Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 1991 - Volume 5 - Issue 1 > Push-ups As a Measure of Upper Body Strength.
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research:
Article: PDF Only

Push-ups As a Measure of Upper Body Strength.

Mayhew, J. L.; Ball, T. E.; Arnold, M. D.; Bowen, J. C.

Collapse Box


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using push-ups to predict one-repetition maximum (1 RM) concentric bench press performance. College males (n = 106 enrolled in a basic fitness course were evaluated for a 1 RM bench press with free weights and for maximum one-minute push-up performance. Push-ups were adjusted for body height (PU[middle dot]cm), body mass (PU[middle dot]kg), lean body mass (PU[middle dot]kg LBM) and height and body mass (PU[middle dot]cm[middle dot]kg[middle dot]100-1). Push-ups were only moderately related (r = 0.47) to bench press. The correlations between adjusted push-ups and bench press were r = 0.49 (PU[middle dot]cm), r = 0.71(PU[middle dot]kg), r = 0.65 (PU[middle dot]kg LBM) and r = 0.71 (PU[middle dot]cm[middle dot]kg[middle dot]100-1). Cross-validation (n = 53) of the prediction equation developed from the original sample (PU[middle dot]kg) and the equation proposed by Dean et al. were moderately successful (r = 0.70 for both). However, the standard errors of estimate were +/- 15.7 kg for each equation, although the Dean et al. equation significantly overestimated bench press performance. Because of the large error noted when predicting 1 RM bench press, push-ups are not an accurate reflection of upper body strength in young males.

(C) 1991 National Strength and Conditioning Association



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.