Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Fit-Climbing Test: A Field Test for Indoor Rock Climbing

Bertuzzi, Rômulo; Franchini, Emerson; Tricoli, Valmor; Lima-Silva, Adriano E.; Pires, F.O.; Okuno, Nilo M.; Kiss, Maria A.P.D.M.

Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research: June 2012 - Volume 26 - Issue 6 - p 1558–1563
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318231ab37
Original Research

Abstract: Bertuzzi, R, Franchini, E, Tricoli, V, Lima-Silva, AE, Pires, FDO, Okuno, NM, and Kiss, MAPDM. Fit-climbing test: A field test for indoor rock climbing. J Strength Cond Res 26(6): 1558–1563, 2012—The aim of this study was to develop an indoor rock-climbing test on an artificial wall (Fit-climbing test). Thirteen climbers (elite group [EG] = 6; recreational group [RG] = 7) performed the following tests: (a) familiarization in the Fit-climbing test, (b) the Fit-climbing test, and (c) a retest to evaluate the Fit-climbing test's reliability. Gas exchange, blood lactate concentration, handgrip strength, and heart rate were measured during the test. Oxygen uptake during the Fit-climbing test was not different between groups (EG = 8.4 ± 1.1 L; RG = 7.9 ± 1.5 L, p > 0.05). The EG performance (120 ± 7 movements) was statistically higher than the RG climbers' performance (78 ± 13 movements) during the Fit-climbing test. Consequently, the oxygen cost per movement during the Fit-climbing test of the EG was significantly lower than that of the RG (p < 0.05). Handgrip strength was higher in the EG when compared with that in the RG in both pre-Fit- and post-Fit-climbing test (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in any other variables analyzed during the Fit-climbing test (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the performance in the Fit-climbing test presented high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97). Therefore, the performance during the Fit-climbing test may be an alternative to evaluate rock climbers because of its specificity and relation to oxygen cost per movement during climbing.

1Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

2Martial Arts and Combat Sports Research Group, Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

3Sports Science Research Group, Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceio, Brazil

4School of Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil

Address correspondence to Romulo Bertuzzi, bertuzzi@usp.br.

Copyright © 2012 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association.