Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2009 - Volume 23 - Issue 2 > Lean Body Mass and Weight-Bearing Activity in the Prediction...
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31819420e1
Original Research

Lean Body Mass and Weight-Bearing Activity in the Prediction of Bone Mineral Density in Physically Active Men

Rector, R Scott; Rogers, Robert; Ruebel, Meghan; Widzer, Matthew O; Hinton, Pamela S

Collapse Box

Abstract

Rector, RS, Rogers, R, Ruebel, M, Widzer, MO, and Hinton, PS. Lean body mass and weight-bearing activity in the prediction of bone mineral density in physically active men. J Strength Cond Res 23(2): 427-435, 2009-Weight-bearing endurance activity and resistance exercise are recommended to help preserve bone health during adulthood. However, the effects of resistance training relative to those of weight-bearing endurance activity often are confounded by body weight and composition. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of long-term running, cycling, and resistance training on whole-body and regional bone mineral density (BMD), adjusting for body weight and composition. Cyclists (CYCLE; n = 19), runners (RUN; n = 10), and resistance trained men (RT; n = 13) ages 19-45 years participated in this cross-sectional study. Current and lifetime bone loading was calculated using ground-reaction force values of the reported physical activities. Whole-body and regional BMD and body composition were assessed using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Bone turnover markers and hormones were measured in fasting serum samples. The RT athletes had significantly greater body weight, lean body mass (LBM), and fat mass than CYCLE and RUN athletes; percent body fat did not differ among groups. Unadjusted BMD at all sites was significantly greater in the RT compared with CYCLE and RUN. After adjusting for LBM, RUN had significantly greater spine BMD than CYCLE. Subjects' LBM was a significant predictor of BMD in RT and CYCLE but not in RUN, suggesting that high-impact activity may override the benefits of LBM on BMD. Current bone loading was positively associated with serum osteocalcin concentrations (r = 0.480, p = 0.002). In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrate that long-term running and resistance training increase BMD compared with cycling. However, it seems that high-impact activities, such as running, have a greater positive effect on BMD than resistance training.

© 2009 National Strength and Conditioning Association

 

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.