Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2009 - Volume 23 - Issue 6 > Effects of Low- vs. High-Cadence Interval Training on Cyclin...
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3f1d3
Original Research

Effects of Low- vs. High-Cadence Interval Training on Cycling Performance

Paton, Carl D1,2; Hopkins, Will G2; Cook, Christian3

Collapse Box


Paton, CD, Hopkins, WG, and Cook, C. Effects of low- vs. high-cadence interval training on cycling performance. J Strength Cond Res 23(6): 1758-1763, 2009-High-resistance interval training produces substantial gains in sprint and endurance performance of cyclists in the competitive phase of a season. Here, we report the effect of changing the cadence of the intervals. We randomized 18 road cyclists to 2 groups for 4 weeks of training. Both groups replaced part of their usual training with 8 30-minute sessions consisting of sets of explosive single-leg jumps alternating with sets of high-intensity cycling sprints performed at either low cadence (60-70 min−1) or high cadence (110-120 min−1) on a training ergometer. Testosterone concentration was assayed in saliva samples collected before and after each session. Cycle ergometry before and after the intervention provided measures of performance (mean power in a 60-s time trial, incremental peak power, 4-mM lactate power) and physiologic indices of endurance performance (maximum oxygen uptake, exercise economy, fractional utilization of maximum oxygen uptake). Testosterone concentration in each session increased by 97% ± 39% (mean ± between-subject SD) in the low-cadence group but by only 62% ± 23% in the high-cadence group. Performance in the low-cadence group improved more than in the high-cadence group, with mean differences of 2.5% (90% confidence limits, ±4.8%) for 60-second mean power, 3.6% (±3.7%) for peak power, and 7.0% (±5.9%) for 4-mM lactate power. Maximum oxygen uptake showed a corresponding mean difference of 3.2% (±4.2%), but differences for other physiologic indices were unclear. Correlations between changes in performance and physiology were also unclear. Low-cadence interval training is probably more effective than high-cadence training in improving performance of well-trained competitive cyclists. The effects on performance may be related to training-associated effects on testosterone and to effects on maximum oxygen uptake.

© 2009 National Strength and Conditioning Association



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.