Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > November 2006 - Volume 20 - Issue 4 > The Impact of Different Pacing Strategies on Five-Kilometer...
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
ORIGINAL RESEARCH: PDF Only

The Impact of Different Pacing Strategies on Five-Kilometer Running Time Trial Performance

GOSZTYLA, AMY E.; EDWARDS, DAVID G.; QUINN, TIMOTHY J.; KENEFICK, ROBERT W.

Collapse Box

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal 1.63-km (1-mile) pacing strategy for 5-km running performance in moderately trained women distance runners. Eleven women distance runners (20.7 +/- 0.8 years, 163.8 +/- 2.0 cm, 57.0 +/- 2.2 kg, 51.7 +/- 1.0 ml[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1, 18.9 +/- 0.8% fat, 78.1 +/- 1.4% [latin capital V with dot above]O2max at lactate threshold) performed 2 preliminary 5-km time trials on a treadmill to establish baseline 5-km times. The average 1.63-km split pace of the fastest preliminary trial was manipulated for the first 1.63 km of the experimental trials and run either equal to (EVEN), 3% faster than (3%), or 6% faster than (6%) the current baseline average 1.63-km pace for each subject. Ventilation (VE), oxygen consumption ([latin capital V with dot above]O2), respiratory exchange ratio, and heart rate were measured continuously. Overall 5-km times were not different (p < 0.05) for the EVEN, 3% and 6% trials finishing in 21:11 (minutes/seconds) +/- 29 seconds, 20:52 +/- 36 seconds and 20:39 +/- 29 seconds, respectively. The fastest time for 8 subjects resulted from the 6% trial and the other 3 subjects' fastest times resulted from the 3% trial. The overall exercise intensity (%[latin capital V with dot above]O2max, %[latin capital V with dot above]O2max above lactate threshold, VE, and respiratory exchange ratio) of the first 1.63-km split was not different between the 3 and 6% trials, despite the 6% trial being 13 seconds faster than the 3% trial. Based on these findings, initial 1.63-km starting paces of a 5-km race can be 3 to 6% greater than current average race pace without negatively impacting performance. In order to optimize 5-km performance, runners should start the initial 1.63 km of a 5-km race at paces 3-6% greater than their current average race pace.

(C) 2006 National Strength and Conditioning Association

Login




Help

Forgot Password?

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.