Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 2010 - Volume 24 - Issue 12 > Fructose Addition to a Glucose Supplement Modifies Perceived...
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e72769
Original Research

Fructose Addition to a Glucose Supplement Modifies Perceived Exertion During Strength and Endurance Exercise

Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo E1; Fernández, Juan M2; de Sá, Clodoaldo A1,3; Gómez-Puerto, José R1; Vaamonde, Diana4; Pérez-Jiménez, Francisco2

Collapse Box

Abstract

Da Silva-Grigoletto, ME, Fernández, JM, de Sá, CA, Gómez-Puerto, JR, Vaamonde, D, and Pérez-Jiménez, F. Fructose addition to a glucose supplement modifies perceived exertion during strength and endurance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 24(12): 3334-3342, 2010-The addition of fructose (F) to a glucose (G) supplement may modify the metabolic response during exercise; however, its effect on perceived exertion (PE) and its influence on postprandial metabolism have not been jointly studied in different types of exercise. This study sought to assess the acute effects of F addition to a G supplement on PE and on the postprandial metabolic response during a single bout of either strength exercise (SE) or endurance exercise (EE). Twenty physically trained men ingested an oral dose of G or GF 15 minutes before starting a 30-minute session of SE (10 sets of 10 repetitions of half squat) or EE (cycling). The combination resulted in 4 randomized interventions in a crossover design in which all subjects performed all experimental conditions: G + SE, GF + SE, G + EE, and GF + SE. Perceived exertion, heart rate (HR), G, insulin, lactate, and urinary catecholamine levels were measured before exercise, during the exercise, and during acute recovery. Perceived exertion during exercise was lower for GF than for G during SE and EE (mean ± SD; 8.95 ± 0.62 vs. 9.26 ± 0.65, p < 0.05 and 7.47 ± 0.84 vs. 7.74 ± 0.93, p < 0.05, respectively). The glycemic peak in GF + SE was lower than in G + SE (p < 0.05), and there was a second peak during recovery (p < 0.05), whereas in EE, no difference in blood G levels was noted between G and GF supplements. Moreover, HR, urinary adrenalin, and noradrenalin were lower in GF than in G (p < 0.05), though only for EE. The results showed that PE is positively affected by GF supplementation for both SE and EE and thus may be a useful dietary strategy for helping to achieve higher training loads.

© 2010 National Strength and Conditioning Association

 

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.