Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Supplements Collections Podcasts Video Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > May 2013 - Volume 72 - Issue 5 > Factors Affecting Successful Localization of the Central Sul...
Neurosurgery:
doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182897447
Research-Human-Clinical Studies

Factors Affecting Successful Localization of the Central Sulcus Using the Somatosensory Evoked Potential Phase Reversal Technique

Sheth, Sameer A. MD, PhD*; Eckhardt, Christine A. BS*; Walcott, Brian P. MD*; Eskandar, Emad N. MD*; Simon, Mirela V. MD, MSc

Collapse Box

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perirolandic surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative neurological deficit that can be reduced by accurate recognition of the location of sensorimotor cortex. The median somatosensory evoked potential (MSSEP) phase reversal technique (PRT) reliably identifies the central sulcus (CS) intraoperatively, but does require additional surgical time. Awareness of factors that lengthen the time required for MSSEP PRT has important implications for surgical planning.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that affect the time required for CS localization via MSSEP PRT.

METHODS: Multivariate Cox regression analysis, applied in 100 consecutive cases of perirolandic surgery at a single institution from 2005 to 2010, during which CS localization was attempted via a standardized MSSEP PRT.

RESULTS: The CS was reliably identified in 77 cases. The mean time to identification was 5 minutes (SD = 5; range, 1-20 minutes). Lesion location either very close to the CS (within the postcentral gyrus) or at an intermediate distance (with edema extending very close to the CS) independently decreased the rate at which the CS was identified by 73% (hazard ratio: 0.27, P < .001) and 55% (hazard ratio: 0.45, P = .007), respectively. Highly destructive pathology reduced this rate by 42% (hazard ratio: 0.58, P = .03), after adjusting for other important factors. Epidural recording, age, and the presence of a burst suppression pattern on the electroencephalogram had no effect.

CONCLUSION: MSSEP PRT is an effective method for CS identification and only marginally lengthens the operative time. However, difficulty in CS localization can be expected in the presence of postcentral gyrus lesions, edema distorting perirolandic anatomy, and with highly destructive pathology.

ABBREVIATIONS: CI, confidence interval

CS, central sulcus

ECoG, electrocorticogram

HR, hazard ratio

MSSEP, median somatosensory evoked potential

PRT, phase reversal technique

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.