Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2012 - Volume 26 - Issue 1 > Physiological Strain Associated with High-Intensity Hypoxic...
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182184fcb
Original Research

Physiological Strain Associated with High-Intensity Hypoxic Intervals in Highly Trained Young Runners

Buchheit, Martin; Kuitunen, Sami; Voss, Sven C; Williams, Benjamin K; Mendez-Villanueva, Alberto; Bourdon, Pitre C

Collapse Box


Buchheit, M, Kuitunen, S, Voss, SC, Williams, BK, Mendez- Villanueva, A, and Bourdon, PC. Physiological strain associated with high-intensity hypoxic intervals in highly trained young runners. J Strength Cond Res 26(1): 94–105, 2012—To examine the physiological strain associated with hypoxic high intensity interval training (HHIT), 8 highly trained young runners (age, 18.6 ± 5.3 years) randomly performed, 5 × 3-minute intervals in either normoxic (N, 90% of the velocity associated with V̇O2max, νV̇O2max) or hypoxic (H, simulated 2,400-m altitude, 84% of νV̇O2max) conditions. Cardiorespiratory (ventilation [V̇E], oxygen consumption [V̇O2], heart rate [HR], oxygen saturation [SpO2]), rating of central perceived exertion (RPEC) responses, changes in neutrophils, erythropoietin (EPO), blood lactate ([La]) and, bicarbonate ([HCO3]), vagal-related indices of HR variability (natural logarithm of the square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences [Ln rMSSD]) and maximal sprint and jump performances were compared after each session. Compared with N, H was associated with similar V̇E (Cohen's d ± 90% confidence limits, 0.0 ± 0.4, with % chances of higher/similar/lower values of 15/61/24) but at least lower V̇O2 (−0.8 ± 0.4, 0/0/100), HR (−0.4 ± 0.4, 1/21/78), and SpO2 (−1.8 ± 0.4, 0/0/100). Rating of perceived exertion was very likely higher (+0.5 ± 0.4, 92/8/0). Changes in [HCO3] (−0.6 ± 0.8, 5/13/83), [La] (+0.2 ± 0.4, 52/42/5), and EPO (+0.2 ± 0.4, 55/40/5) were at least possibly greater after H compared with those after N, whereas changes in neutrophils were likely lower (−0.5 ± 0.7, 4/15/81). Changes in 20-m sprint time (+0.20 ± 0.23, 49/50/1) were possibly lower after H. There was no clear difference in the changes in Ln rMSSD (+0.2 ± 1.7, 48/18/34) and jump (+0.3 ± 0.9, 60/25/15). In conclusion, although perceived as harder, HHIT is not associated with an exaggerated physiological stress in highly trained young athletes. The present results also confirm that HHIT may not be optimal for training both the cardiorespiratory and neuromuscular determinants of running performance in this population.

© 2012 National Strength and Conditioning Association



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.