Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2009 - Volume 23 - Issue 7 > The Acute Effects of Heavy and Light Resistances on the Flig...
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3e076
Original Research

The Acute Effects of Heavy and Light Resistances on the Flight Time of a Basketball Push-Pass During Upper Body Complex Training

Matthews, Martyn; O'Conchuir, Cian; Comfort, Paul

Collapse Box

Abstract

Mathews, M, O'Conchur, C, and Comfort, P. The acute effects of heavy and light resistances on the flight time of a basketball push-pass during upper body complex training. J Strength Cond Res 23(7):1988-1995, 2009-The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effect of high-load and low-load complex training on upper-body performance-determined by the flight time of a basketball push-pass. Twelve competitive male athletes (21.8 ± 4.5 years, 82.0 ± 11.7 kg, 181.6 ± 5.6 cm), with at least 6 months weight training experience and no musculoskeletal disorders, undertook 3 testing conditions. Condition 1 involved 5 repetitions at 85% of a 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press; Condition 2 involved 5 repetitions of a 2.3-kg medicine ball push-pass; and Condition 3 was the control, where participants rested for the equivalent time of the other conditions (∼20 seconds). Each condition was preceded and followed by an electronically timed basketball push-pass. Results indicate a significant (3.99%, P = 0.001) reduction in flight time following the completion of Condition 1 (85% 1RM) but no significant changes (1.96%, P = 0.154) were seen following Condition 2 (medicine ball push-pass). Furthermore, there was a significant difference (P = 0.016) between Condition 1 (85% 1RM) and Condition 2 (medicine ball throw). This study appears to confirm previous research suggesting that high loads are required to elicit a potentiation effect. For those athletes wishing to produce a short-term enhancement of power, they should consider loads in the region of 85% 1RM. Results with the lower load showed greater variation, with some individuals responding and others not. Because there appears to be an individual potentiation response to lighter loads, we recommend that, when equipment is limited, athletes and coaches experiment with a range of loads when performing contrast training.

© 2009 National Strength and Conditioning Association

 

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.