You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Kinematic Factors Affecting Fast and Slow Straight and Change-of-Direction Acceleration Times

Hewit, Jennifer K.1; Cronin, John B.1,2; Hume, Patria A.1

Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824f202d
Original Research

Abstract: Hewit, JK, Cronin, JB, and Hume, PA. Kinematic factors affecting fast and slow straight and change-of-direction acceleration times. J Strength Cond Res 27(1): 69–75, 2013—In many sports, players are often required to accelerate immediately after rapid changes of direction (CODs) before performing a subsequent COD movement. Therefore, court-based players will often not attain their maximum velocity before having to decelerate and change direction. The purpose of this study was to determine what kinematic factors affected fast and slow straight acceleration (SA) and change-of-direction acceleration (CODA) times. National under-21 netball players performed 3 trials each of a 2.5-m SA and a CODA involving a 180° COD followed immediately by a 2.5-m sprint. Players were grouped into either a faster or slower category based on performance times (2.5-m time). Significantly higher average step frequency (4%, p = 0.03) was observed for the faster group when compared with the slower group in the CODA task. For the SA task, faster times were associated with significantly smaller average step lengths (SLs; 7%, p = 0.03), greater torso angles (i.e., greater forward lean; 30–37%, p < 0.001), and smaller hip angle (less knee lift) in the first step (21–22%, p = 0.00). The SA task was associated with significantly longer average SLs (21–23%, p = 0.00) and significantly longer SL across all 3 steps as compared with the CODA task (17–27%, p < 0.001) A significantly increased forward lean was associated with the first step of the SA task (34%, p < 0.001) and significantly higher knee lift for the first and second steps of the SA task (11–22%, p = 0.00 and 0.04, respectively). These kinematic differences can be used for training purposes for both coaches and strength and conditioning practitioners.

Author Information

1Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

2School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia

Address correspondence to Jennifer K. Hewit,

© 2013 National Strength and Conditioning Association