You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Predicting Maximal Aerobic Capacity (VO2max) from the Critical Velocity Test in Female Collegiate Rowers

Kendall, Kristina L1; Fukuda, David H1; Smith, Abbie E3; Cramer, Joel T2; Stout, Jeffrey R1

Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318225f3ac

Kendall, KL, Fukuda, DH, Smith, AE, Cramer, JT, and Stout, JR. Predicting maximal aerobic capacity (V̇O2max) from the critical velocity test in female collegiate rowers. J Strength Cond Res 26(3): 733–738, 2012—The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between the critical velocity (CV) test and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) and develop a regression equation to predict V̇O2max based on the CV test in female collegiate rowers. Thirty-five female (mean ± SD; age, 19.38 ± 1.3 years; height, 170.27 ± 6.07 cm; body mass, 69.58 ± 0.3 1 kg) collegiate rowers performed 2 incremental V̇O2max tests to volitional exhaustion on a Concept II Model D rowing ergometer to determine V̇O2max. After a 72-hour rest period, each rower completed 4 time trials at varying distances for the determination of CV and anaerobic rowing capacity (ARC). A positive correlation was observed between CV and absolute V̇O2max (r = 0.775, p < 0.001) and ARC and absolute V̇O2max (r = 0.414, p = 0.040). Based on the significant correlation analysis, a linear regression equation was developed to predict the absolute V̇O2max from CV and ARC (absolute V̇O2max = 1.579[CV] + 0.008[ARC] − 3.838; standard error of the estimate [SEE] = 0.192 L·min−1). Cross validation analyses were performed using an independent sample of 10 rowers. There was no significant difference between the mean predicted V̇O2max (3.02 L·min−1) and the observed V̇O2max (3.10 L·min−1). The constant error, SEE and validity coefficient (r) were 0.076 L·min−1, 0.144 L·min−1, and 0.72, respectively. The total error value was 0.155 L·min−1. The positive relationship between CV, ARC, and V̇O2max suggests that the CV test may be a practical alternative to measuring the maximal oxygen uptake in the absence of a metabolic cart. Additional studies are needed to validate the regression equation using a larger sample size and different populations (junior- and senior-level female rowers) and to determine the accuracy of the equation in tracking changes after a training intervention.

Author Information

1Metabolic and Body Composition Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Huston Huffman Center, Norman, Oklahoma; 2Biophysics Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Huston Huffman Center, Norman, Oklahoma; and 3Applied Physiology Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Address correspondence to Dr. Jeffrey R. Stout,

© 2012 National Strength and Conditioning Association