You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Validity of 1RM Prediction Equations for Older Adults.

KNUTZEN, KATHLEEN M.; BRILLA, LORRAINE R.; CAINE, DENNIS
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
Original Article: PDF Only
Abstract

This study examined the validity of 6 1-repetition maximum (1RM) repetitions-to-fatigue prediction equations on 11 machine lifts for 51 older adults (70.7 +/- 6.1 years). In the first session, subjects selected a weight that they could lift for 7-10 repetitions on each machine exercise, and a 1RM was predicted using 6 different equations. In session 2, subjects completed an actual 1RM by selecting the maximum load that they could safely lift once (1-3 reps). Correlations between the actual and the 6 predicted 1RM scores demonstrated a moderate to strong relationship for all exercises (upper extremity: r = 0.77-0.90; lower extremity: r = 0.60-0.80). The average predicted 1RM value was lower than the actual 1RM for all exercises and all prediction equations (p <= 0.001). The use of a prediction equation for older adults appears to be a valid measure of 1RM within a range of 1-10 kg, depending on the machine lift. In all cases, the prediction equation underestimated the actual 1RM.

(C) 1999 National Strength and Conditioning Association