You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Effects of Fatigue on Performance and Learning of a Gross Motor Task.

Berger, Richard A.; Smith-Hale, Lois A.
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
Article: PDF Only
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of fatigue on motor performance and learning of a gross motor task. Thirty-two college men (20.1 +/- 1.9 years) practiced a task involving repetitive displacement of body weight over a four-week period. The task required hopping on one or both feet to a sequence of 32 footprints painted on a patterned board. Correct placement of the feet on the footprints was the response score used to assess performance and learning. Subjects were randomly assigned either to a group (F-P) that was fatigued before practice or to a control group (C). Fatigue levels were leg strength decrements of 20 percent or 40 percent of maximum strength. A maximum number of repetitions was performed with loads of 80 percent or 60 percent of maximum strength to achieve, respectively, a 20 percent or 40 percent strength decrement on the last repetition. Subjects in Group C were divided into two subgroups (n = 8), with one experiencing fatigue (30 percent strength decrement) immediately after practice. Comparisons between the two subgroups after four weeks disclosed significant differences (p < 0.05) in leg strength favoring the fatigued subgroup but no difference in performance or learning. Leg strength was not considered a learning variable. No significant differences were found in performance or learning between subjects in Group F-P who were fatigued to 20 percent or 40 percent strength decrement. Subgroup comparisons in Group C verifying that strength was not a learning variable and in Group F-P that 20 percent and 40 percent strength decrements did not have differential effects supported the use of a 2 by 5 ANOVA to analyze test scores recorded under nonfatigued trials. Significant differences were found between Groups F-P (mean = 8.90) and C (mean = 10.95) (p < 0.05), and among the five testing sessions in performance and learning. Fatigue was considered a performance and learning variable.

(C) 1991 National Strength and Conditioning Association