You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

The Effect of High- vs. Low-Intensity Training on Aerobic Capacity in Well-Trained Male Middle-Distance Runners

Enoksen, Eystein1; Shalfawi, Shaher A I2; Tønnessen, Espen3

Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc2291
Original Research
Abstract

Enoksen, E, Shalfawi, SAI, and Tønnessen, E. The effect of high- vs. low-intensity training on aerobic capacity in well-trained male middle-distance runners. J Strength Cond Res 25(3): 812-818, 2011-The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of 2 different intervention training regimes on V̇o2max, V̇o2max velocity (vV̇o2max), running economy (RE), lactic threshold velocity (vLT), and running performance on a group of well-trained male middle-distance runners in the precompetition period. Twenty-six well-trained male middle-distance runners took part in the study. All participants were tested on V̇o2max, vV̇o2max, RE, lactate threshold (LT), vLT, and a performance test. The participants were matched according to their pretest results, then randomly assigned into 1 of 2 groups, a high-volume (70 km) low-intensity training group (HVLI-group); or a high-intensity low-volume (50 km) training group (HILV-group). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups on all measures both before and after the intervention period. Furthermore, the HILV-group had a marked increase in vV̇o2max and vLT after the training period when compared with pretest. Both groups had a marked improvement in RE. The performance test showed that the HILV-group made 301 ± 886 m (1.0 ± 2.8 minutes) and the HVLI-group 218 ± 546 m (0.9 ± 1.8 minutes) in progress. The production of lactic acid was notably higher in the HILV-group (0.9 mmol) when compared with the pretest. The findings show that male middle-distance runners tested in this study improved in vV̇o2max and vLT more when they train around LT, than training with low intensity for a short period of 10 weeks.

Author Information

1Department of Physical Performance, The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway; 2Department of Physical Performance (SPU), Center for Practical Knowledge, Bodø University College, Bodø, Norway; and 3Department of Endurance Training, Norwegian Olympic Sport Center, Oslo, Norway

Address correspondence to Dr. Eystein Enoksen, eystein.enoksen@nih.no.

© 2011 National Strength and Conditioning Association