You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Static Posture Assessment Screen of Athletes: Benefits and Considerations

Kritz, Matthew F MSc, CSCS1; Cronin, John PhD1,2

Strength & Conditioning Journal:
doi: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e318187e241
Articles
Abstract

THERE IS AN EMERGING TREND WITHIN THE STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING PROFESSION TO IDENTIFY AND CORRECT THE FAULTY MOVEMENT PATTERNS OF ATHLETES BEFORE ANY SUBSTANTIAL STRENGTHENING OF MUSCLE IS UNDERTAKEN. STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING PROFESSIONALS IN SOME CASES FAIL TO RECOGNIZE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATIC POSTURE AND DYNAMIC MOVEMENT ABILITY. THIS REVIEW WILL INFORM THE READER OF THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF SCREENING STATIC POSTURE BEFORE ASSESSING AN ATHLETE'S MOVEMENT ABILITY. THE CHARACTERISTICS OF OPTIMAL STANDING POSTURE ARE REVIEWED WITH SUPPORTING BIOMECHANICAL RATIONALE. SPORT-SPECIFIC POPULATIONS ARE REVIEWED, AND THE BENEFITS AND CONSEQUENCES OF “SPORT-SPECIFIC POSTURES” ARE DISCUSSED.

Author Information

1Institute of Sport & Recreation Research New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand; 2Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia

Matt Kritz is currently pursuing a PhD in sports science at the Institute of Sport & Recreation Research New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology and is a strength and conditioning coach for the New Zealand Academy of Sport.

John Cronin is an Associate Professor at Auckland University of Technology.

© 2008 National Strength and Conditioning Association