ABSTRACT: LONG DURATION AEROBIC EXERCISE HAS LONG BEEN A STAPLE OF TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR BOTH AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC ATHLETES. WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS MODE OF TRAINING HAS THE POTENTIAL TO INDUCE NUMEROUS PHYSIOLOGICAL BENEFITS WHICH ENHANCE METABOLIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR PERFORMANCE. HOWEVER, MUCH DEBATE EXISTS OVER WHETHER OR NOT ANAEROBIC ATHLETES ARE ABLE TO ACHIEVE THESE SAME ADAPTATIONS THROUGH OTHER FORMS OF EXERCISE. THIS QUESTIONS THE NECESSITY OF LONG DURATION AEROBIC EXERCISE FOR THESE ATHLETES. THE FOLLOWING COLUMN WILL ARGUE FOR (PRO) AND AGAINST (CON) THE NEED FOR ANAEROBIC ATHLETES TO ENGAGE IN LONG DURATION AEROBIC EXERCISE.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU. VISIT NSCA-SCJ.COM TO WEIGH IN ON THE POINT/COUNTERPOINT QUICK POLL.
1Human Performance Laboratory, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana; and
2Center for Sport Performance, California State University, Fullerton, California
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors report no conflicts of interest and no source of funding.
The purpose of the Point/Counterpoint Column is to provide a respectful and balanced discussion in relation to controversial or current topics in the fields of strength and conditioning, nutrition, and human performance.
COLUMN EDITOR: Andrew J. Galpin, PhD, CSCS, NCSA-CPT
Kevin A. Murach is a doctoral research fellow in Human Bioenergetics at the Ball State University Human Performance Laboratory.
James R. Bagley is a doctoral candidate in Human Bioenergetics at the Ball State University Human Performance Laboratory.
Charles J. Pfeiffer is an assistant Track & Field coach in Orange County, CA and a graduate student at the Center for Sport Performance at California State University, Fullerton.