Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Supplements Collections Podcasts For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 1995 - Volume 36 - Issue 4 > The Detection and Management of Intracranial Hypertension af...
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Neurosurgery:
April 1995 - Volume 36 - Issue 4 - p 703-709
Clinical Study

The Detection and Management of Intracranial Hypertension after Initial Suture Release and Decompression for Craniofacial Dysostosis Syndromes

Siddiqi, Shah N. M.D.; Posnick, Jeffrey C. D.M.D., M.D.; Buncic, Ray M.D.; Humphreys, Robin P. M.D.; Hoffman, Harold J. M.D.; Drake, James M. M.B., Ch.B.; Rutka, James T. M.D., Ph.D.

Collapse Box

Abstract

WE PERFORMED A retrospective study of 107 consecutive patients with syndromic forms of craniosynostosis (craniofacial dysostosis) seen by the craniofacial team at the Hospital for Sick Children between 1986 and 1992. There were 51 patients with Crouzon's syndrome, 33 with Apert's syndrome, 8 with Pfeiffer syndrome, 11 with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and 4 with kleeblättschadel anomaly. Six patients developed raised intracranial pressure (ICP) after initial suture release and decompression (Apert's syndrome, three patients; Pfeiffer syndrome, one patient; Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, two patients). Raised ICP was considered in those children who returned with a bulging fontanelle, progressive frontal bone protrusion, intermittent headaches, irritability, and vomiting. The diagnosis of raised ICP was based on papilledema (four patients), progressive macrocephaly (one patient), and ICP monitoring (one patient). No child in this group had hydrocephalus requiring cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Once raised ICP was detected in these children, a second operation was immediately performed to reduce the ICP with the intention of expanding the volume of the cranial cavity. The second procedures included: anterior cranial vault and upper orbital reshaping (four patients), posterior cranial vault reshaping (one patient), and total cranial vault reshaping (one patient). There were no perioperative complications in these patients, although one patient showed subsequent recurrence of raised ICP requiring further cranial vault re-expansion. At follow-up, ranging from 3 to 7 years, all six patients were asymptomatic without evidence of raised ICP. In our series, raised ICP occurred in 6% of the children with a craniofacial dysostosis syndrome after initial suture release and decompression. Accordingly, all children undergoing an early suture release and reshaping procedure for a craniofacial dysostosis syndrome require serial neurosurgical, craniofacial, and neuro-opthalmological examinations postoperatively. Despite an initial suture release and reshaping procedure in craniofacial dysostosis syndrome patients, the cranial vault may lack adequate growth potential to accommodate the growing brain. Appropriate timing of the revision craniotomy and reshaping procedure can prevent irreversible complications.

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Login




Help

Forgot Password?

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.