Occipital Condyle Fractures

Theodore, Nicholas MD*; Aarabi, Bizhan MD, FRCSC; Dhall, Sanjay S. MD§; Gelb, Daniel E. MD; Hurlbert, R. John MD, PhD, FRCSC; Rozzelle, Curtis J. MD#; Ryken, Timothy C. MD, MS**; Walters, Beverly C. MD, MSc,FRCSC‡‡,§§; Hadley, Mark N. MD§§

doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182775527
Chapter 9

*Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona;

Department of Neurosurgery, and

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland;

§Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary Spine Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;

#Division of Neurological Surgery, and

§§Division of Neurological Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Alabama, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama;

**Iowa Spine & Brain Institute, University of Iowa, Waterloo/Iowa City, Iowa;

‡‡Department of Neurosciences, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia

Correspondence: Mark N. Hadley, MD, FACS, UAB Division of Neurological Surgery, 510 – 20th Street South, FOT 1030, Birmingham, AL 35294-3410. E-mail: mhadley@uabmc.edu

Article Outline
Back to Top | Article Outline



Level II:

* Computed tomographic (CT) imaging is recommended to establish the diagnosis of occipital condyle fractures (OCFs).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Level III:

* Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended to assess the integrity of the craniocervical ligaments.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Level III:

* External cervical immobilization is recommended for all types of OCFs. More rigid external immobilization in a halo vest device should be considered for bilateral OCF.

* Halo vest immobilization or occipitocervical stabilization and fusion are recommended for injuries with associated atlanto occipital ligamentous injury or evidence of instability.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Acute traumatic OCF was first described by Bell in 1817. More frequent observations of this injury have been reported during the past 2 decades. Improvements in CT imaging technology and the use of CT imaging of head-injury patients that includes visualization of the craniovertebral junction have resulted in more frequent recognition of this injury. Despite this, acute traumatic OCF remains an infrequent occurrence.

An analysis of all of the reported cases of OCF in the scientific literature may facilitate development of diagnostic and treatment recommendations for this disorder and is undertaken in this review. Specific questions that were evaluated include: accuracy of plain radiographs and CT imaging in the diagnosis of OCF, and the safety and efficacy of various treatment strategies for OCF including no treatment, traction, external immobilization, and surgical decompression with internal fixation and fusion.

The guidelines author group of the Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) produced a medical evidence-based guideline on this topic in 2002.1 The purpose of the current review is to update the medical evidence on the diagnosis and treatment of OCF since that early publication.

Back to Top | Article Outline


A National Library of Medicine (Pubmed) computerized literature search of publications from 1966 to 2011 was performed using the following headings: occipital bone and fracture (spinal, skull, or fracture alone), and led to 2105 and 71 182 citations, respectively. A subset of 235 citations contained both headings. The bibliographies of the identified articles were scanned to identify additional citations. The articles were reviewed using the following criteria for potential inclusion in diagnosis: human subjects, type of fracture, and tomographic or plain radiographic findings. The articles were separately considered for inclusion in treatment within the following parameters: human subjects, type of fracture, management, and outcome. The observations from all of the citations were combined because the usual methods for analysis were precluded by the infrequent occurrence of this injury type. Fifty-one articles met the selection criteria. All but 2 articles contained Class III medical evidence of either single case studies or case series. The 2 exceptions were prospective studies to evaluate the use of clinical criteria in blunt trauma patients to prompt CT imaging of the skull base.2,3 The duration of follow-up in the clinical articles ranged from not reported to 5 years. The data provided by these reports were compiled and make up the basis for this guideline. Summaries of the articles are provided in Evidentiary Table format (Table).

Back to Top | Article Outline


OCFs have been classified by Anderson and Montesano4 into 3 types: Type I (comminuted), Type II (extension of a linear basilar skull fracture), and Type III (avulsion of a fragment). The current literature review identified 415 patients reported to have OCF. Clinical series and case reports provided data on 84 Type I, 125 Type II, 207 Type III unilateral OC fractures, 37 bilateral OCFs, and 2 old fractures.

OCFs are relatively uncommon injuries. Various reports have estimated a 1% to 3% frequency of OCF in patients sustaining blunt craniocervical trauma.5,6 Link et al described the results of craniocervical CT imaging on 202 consecutive acute blunt patients with a Glasgow Coma Score between 3 and 6.3 OCF was identified in 9 of the 202 impaired patients they imaged (4.4%). In 1997, Bloom et al performed a prospective study, with 1 year follow-up to identify the frequency of OCF in patients meeting certain clinical criteria.2 Fifty-five consecutive patients with high-energy blunt craniocervical trauma underwent thin-section craniocervical junction CT imaging. Supplemental criteria included reduced Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on admission, occipitocervical tenderness, reduced craniocervical motion, lower cranial nerve abnormality, and retropharyngeal soft tissue swelling (STS). Nine (16.4%) of 55 patients meeting their criteria following trauma were identified with OCF. In 2009, Malhan et al, determined that the incidence of OCF was 1.7/1000 trauma patients per year.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Plain radiographs of the cervical spine were reported to have been performed in 359 patients culled from the literature review. These radiographs were reported as “normal” in 42 patients. Twenty-four patients had prevertebral STS.7-10 Forty-eight OCF injury patients were reported to have sustained multiple cervical fractures. Associated fractures reported with OCF included fractures of the: atlas (n = 22); Type II odontoid (n = 7); axis (n = 14); isolated subaxial fractures (n = 13); and an unspecified cervical fracture (n = 1). Seven patients had atlantoaxial widening and 1 had a C5-6 subluxation without fracture.

Only 3 patients with OCF had their injury directly identified on plain radiographs of the skull or of the cervical spine.11,12 The results of plain radiographs were not reported in 141 patients with OCF. The calculated sensitivity of plain radiographs from these reports aiding in the diagnosis of OCF is 1.4% (3 of 218). Since the data were obtained from case reports and case series of patients known to have OCF, comparison with the findings of plain radiographs in patients without OCF could not be accomplished. As a result, calculations of specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of plain x-rays for OCF could not be performed.

Three hundred sixty-three of the reported patients with OCF underwent CT imaging. Two patients had OCF diagnosed from retrospective review of CT images that were initially interpreted as normal. The diagnosis of OCF could be made in every patient with OCF on whom a CT scan was performed. The collective evidence (including several recent comparative studies) derived from the 363 cases identified in the literature review suggests that the sensitivity for CT imaging to depict OCF is 100%, and provides Class II medical evidence on this issue.

Only 59 patients with OCF have been reported to have been studied with MRI. Cervicomedullary hemorrhages were identified in 13 patients, 12 had a retrodental hemorrhage, 1 had a torn tectorial membrane, 4 identified the fracture (3 displaced), 24 had prevertebral or nuchal ligament edema and hemorrhage, and 5 patients had normal imaging. Acute MRI has been infrequently reported after OCF (11 described in various reports); therefore, no inferences about the role of early MRI in this setting can be offered. In 1997, Tuli et al proposed a new classification scheme using MRI to differentiate stable from unstable OCF (41). However, the case example they cited had concurrent atlantoaxial instability (rather than isolated atlanto-occipital instability).

Clinical clues suggesting OCF are variable and have not been consistently documented in the literature. Of the 415 patients with OCF described in the literature, there is detailed clinical information provided on only 119 patients. Loss of consciousness (poor GCS) was reported in 36 patients (30%). Thirty-five patients were reportedly normal (30%). Forty-eight had neurological deficits (40%), including acute or delayed cranial nerve deficits alone, cranial nerve deficits with limb weakness, mild to severe limb weakness without cranial nerve deficits, vertigo, hyperreflexia, and diplopia. Neck pain was reported as a consistent feature of OCF in responsive patients. Only 4 patients were described who did not complain of occipitocervical pain in the absence of significantly impaired consciousness.8,10,13 Of these 4 patients, 1 was intoxicated, 1 had severe extremity injury pain, and the other 2 had severe facial trauma.

In summary, the diagnosis of OCF is rarely made on plain radiographs. Evaluation of the craniocervical junction utilizing multiplanar CT with reconstruction images is recommended to evaluate for the presence of OCF. Blunt trauma patients sustaining high-energy craniocervical injuries are more likely to sustain OCF. Consequently, cranial imaging of these patients should include CT imaging of the craniocervical junction. Clinical criteria including altered consciousness, occipital pain or tenderness, impaired craniocervical motion, lower cranial nerve paresis, and neurological deficits potentially referable to the proximal spinal cord should prompt CT imaging of the craniocervical junction to exclude OCF.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Of the 415 patients with OCF reported in the literature, treatment information is offered on 259 patients. Follow-up of these patients ranged from not reported to 5 years duration. Forty-three OCF patients (2 Type I; 14 Type II; 5 Type III; and 22 unknown type) did not receive treatment. Nine of these patients (1 Type I; 4 Type II; and 4 Type III) on whom clinical follow-up was described developed cranial nerve deficits within days to weeks after injury.6,14-21 One hypoglossal nerve palsy resolved, 2 hypoglossal nerve deficits improved, 3 other cranial nerve deficits persisted (2 hypoglossal, 1 glossopharyngeal and 1 vagal), and 3 outcomes were not reported. Six additional patients were identified in the literature with untreated OCF who developed delayed deficits or symptoms. Two of these initially untreated patients (1 Type II and 1 Type III) developed multiple lower cranial nerve deficits that reportedly improved with 6 weeks of cervical immobilization.22 Another initially untreated patient (Type III) developed vertigo 3 months after injury that resolved after 8 weeks of collar immobilization.23 One patient (Type III) developed nystagmus and a lateral rectus palsy after precautionary collar immobilization was discontinued. The deficit resolved after resuming cervical immobilization.24 One patient (Type III) developed double vision during cervical traction, which resolved with surgical decompression.21 Finally, 1 patient (Type III) developed delayed vagal, spinal accessory and hypoglossal nerve palsies during cervical immobilization in a cervical collar.25 The cranial nerve X and XI palsies improved. However, the hypoglossal palsy persisted at 1 year.

One hundred ninety patients with OCF, including several patients with bilateral OCF injuries, were initially treated with cervical collar immobilization. Outcome following treatment was inconsistently reported. Sixty-eight with OCF treated with a collar on whom follow-up information was provided had complete recovery at last follow-up. Another patient had modest reduction of neck rotation after treatment. One patient had a hypoglossal nerve deficit at 50 months follow-up.26 Two patients were described who had persistent mild dysphonia.27 Three had persistent neck pain. Two of the 3 were unable return to work; however, 1 was reportedly without disability.28

Thirty-two patients with OCF were treated with halo/Minerva immobilization devices. One of those patients had slight improvement of Collet-Sicard syndrome at last follow-up.26 Another was reported with persistent trapezius weakness.27 Two other patients were reported to have chronic neck pain. Two patients were reported to have had a complete recovery at last follow-up.28

Of 37 patients with bilateral OCF reported in the literature, there is some treatment data on 29 patients. In the single largest series of these patients, Hanson et al described 22 patients with bilateral occipito-atlanto-axial injuries in a series of 95 OCF patients. Four of these patients died, 8 underwent occipitocervical fusion, and 4 were treated with halo immobilization. OCF patients in Hanson et al's series included patients with atlanto-occipital dislocation, precluding the ability to identify a treatment distinction between these 2 diagnoses.29 In the remaining 7 bilateral OCF cases, there was 1 report of halo immobilization and 6 cases of conservative management, which was defined as either a rigid cervical orthosis or, “no specific treatment”.27,30 The patient who was treated with halo immobilization had a good outcome. In the conservatively treated group, there was 1 case of dysphonia at 2-year follow-up.

Seventeen patients with OCF were treated with surgery. Fourteen of them were treated with occipitocervical internal fixation and fusion (1 unknown type, 2 Type II and 11 type III OCF injuries). Three of these patients underwent surgery for decompression of the brainstem (1 type II and 2 type III injuries), in addition to internal fixation and fusion. Surgery was offered in the setting of craniocervical misalignment in 2 cases, associated C1 and C2 fracture in 1 case,30 displaced fractures with ligamentous instability in another 3 cases,10,31 and in 8 patients with bilateral or occipitoatlantal/atlantoaxial joint space widening in association with OCF.29

One patient with delayed diplopia had symptom resolution after removal of the fracture fragment,21 while 1 patient with lower cranial nerve deficits32 and 1 with diplopia and hemiparesis23 remained unchanged several days after surgery. One patient who was neurologically intact remained so following occipitocervical fusion.31 There is no reported follow-up for the remainder of the OCF patients treated surgically.

In summary, 12 of 15 patients who developed delayed symptoms or deficits were not initially treated. Only 3 of these 12 patients were subsequently treated with cervical immobilization. All 3 improved. In comparison, only 3 of 6 patients demonstrated improvement in deficits without treatment. Only 1 patient (OCF Type III) developed a deficit during treatment that persisted (hypoglossal nerve palsy) despite collar use. Only 3 patients underwent surgery for decompression of the brainstem, 1 of whom had immediate and lasting improvement in symptoms post-operatively. Nonoperative treatment with external cervical immobilization is almost always sufficient to promote bony union/healing and recovery or cranial nerve deficit improvement in all types of OCF. Isolated bilateral OCF should prompt consideration of more rigid external immobilization. Patients shown to have unilateral or bilateral OCF associated with occipitoatlantal injury may require surgical stabilization (occipitocervical internal fixation and fusion), or halo-vest immobilization, depending upon the extent of the injury. It is important to note that the presence of OCF should raise the suspicion for the potential of associated atlanto-occipital dislocation; however, either of these 2 traumatic injuries may be present independently.

Back to Top | Article Outline


OCF is an uncommon injury and requires CT imaging to establish the diagnosis. Patients sustaining high-energy blunt craniocervical trauma, particularly in the setting of loss of consciousness, impaired consciousness, occipitocervical pain or motion impairment, and lower cranial nerve deficits, should undergo CT imaging of the craniocervical junction. Untreated patients with OCF can develop lower cranial nerve deficits that usually recover or improve with external immobilization. Nonsurgical treatment with external cervical immobilization is sufficient in nearly all types of OCF. Bilateral OCF injuries should prompt consideration for more rigid external immobilization in a halo vest device. Surgical treatment (cranio-cervical internal fixation and fusion) may be indicated in patients with OCF who have overt instability, neural compression from displaced fracture fragments, or who have associated occipital-atlantal or atlanto-axial injuries.

Back to Top | Article Outline


CT imaging with 3-dimensional reconstruction is essential for the diagnosis of OCF. MRI is useful for the diagnosis of ligamentous and other soft tissue injuries, including injuries of the spinal cord. Because OCF injuries remain relatively infrequent, cooperative retrospective collection of CT, MRI, and treatment and outcome data in patients with OCF is recommended.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors have no personal financial or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Occipital condyle fractures. In: Guidelines for the management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery. 2002;50(3 suppl):S114–S119.
2. Bloom AI, Neeman Z, Slasky BS, et al.. Fracture of the occipital condyles and associated craniocervical ligament injury: incidence, CT imaging and implications. Clin Radiol. 1997;52(3):198–202.
3. Link TM, Schuierer G, Hufendiek A, Horch C, Peters PE. Substantial head trauma: value of routine CT examination of the cervicocranium. Radiology. 1995;196(3):741–745.
4. Anderson PA, Montesano PX. Morphology and treatment of occipital condyle fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13(2):731–736.
5. Leone A, Cerase A, Colosimo C, Lauro L, Puca A, Marano P. Occipital condylar fractures: a review. Radiology. 2000;216(3):635–644.
6. Noble ER, Smoker WR. The forgotten condyle: the appearance, morphology, and classification of occipital condyle fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(3):507–513.
7. Harding-Smith J, MacIntosh PK, Sherbon KJ. Fracture of the occipital condyle. A case report and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(2):1170–1171.
8. Mariani PJ. Occipital condyle fracture presenting as retropharyngeal hematoma. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19(12):1447–1449.
9. Mody BS, Morris EW. Fracture of the occipital condyle: case report and review of the world literature. Injury. 1992;23(5):350–352.
10. Tuli S, Tator CH, Fehlings MG, Mackay M. Occipital condyle fractures. Neurosurgery. 1997;41(2):368–377.
11. Jones DN, Knox AM, Sage MR. Traumatic avulsion fracture of the occipital condyles and clivus with associated unilateral atlantooccipital distraction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990;11(6):1181–1183.
12. Wani MA, Tandon PN, Banerji AK, Bhatia R. Collet-Sicard syndrome resulting from closed head injury: case report. J Trauma. 1991;31(10):1437–1439.
13. Olsson R, Kunz R. Fracture of the occipital condyle as an incidental finding during CT-evaluation of a maxillary fracture. Acta Radiol. 1994;35(1):90–91.
14. Bolender N, Cromwell LD, Wendling L. Fracture of the occipital condyle. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978;131(4):729–731.
15. Castling B, Hicks K. Traumatic isolated unilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy—case report and review of the literature. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;33(3):171–173.
16. Deeb ZL, Rothfus WE, Goldberg AL, Dafner RH. Occult occipital condyle fractures presenting as tumors. J Comput Tomogr. 1988;12(4):261–263.
17. Demisch S, Lindner A, Beck R, Zierz S. The forgotten condyle: delayed hypogloassal nerve palsy caused by fracture of the occipital condyle. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1998;100(1):44–45.
18. Orbay T, Aykol S, Seçkin Z, Ergün R. Late hypoglossal nerve palsy following fracture of the occipital condyle. Surg Neurol. 1989;31(5):402–404.
19. Paley MD, Wood GA. Traumatic bilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;33(4):239–241.
20. Urculo E, Arrazola M, Arrazola M Jr, Riu I, Moyua A. Delayed glossopharyngeal and vagus nerve paralysis following occipital condyle fracture. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1996;84(3):522–525.
21. Wasserberg J, Bartlett RJ. Occipital condyle fractures diagnosed by high-definition CT and coronal reconstructions. Neuroradiology. 1995;37(5):370–373.
22. Legros B, Fournier P, Chiaroni P, Ritz O, Fusciardi J. Basal fracture of the skull and lower (IX, X, XI, XII) cranial nerves palsy: four case reports including two fractures of the occipital condyle—a literature review. J Trauma. 2000;48(2):342–348.
23. Bozboga M, Unal F, Hepgul K, Izgi N, Turantan MI, Turker K. Fracture of the occipital condyle. Case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17(9):1119–1121.
24. Desai SS, Coumas JM, Danylevich A, Hayes E, Dunn EJ. Fracture of the occipital condyle: case report and review of the literature. J Trauma. 1990;30(2):240–241.
25. Bridgman SA, McNab W. Traumatic occipital condyle fracture, multiple cranial nerve palsies, and torticollis: a case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 1992;38(2):152–156.
26. Caroli E, Rocchi G, Orlando ER, Delfini R. Occipital condyle fractures: report of five cases and literature review. Eur Spine J. 2005;14(5):487–492.
27. Capuano C, Costagliola C, Shamsaldin M, Maleci A, Di Lorenzo N. Occipital condyle fractures: a hidden nosologic entity. An experience with 10 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004;146(8):779–784.
28. Malham GM, Ackland HM, Jones R, Williamson OD, Varma DK. Occipital condyle fractures: incidence and clinical follow-up at a level 1 trauma centre. Emerg Radiol. 2009;16(4):291–297.
29. Hanson JA, Deliganis AV, Baxter AB, et al.. Radiologic and clinical spectrum of occipital condyle fractures: retrospective review of 107 consecutive fractures in 95 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(5):1261–1268.
30. Maserati MB, Stephens B, Zohny Z, et al.. Occipital condyle fractures: clinical decision rule and surgical management. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11(4):388–395.
31. Maughan PH, Horn EM, Theodore N, Feiz-Erfan I, Sonntag VK. Avulsion fracture of the foramen magnum treated with occiput-to-c1 fusion: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(3):E600; discussion E600.
32. Sharma BS, Mahajan RK, Bhatia S, Khosla VK. Collet-Sicard syndrome after closed head injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1994;96(2):197–198.
33. Aulino JM, Tutt LK, Kaye JJ, Smith PW, Morris JA Jr. Occipital condyle fractures: clinical presentation and imaging findings in 76 patients. Emerg Radiol. 2005;11(6):342–347.
34. Ide C, Nisolle JF, Misson N, et al.. Unusual occipitoatlantal fracture dissociation with no neurological impairment. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1998;88(4):773–776.
35. Cottalorda J, Allard D, Dutour N. Fracture of the occipital condyle. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996;5(1):61–63.
36. Lam CH, Stratford J. Bilateral hypoglossal nerve injury with occipital condylar fracture. Can J Neurol Sci. 1996;23(2):145–148.
37. Emery E, Saillant G, Ismail M, Fohanno D, Roy-Camille R. Fracture of the occipital condyle: case report and review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 1995;4(3):191–193.
38. Stroobants J, Fidlers L, Storms JL, Klaes R, Dua G, Van Hoye M. High cervical pain and impairment of skull mobility as the only symptoms of an occipital condyle fracture. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1994;81(1):137–138.
39. Young WF, Rosenwasser RH, Getch C, Jallo J. Diagnosis and management of occipital condyle fractures. Neurosurgery. 1994;34(2):257–260; discussion 260-261.
40. Mann FA, Cohen W. Occipital condyle fracture: significance in the assessment of occipitoatlantal stability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(1):193–194.
41. Massaro F, Lanotte M. Fracture of the occipital condyle. Injury. 1993;24(6):419–420.
42. Raila FA, Aitken AT, Vickers GN. Computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction in the evaluation of occipital condyle fracture. Skeletal Radiol. 1993;22(4):269–271.
43. Bettini N, Malaguti MC, Sintini M, Monti C. Fractures of the occipital condyles: report of four cases and review of the literature. Skeletal Radiol. 1993;22(3):187–190.
44. Leventhal MR, Boydston WR, Sebes JI, Pinstein ML, Watridge CB, Lowrey R. The diagnosis and treatment of fractures of the occipital condyle. Orthopedics. 1992;15(8):944–947.
45. Wessels LS. Fracture of the occipital condyle. A report of 3 cases. S Afr J Surg. 1990;28(4):155–156.
46. Valaskatzis EP, Hammer AJ. Fracture of the occipital condyle. A case report. S Afr Med J. 1990;77(1):47–48.
47. Savolaine ER, Ebraheim NA, Jackson WT, Rusin JJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography in evaluation of occipital condyle fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3(1):71–75.
48. Curri D, Cervellini P, Zanusso M, Benedetti A. Isolated fracture of occipital condyle. Case report. J Neurosurg Sci. 1988;32(4):157–159.
49. Hashimoto T, Watanabe O, Takase M, Koniyama J, Kobota M. Collet-Sicard syndrome after minor head trauma. Neurosurgery. 1988;23(3):367–370.
50. Spencer JA, Yeakley JW, Kaufman HH. Fracture of the occipital condyle. Neurosurgery. 1984;15(1):101–103.
51. Goldstein SJ, Woodring JH, Young AB. Occipital condyle fracture associated with cervical spine injury. Surg Neurol. 1982;17(5):350–352.

Cervical immobilization; CT imaging; Occipital condyle fracture

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons