Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2012 - Volume 26 - Issue 1 > Comparison of an In-Helmet Temperature Monitor System to Rec...
Text sizing:
A
A
A
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823b0a5a
Original Research

Comparison of an In-Helmet Temperature Monitor System to Rectal Temperature During Exercise

Wickwire, P Jason1; Buresh, Robert J2; Tis, Laurie L2; Collins, Mitchell A2; Jacobs, Robert D3; Bell, Marla M4

Collapse Box

Abstract

Wickwire, PJ, Buresh, RJ, Tis, LL, Collins, MA, Jacobs, RD, and Bell, MM. Comparison of an in-helmet temperature monitor system to rectal temperature during exercise. J Strength Cond Res 26(1): 1–8, 2012—Body temperature monitoring is crucial in helping to decrease the amount and severity of heat illnesses; however, a practical method of monitoring temperature is lacking. In response to the lack of a practical method of monitoring the temperature of athletes, Hothead Technologies developed a device (HOT), which continuously monitors an athlete's fluctuations in body temperature. HOT measures forehead temperature inside helmets. The purpose of this study was to compare HOT against rectal temperature (Trec). Male volunteers (n = 29, age = 23.5 ± 4.5 years, weight = 83.8 ± 10.4 kg, height = 180.1 ± 5.8 cm, body fat = 12.3 ± 4.5%) exercised on a treadmill at an intensity of 60–75% heart rate reserve (HRR) (wet bulb globe temperature [WBGT] = 28.7° C) until Trec reached 38.7° C. The correlation between Trec and HOT was 0.801 (R2 = 0.64, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 0.25, p = 0.00). One reason for this relatively high correlation is the microclimate that HOT is monitoring. HOT is not affected by the external climate greatly because of its location in the helmet. Therefore, factors such as evaporation do not alter HOT temperature to a great degree. HOT was compared with Trec in a controlled setting, and the exercise used in this study was moderate aerobic exercise, very unlike that used in football. In a controlled laboratory setting, the relationship between HOT and Trec showed favorable correlations. However, in applied settings, helmets are repeatedly removed and replaced forcing HOT to equilibrate to forehead temperature every time the helmet is replaced. Therefore, future studies are needed to mimic how HOT will be used in field situations.

© 2012 National Strength and Conditioning Association

 

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Readers Of this Article Also Read