You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

An Optimized System for Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Stereotactic Surgery: Preliminary Evaluation of Targeting Accuracy

Larson, Paul S. MD*; Starr, Philip A. MD, PhD*; Bates, Geoffrey BS; Tansey, Lisa BS; Richardson, R. Mark MD, PhD*; Martin, Alastair J. PhD§

Neurosurgery:
doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822f4a91
Technique Assessment: Editor's Choice
Editor's Choice
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation electrode placement with interventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has previously been reported using a commercially available skull-mounted aiming device (Medtronic Nexframe MR) and native MRI scanner software. This first-generation method has technical limitations that are inherent to the hardware and software used. A novel system (SurgiVision ClearPoint) consisting of an aiming device (SMARTFrame) and software has been developed specifically for interventional MRI, including deep brain stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To report a series of phantom and cadaver tests performed to determine the capability, preliminary accuracy, and workflow of the system.

METHODS: Eighteen experiments using a water phantom were used to determine the predictive accuracy of the software. Sixteen experiments using a gelatin-filled skull phantom were used to determine targeting accuracy of the aiming device. Six procedures in 3 cadaver heads were performed to compare the workflow and accuracy of ClearPoint with Nexframe MR.

RESULTS: Software prediction experiments showed an average error of 0.9 ± 0.5 mm in magnitude in pitch and roll (mean pitch error, −0.2 ± 0.7 mm; mean roll error, 0.2 ± 0.7 mm) and an average error of 0.7 ± 0.3 mm in X-Y translation with a slight anterior (0.5 ± 0.3 mm) and lateral (0.4 ± 0.3 mm) bias. Targeting accuracy experiments showed an average radial error of 0.5 ± 0.3 mm. Cadaver experiments showed a radial error of 0.2 ± 0.1 mm with the ClearPoint system (average procedure time, 88 ± 14 minutes) vs 0.6 ± 0.2 mm with the Nexframe MR (average procedure time, 92 ± 12 minutes).

CONCLUSION: This novel system provides the submillimetric accuracy required for stereotactic interventions, including deep brain stimulation placement. It also overcomes technical limitations inherent in the first-generation interventional MRI system.

Author Information

Departments of *Neurological Surgery

§Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California

MRI Interventions, Inc. (formerly SurgiVision, Inc.), Irvine, California

Correspondence: Paul S. Larson, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Box 0112, San Francisco, CA 94143-0112. E-mail: larsonp@neurosurg.ucsf.edu

Received June 12, 2010

Accepted May 17, 2011

Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons