considered and can easily be integrated into the dynamic warm-up portion of the workout (20).

Performing repetitive lifts, carrying equipment and ammunition, wearing a “fighting” load (≥29 kg), and climbing over around and through obstacles require soldiers to maintain their muscular strength and endurance. Multijoint lifts, such as squats, pull-ups, deadlifts, rows, and so on, must be part of a routine developed to maximize physical preparedness. Workout days should alternate from high intensity (>85% repetition maximum [1RM]) to lower intensity (<67% 1RM) throughout a week to meet these demands. The repetitions and sets should correspond to the intensity level (Table 1). Distance running, sprinting, and hill repeats should also be included throughout training to maintain aerobic capacity. General strength exercises and multijoint lifts should be performed before specific single-joint exercises.

Several studies have shown that conditioning programs consisting of resistance and cardiovascular training in female soldiers improve physical performance, including adaptations in strength, power, and endurance, and also show that resistance training reduces gender differences in physical performance (10,15,18,19,31). Kraemer et al. (18) examined several periodized resistance training programs over a 6-month period. Subjects in the study were grouped into a total or upper-body only strength/power exercise program using 3- to 8-RM loads, a total or upper-body only strength/hypertrophy exercise program using 8- to 12-RM loads, an aerobic-only group, and a field exercise group. The field exercise group was limited to body weight, partner-assisted resistance, and ballistic exercise. The results of the study demonstrated that improvements were specific to the type of training program used. Significant improvements were observed in military occupational tasks such as repetitive box lifting in both the total body and upper-body resistance training groups. The study also demonstrated improvements in 1RM squat and bench press in the field training group during the first 3 months of training, supporting the inclusion of alternate training methods into a strength training program when traditional resistance training equipment may not be available. Most importantly, because it relates to the disparity of strength between men and women, this study demonstrated that 6 months of resistance training reduced the gender gap in physical performance measures. Moreover, all female soldiers in the resistance training groups successfully attained scores in the 2-minute push-up, 2-minute sit-up, and 2-mile run events that would pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), whereas the same was not true in the aerobic or field exercise groups. To support the importance of resistance training as an effective strategy to improve the ability to perform occupational tasks, Knapik (16) also reported that progressive resistance exercise with interval training improved the manual material handling capability of female soldiers. Additional studies support a combination of various types of training that include strength, power, ballistic, and plyometric exercises to elicit the greatest performance improvements in women (11,13,29,37).

When monitoring the strength and conditioning program, it can be expected that men and women may exhibit different responses to the program, especially in new trainees. Kell (15) examined the absolute and relative strength of men and women with previous resistance training experience after a 12-week traditionally periodized resistance training program. The program was a split routine with intensity of 55–87% for 3–4 sets per exercise. An approximate 28–38% increase in strength was seen in both female and male soldiers as a result of the periodized resistance training. Although the men were stronger in absolute terms, the women were more responsive to the training program.

The APFT is comprised a 2-mile run and 2 minutes of push-ups and sit-ups. Desired outcomes of an Army PT program should not only be based on measurable improvements in the performance of the APFT events. By military standards, physical improvements should include decreased run/loaded march times for a specific distance and increasing the number of push-up and sit-up repetitions in a given time. Improving performance safely and effectively with considerations of daily mission requirements and operational tempo are necessary metrics by which to monitor workouts, performance, rest, and recovery. Resistance training provides a stimulus by which women can significantly improve strength, and thus increase the likelihood of safely and successfully performing military occupational tasks that require a strength component.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The use of a periodized resistance training program allows for planned variation in the exercise stimuli through changes in volume and intensity (1,19,20,32–34). The 2 major models of periodization are linear and undulating (nonlinear). Linear periodization is a classic model that uses gradual increases in the training intensity while decreasing the training volume between cycles. Undulating periodization has more frequent adjustments in the intensity and volume, thus providing greater demands on the neuromuscular system and continuous changes on the stimuli (33).

An undulating periodization program can be modified based on the acute demands of the mission that may warrant rest/recovery. Increased awareness of lifting and movement technique coupled with neuromuscular adaptations may result in better task performance, reduced plateau in training, and a decrease in musculoskeletal injuries (33,40). Soldiers need to vary their daily intensity and volume to maximize strength increases and avoid stagnation. Particularly important is the ability to track unit training that may affect or be affected by PT. Many Army units have training cycles that can be physically and psychologically demanding. This information will be useful because the periodization scheme of the PT program is developed along with an understanding that acute amendments to the PT schedule may be warranted based on feedback and the daily physical status of soldiers (e.g., delayed onset muscle soreness, illness, fatigue, and so on).

Occupational demands (e.g., load carriage, box lifting) often require multijoint functioning, and several studies have examined long-term effects of multijoint exercises on the physical performance in women. Kraemer et al. (18,19) showed that a nonlinear program focused on strength and power using multijoint exercises was capable of producing continued increases in muscle hypertrophy in untrained women beyond 6 months. In another study, Reynolds et al. (31) conducted a 24-week periodized strength- and running-based training program in 45 recreationally active women, which resulted in a 33% improvement in maximum box weight that was lifted to a height of 52 inches. When posttraining results were compared with a sample of Army men, the women's average maximum box weight lifted was 81% (117 lb) of the box weight lifted by men (144 lb). Additionally, the study found that the women's loaded marching speed was 80% (4 mph) of the men's speed (5 mph) after completion of the training program. Although female soldiers were not able to lift as much weight as their male counterparts, the average weight lifted by women at the conclusion of this study falls within the MOS Physical Demands Rating of “heavy” by the U.S. Army. This study further supports that a periodized exercise training program results in significant performance improvements in women, thus narrowing the margin of fitness outcomes between men and women (Figure 2).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Competitive athletes generally tailor their PT to a specific sport and position and periodize their exercise training so that they are at their peak physical performance during a competitive season or event. Soldiers, however, must possess a strong foundation of fitness consisting of a myriad of physical capabilities that draw on all facets of physical and psychological fitness necessary to successfully maintain a state of physical and operational readiness. Considering that women are integrating into broader military occupational roles that are often physically arduous and conducted in hostile and austere environments, appropriate PT is the conduit to unit physical and operational readiness.

As the PT program is developed, the unique set of skills and physical capabilities (e.g., baseline fitness measures, military task requirements, and rate of physical progression) of all soldiers in a unit need to be assessed, along with an understanding that acute or daily adjustments may be needed based on operational tempo and soldier feedback. Additionally, disparities exist between men and women in baseline fitness measures of power, muscular strength, and endurance, which are important considerations when developing and implementing a PT program. A concurrent PT program consisting of both cardiovascular and resistance exercises that physically tax all muscle groups and develops all fitness parameters is a requisite to successfully perform military occupational tasks and mitigate injuries. Additionally, an undulating periodized fitness program will optimally prepare the female soldier for future endeavors that require a high level of physical preparedness while also reducing the potential for injury. It is the responsibility of the strength and conditioning professional to design PT programs that increase the physical work capacity of women by enabling them to attain their maximal physiological potential.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors would like to thank Dr Edward J. Zambraski, Dr Jan E. Redmond, Marilyn Sharp, and Kristen Heavens for their valuable input and guidance in the development of this article.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Baechle TR, Earle RW; National Strength & Conditioning Association (U.S.). Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008.
2. Bien DP. Rationale and implementation of anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention warm-up programs in female athletes. J Strength Cond Res 25: 271–285, 2011.
3. Bullock SH, Jones BH, Gilchrist J, Marshall SW. Prevention of physical training-related injuries recommendations for the military and other active populations based on expedited systematic reviews. Am J Prev Med 38: S156–S181, 2010.
4. Cline AD, Jansen GR, Melby CL. Stress fractures in female army recruits: Implications of bone density, calcium intake, and exercise. J Am Coll Nutr 17: 128–135, 1998.
5. Department of Defense. Statistics on Women in the Military. Available At: Accessed April 5, 2013.
6. Panetta LE, Dempsey ME. Elimination of the 1994 Direct Ground Combat Definition and Assignment Rule. 2013, Jan 24. Available At: Accessed May 6, 2013.
7. Evans RK, Antczak AJ, Lester M, Yanovich R, Israeli E, Moran DS. Effects of a 4-month recruit training program on markers of bone metabolism. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40: S660–S670, 2008.
8. Evans RK, Negus CH, Centi AJ, Spiering BA, Kraemer WJ, Nindl BC. Peripheral QCT sector analysis reveals early exercise-induced increases in tibial bone mineral density. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 12: 155–164, 2012.
9. Finestone A, Milgrom C, Evans R, Yanovich R, Constantini N, Moran DS. Overuse injuries in female infantry recruits during low-intensity basic training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40: S630–S635, 2008.
10. Gravelle BL, Blessing DL. Physiological adaptation in women concurrently training for strength and endurance. J Strength Cond Res 14: 5–13, 2000.
11. Grieco CR, Cortes N, Greska EK, Lucci S, Onate JA. Effects of a combined resistance-plyometric training program on muscular strength, running economy, and Vo2peak in division I female soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 26: 2570–2576, 2012.
12. Heir T, Eide G. Injury proneness in infantry conscripts undergoing a physical training programme: Smokeless tobacco use, higher age, and low levels of physical fitness are risk factors. Scand J Med Sci Sports 7: 304–311, 1997.
13. Hendrickson NR, Sharp MA, Alemany JA, Walker LA, Harman EA, Spiering BA, Hatfield DL, Yamamoto LM, Maresh CM, Kraemer WJ, Nindl BC. Combined resistance and endurance training improves physical capacity and performance on tactical occupational tasks. Eur J Appl Physiol 109: 1197–1208, 2010.
14. Jones BH, Cowan DN, Tomlinson JP, Robinson JR, Polly DW, Frykman PN. Epidemiology of injuries associated with physical training among young men in the army. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25: 197–203, 1993.
15. Kell RT. The influence of periodized resistance training on strength changes in men and women. J Strength Cond Res 25: 735–744, 2011.
16. Knapik JJ. The influence of physical fitness training on the manual material handling capability of women. Appl Ergon 28: 339–345, 1997.
17. Knapik JJ, Sharp MA, Canham-Chervak M, Hauret K, Patton JF, Jones BH. Risk factors for training-related injuries among men and women in basic combat training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: 946–954, 2001.
18. Kraemer WJ, Mazzetti SA, Nindl BC, Gotshalk LA, Volek JS, Bush JA, Marx JO, Dohi K, Gomez AL, Miles M, Fleck SJ, Newton RU, Hakkinen K. Effect of resistance training on women's strength/power and occupational performances. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: 1011–1025, 2001.
19. Kraemer WJ, Nindl BC, Ratamess NA, Gotshalk LA, Volek JS, Fleck SJ, Newton RU, Hakkinen K. Changes in muscle hypertrophy in women with periodized resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36: 697–708, 2004.
20. Kraemer WJ, Szivak TK. Strength training for the warfighter. J Strength Cond Res 26(Suppl 2): S107–S118, 2012.
21. Lester ME, Urso ML, Evans RK, Pierce JR, Spiering BA, Maresh CM, Hatfield DL, Kraemer WJ, Nindl BC. Influence of exercise mode and osteogenic index on bone biomarker responses during short-term physical training. Bone 45: 768–776, 2009.
22. Maxfield BD. Army Demographics FY12 Army Profile. Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 2012.
23. Myers DC, Gephardt DL, Crump CE. Validation of the military entrance physical strength capacity test. In: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences Technical Report 610. Dot Army, ed, Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 1984.
24. Nindl BC, Harman EA, Marx JO, Gotshalk LA, Frykman PN, Lammi E, Palmer C, Kraemer WJ. Regional body composition changes in women after 6 months of periodized physical training. J Appl Physiol 88: 2251–2259, 2000.
25. Noyes FR, Barber Westin SD. Anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention training in female athletes: A systematic review of injury reduction and results of athletic performance tests. Sports Health 4: 36–46, 2012.
26. O'Donnell FM. Physical Training Programs in Light Infantry Units: Are They Preparing Soldiers for the Rigors of Combat? US Army Command and General Staff College, Ft. Leavenworth, KS, 2001. pp. 1–115.
27. O'Driscoll J, Kerin F, Delahunt E. Effect of a 6-week dynamic neuromuscular training programme on ankle joint function: A case report. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 3: 13, 2011.
28. O'Hara RB, Serres J, Traver KL, Wright B, Vojta C, Eveland E. The influence of nontraditional training modalities on physical performance: Review of the literature. Aviat Space Environ Med 83: 985–990, 2012.
29. Pienaar C, Coetzee B. Changes in selected physical, motor performance and anthropometric components of university-level rugby players after one microcycle of a combined rugby conditioning and plyometric training program. J Strength Cond Res 27: 398–415, 2013.
30. Protzman RR, Griffis CG. Stress fractures in men and women undergoing military training. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59: 825, 1977.
31. Reynolds KL, Harman EA, Worsham RE, Sykes MB, Frykman PN, Backus VL. Injuries in women associated with a periodized strength training and running program. J Strength Cond Res 15: 136–143, 2001.
32. Rhea MR, Alderman BL. A meta-analysis of periodized versus nonperiodized strength and power training programs. Res Q Exerc Sport 75: 413–422, 2004.
33. Rhea MR, Ball SD, Phillips WT, Burkett LN. A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for strength. J Strength Cond Res 16: 250–255, 2002.
34. Rhea MR, Phillips WT, Burkett LN, Stone WJ, Ball SD, Alvar BA, Thomas AB. A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for local muscular endurance. J Strength Cond Res 17: 82–87, 2003.
35. Roy TC, Knapik JJ, Ritland BM, Murphy N, Sharp MA. Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries for soldiers deployed to Afghanistan. Aviat Space Environ Med 83: 1060–1066, 2012.
36. Roy TC, Ritland BM, Knapik JJ, Sharp MA. Lifting tasks are associated with injuries during the early portion of a deployment to Afghanistan. Mil Med 177: 716–722, 2012.
37. Saez de Villarreal E, Requena B, Izquierdo M, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ. Enhancing sprint and strength performance: Combined versus maximal power, traditional heavy-resistance and plyometric training. J Sci Med Sport 16: 146–150, 2013.
38. Smith MM, Sommer AJ, Starkoff BE, Devor ST. Crossfit-based high intensity power training improves maximal aerobic fitness and body composition. J Strength Cond Res 11: 3159–3172, 2013.
39. Strohbach CA, Scofield DE, Nindl BC, Centi AJ, Yanovich R, Evans RK, Moran DS. Female recruits sustaining stress fractures during military basic training demonstrate differential concentrations of circulating IGF-I system components: a preliminary study. Growth Horm IGF Res 22: 151–157, 2012.
40. Szivak TK, Kraemer WJ, Nindl BC, Gotshalk LA, Volek JS, Gomez AL, Dunn-Lewis C, Looney DP, Comstock BA, Hooper DR, Flanagan SD, Maresh CM. Relationships of physical performance tests to military-relevant tasks in women. US Army Med Dep J 1–7, 2013.
41. Yanovich R, Merkel D, Israeli E, Evans RK, Erlich T, Moran DS. Anemia, iron deficiency, and stress fractures in female combatants during 16 months. J Strength Cond Res 25: 3412–3421, 2011.

military; female; physical training program; resistance training; periodization

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
© 2014 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association