Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

An Evaluation of the Physiological Demands of Elite Rugby Union Using Global Positioning System Tracking Software

Cunniffe, Brian1,2; Proctor, Wayne2; Baker, Julien S1,3; Davies, Bruce1

Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research: July 2009 - Volume 23 - Issue 4 - pp 1195-1203
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a3928b
Original Research

Cunniffe, B, Proctor, W, Baker, JS, and Davies, B. An evaluation of the physiological demands of elite rugby union using GPS tracking software. J Strength Cond Res 23(4): 1195-1203, 2009-The current case study attempted to document the contemporary demands of elite rugby union. Players (n = 2) were tracked continuously during a competitive team selection game using Global Positioning System (GPS) software. Data revealed that players covered on average 6,953 m during play (83 minutes). Of this distance, 37% (2,800 m) was spent standing and walking, 27% (1,900 m) jogging, 10% (700 m) cruising, 14% (990 m) striding, 5% (320 m) high-intensity running, and 6% (420 m) sprinting. Greater running distances were observed for both players (6.7% back; 10% forward) in the second half of the game. Positional data revealed that the back performed a greater number of sprints (>20 km·h−1) than the forward (34 vs. 19) during the game. Conversely, the forward entered the lower speed zone (6-12 km·h−1) on a greater number of occasions than the back (315 vs. 229) but spent less time standing and walking (66.5 vs. 77.8%). Players were found to perform 87 moderate-intensity runs (>14 km·h−1) covering an average distance of 19.7 m (SD = 14.6). Average distances of 15.3 m (back) and 17.3 m (forward) were recorded for each sprint burst (>20 km·h−1), respectively. Players exercised at ∼80 to 85% V̇o2max during the course of the game with a mean heart rate of 172 b·min1 (∼88% HRmax). This corresponded to an estimated energy expenditure of 6.9 and 8.2 MJ, back and forward, respectively. The current study provides insight into the intense and physical nature of elite rugby using “on the field” assessment of physical exertion. Future use of this technology may help practitioners in design and implementation of individual position-specific training programs with appropriate management of player exercise load.

1Department of Health, Exercise, Sport and Science, University of Glamorgan, Trefforest, Wales CF37 1DL, UK; 2Wales Rugby Union, Vale of Glamorgan, Wales CF72 8JY, UK; and 3Division of Sport and Exercise School of Engineering & Science, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, Scotland, UK

Address correspondence to Brian Cunniffe,

© 2009 National Strength and Conditioning Association