Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Training-Induced Changes on Blood Lactate Profile and Critical Velocity in Young Swimmers

Toubekis, Argyris G1,2; Tsami, Aikaterini P1; Smilios, Ilias G1; Douda, Helen T1; Tokmakidis, Savvas P1

Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research: June 2011 - Volume 25 - Issue 6 - pp 1563-1570
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddfafc
Original Research

Toubekis, AG, Tsami, AP, Smilios, IG, Douda, HT, and Tokmakidis, SP. Training-induced changes on blood lactate profile and critical velocity in young swimmers. J Strength Cond Res 25(6): 1563-1570, 2011—This study examines the efficacy of critical swimming velocity (CV) for training prescription and monitoring the changes induced on aerobic endurance after a period of increased training volume in young swimmers. An experimental group (E: n = 7; age: 13.3 ± 1.3 years), which participated in competitive training was tested at the beginning (W0), the sixth week (W6), and 14th week (W14) to compare the changes of aerobic endurance indexes (CV; lactate threshold [LT]; velocity corresponding to blood lactate concentration of 4 mmol·L−1: V4). A control group (C: n = 7; age: 14.1 ± 1.6 years), which refrained from competitive training, was used to observe maturation effects and was tested for CV changes between W0 and W14. The average weekly training volume was increased after the sixth week in the E group and was unchanged for the C group. The CV was not different between or within groups at W0 and W14 (p > 0.05). The LT of the E group was no different compared to V4 and CV at W0 and W6 (p > 0.05) but was higher than CV at W14 (p < 0.05). The LT increased (6.5 ± 5.3%, p < 0.05), but V4 and CV were unchanged after W6 (3.6 ± 1.9%; 2.1 ± 1.2%, p > 0.05). LT, V4, and CV were unchanged despite the increased training volume from W6 to W14 (LT: 1.2 ± 4.3%, V4: 0.8 ± 1.5%, CV: 0.3 ± 0.8%; p > 0.05). These findings suggest that CV pace may be effectively used for the improvement of aerobic endurance in young swimmers. The aerobic endurance indexes used for the assessment of swimmers' progression showed different rates of change as a response to the same training stimulus and cannot be used interchangeably for training planning.

1Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Democritus University of Thrace, Komotini, Greece; and 2Department of Aquatics, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Address correspondence to Argyris G. Toubekis,

© 2011 National Strength and Conditioning Association