You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

The Impact of Various Anthropometric and Flexibility Measurements on the Sit-and-Reach Test.

Simoneau, Guy G.
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
Original Article: PDF Only

This study sought to determine which components of anthropometry and leg/back flexibility best contribute to performance of the sit-and-reach (S&R). It also examined relationships among selected back and lower extremity flexibility tests. Thirty-four healthy college-age women performed 5 flexibility tests: (a) S&R, (b) Schober-L for lumbar spine flexibility, (c) Schober-L+T for thoracic and lumbar spine flexibility, (d) straight-leg raise (SLR) for hamstring flexibility, and (e) ankle dorsiflexion (DF) for ankle plantar-flexor flexibility. Statistical analysis included the use of correlation matrices among all measurements of flexibility and anthropometry. Also, a stepwise regression model was used to establish the best flexibility and anthropometric predictors of performance on the S&R. The level of association between S&R and SLR performance was found to be r = 0.78 (p < 0.01). All other flexibility tests and anthropometry variables (leg and arm length) were not as well associated with S&R performance. In conclusion, S&R performance was almost exclusively determined by hamstring flexibility. Also, ankle plantar-flexor, hamstring, and back flexibility were poorly correlated, indicating a need for specific flexibility measurements on each joint or muscle group.

(C) 1998 National Strength and Conditioning Association