You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

FAMILIARIZATION AND RELIABILITY OF MULTIPLE SPRINT RUNNING PERFORMANCE INDICES.

GLAISTER, MARK; HOWATSON, GLYN; LOCKEY, RICHARD A.; ABRAHAM, CORINNE S.; GOODWIN, JON E.; MCINNES, GILLIAN
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
ORIGINAL RESEARCH: PDF Only
Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the time-course of the familiarization process associated with a test of multiple sprint running performance and to determine the reliability of various performance indices once familiarization had been established. Eleven physically active men (mean age: 21 +/- 2 years) completed 4 multiple sprint running trials (12 X 30 m; repeated at 35-s intervals) with 7 days between trials. All testing was conducted indoors, and times were recorded by twin-beam photocells. Results revealed no apparent learning effects as evidenced by no significant (p > 0.05) between-trial differences in measures of fastest or mean 30-m sprint time. Within-subject test-retest reliability determined over 4 trials by coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed excellent reliability for measures of fastest and mean sprint times (CV range: 1.34-2.24%; ICC range: 0.79-0.94). Pre- and posttrial blood lactate concentrations showed good reliability when judged in context with typical values (CV range: 12.08-18.21%; ICC range: 0.72-0.78). In contrast, and in line with previous research, fatigue data showed much greater variability (CV: 26.43%; ICC: 0.66). The results of this study suggest that high degrees of test-retest reliability can be obtained in many multiple sprint running indices without the need for prior familiarization.

(C) 2007 National Strength and Conditioning Association