Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2002 - Volume 16 - Issue 1 > Explosive Strength Deficit as a Predictor of Vertical Jumpin...
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
Original Article: PDF Only

Explosive Strength Deficit as a Predictor of Vertical Jumping Performance.


Collapse Box


Currently, variables predictive of vertical jumping performance can account for only part of its total variability. A potential additional source of variation called explosive strength deficit (ESD) was described in 1995 by Zatsiorsky (Science and Practice of Strength Training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1995. pp. 34-35.). ESD is determined by measuring the maximum force generated under ideal circumstances (Fmm) and under task-relevant conditions (Fm). It is calculated as 100(Fmm - Fm)/Fm. For this study, the following operational definitions were used: Fmm = squatting peak force at 0.51 m[middle dot]s-1; Fm = squatting peak force at 1.43 m[middle dot]s-1. Data were analyzed using forward stepwise multiple regression. Mean ESD for men was 29.7% (SD = 11.7) and for women was 49.3% (SD = 11.2). For men and women, respectively, zero-order correlations for ESD with restricted vertical jumping (RVJ) distance were -0.35 and -0.60, and between ESD and drop vertical jumping (DVJ) distance were -0.20 and -0.63. However, when the previously identified predictors were taken into account, ESD was not a significant predictor (p > 0.05) of either type of jump. Therefore, it was concluded that ESD on the basis of velocity-regulated squats does not augment the explained variance previously established for vertical jumping performance.

(C) 2002 National Strength and Conditioning Association



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.