Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 2013 - Volume 73 - Issue 6 > Futility in Neurosurgery: A Patient-Centered Approach
doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000014
Special Article

Futility in Neurosurgery: A Patient-Centered Approach

Honeybul, Stephen FRCS (SN), FRACS*; Gillett, Grant R. FRACS, MPhil; Ho, Kwok FRCICM, PhD§

Collapse Box


The concept of futility has been a source of discussion for many years. Even though it is tempting to propose that an action or clinical intervention should be deemed futile if it does not achieve the goals of that action, further clarification is needed in terms of the nature of the likely outcomes of an intervention and the probabilities of various outcomes being achieved. The outcome, in an age of balance between autonomy and necessity, should, at a minimum, be acceptable to the person on whom the intervention is to be performed. This is especially the case when considering outcome following decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury, in which certain outcomes are likely to be severely impaired states that the patient would consider unacceptable. In this article, we use some key ethical concepts such as substantial benefit and the risk of unbearable badness to explore the concept of futility in severe traumatic brain injury and, by linking that to recent advances in neurosurgical science, propose a pragmatic patient-centered approach to deal with the concept of futility.

ABBREVIATIONS: ICP, intracranial pressure

mRS, modified Rankin Score

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.