You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Physiological Determinants of the Cycling Time Trial

Støren, Øyvind1; Ulevåg, Kåre1,2; Larsen, Morten H.1; Støa, Eva M.1; Helgerud, Jan1,3,4

Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827f5427
Original Research

Abstract: Støren, Ø, Ulevåg, K, Larsen, MH, Støa, EM, and Helgerud, J. Physiological determinants of the cycling time trial. J Strength Cond Res 27(9): 2366–2373, 2013—The purpose of this study was to examine the physiological determinants of endurance cycling time trial (TT) performance in a heterogeneous group of competitive male road cyclists. About 15 male cyclists who had all competed in cycling the preceding season were tested for the anthropometric variables height, body weight, leg length, ankle circumference, and body fat percentage. They were also tested for maximal oxygen consumption (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max), lactate threshold (LT), metabolic cost of cycling (CC), peak power output and average power output during a 30-second Wingate test, 1 repetition maximum and peak power in half squats, and a TT test on an ergometer. Heart rate and cadence (rounds per minute, RPM) were continuously measured during all cycle tests. Pearson Bivariate correlation tests and single linear regression tests were performed to obtain correlation coefficients (r), effect size (F), standard error of estimate (SEE), and 95% confidence interval. The single variable that correlated best with TT performance was power output at LT (r = 0.86, p < 0.01). Standard error of estimate was 7.5%. Lactate threshold expressed in %V[Combining Dot Above]O2max did not correlate significantly with TT performance. An equation representing both aerobic and anaerobic endurance capacity TT(w) = 0.95 ([V[Combining Dot Above]O2max/CC] TT%V[Combining Dot Above]O2max) + 0.05 (Wingate average) correlated strongly with TT laboratory performance (r = 0.93, p < 0.01, SEE = 5.7%). None of the strength, power, or anthropometric variables correlated significantly with TT laboratory performance.

Author Information

1Department of Sport and Outdoor Life Studies, Telemark University College, Bø, Telemark, Norway

2Tvedestrand Sport Medical Centre, Tvedestrand, Norway

3Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

4Hokksund Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Hokksund, Norway

Address correspondence to Øyvind Støren,

Copyright © 2013 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association.