Read the most current news on neurologic diseases here! And we want your input. Leave your comments at the end of each article.
Friday, September 19, 2014
by Rebecca Hiscott
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has called for sweeping changes to the way end-of-life care is administered, in a 507-page report published online Sept. 17 by The National Academies Press.
Image via Seattle Municipal Archives on Flickr.
Authored by the IOM’s 21-member Committee on Approaching Death: Addressing Key End of Life Issues, co-chaired by Philip A. Pizzo, MD, Susan Heckerman Professor of Pediatrics and Microbiology and Immunology and former dean of medicine at Stanford University, and David M. Walker, former US comptroller general, the report argued that current end-of-life care standards fail to meet the needs of patients with severe illnesses and those who may be approaching their final years of life, and do little to take into account patients’ values, goals, and preferences as they plan for their final days.
“Patients can, and should, take control of the quality of their life through their entire life, choosing how they live and how they die, and doctors should help initiate discussions with their patients about such decisions,” Dr. Pizzo said in a news release. “It is important that the health care options available to individuals facing the end of life help relieve pain and discomfort, maximize the individual’s ability to function, alleviate depression and anxiety, and ease the burdens of loved ones in a manner consistent with individual preferences and choices.”
Less than a quarter of Americans have given any thought to the kind of end-of-life care they would like to receive, and even fewer people have discussed their preferences with their physicians, family members, and caregivers. However, in cases where death can be anticipated, it is important for a patient to express their values and goals, and for health care providers to tailor end-of-life care to those values, the authors wrote. The issue is especially pressing now, as it is estimated that up to 20 percent of the US population will be over the age of 65 by 2050.
Across five overarching recommendations – some of which would require congressional action in order to be implemented – the authors advocated for more comprehensive standards governing discussions of end-of-life care.
“Care near the end of life should be person-centered, family-oriented, and evidence-based,” the authors wrote, adding that physicians should integrate high-quality conversations about planning for end-of-life care as part of their routine care of patients. These discussions could begin as early as when a person receives their driver’s license or goes to college, they recommended.
Medicare, as well as private insurers, should cover these end-of-life care conversations the same way they might cover a routine physician visit, they said.
In addition, the authors argued that too few doctors are trained in basic palliative care. They recommended improving training and certification for clinicians who care for seriously ill patients, with well-developed “standards for clinician-patient communication and advance care planning that are measurable, actionable, and evidence based.”
They also called for an end to “perverse financial incentives” that encourage hospitals and clinicians to order life-saving care for severely old and infirm patients, who often prefer less invasive palliative care.
“The U.S. health system is geared toward providing curative care aimed at curing disease, rather than providing the supportive and comfort care most people prefer at the end of life,” Walker said. “Without adequate advance care planning, the default decision is for clinicians to treat a disease or condition, no matter the prognosis. This is far from a patient-centered, family-oriented approach that honors the preferences for care for those near the end of life in an affordable and sustainable manner.”
In the long run, these reforms stand to lower national health care costs by reducing expensive and unwanted acute care services, such as 911 calls, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations for patients at the end of life, the authors wrote.
“The committee believes these savings would free up funding for relevant supporting services – for example, caregiver training, nutrition services, and home safety modifications – that would ensure a better quality of life for people near the end of life and protect and support their families,” they said.
The report was financed by an anonymous donor unknown to the committee, who had no control over who served on the panel.
Look for the full discussion of the report in an upcoming issue of Neurology Today. For more coverage of issues surrounding end-of-life care, browse our archives here: http://bit.ly/1p2z9NC.
Thursday, September 18, 2014
by Rebecca Hiscott
A study published in the Sept. 14 issue of Nature Neuroscience has found that cognitively normal adults with a buildup of beta-amyloid (Aβ) in the brain – a protein linked to Alzheimer’s disease and dementia – may have a neural compensation mechanism that allows them to retain normal brain function.
A scan that represents all subjects with beta-amyloid deposits in their brain; the yellow and orange colors show areas where greater brain activation was associated with the formation of more detailed memories. Image courtesy of Jagust Lab.
Researchers from the University of California, Berkeley evaluated the brains of 22 healthy young adults and 49 older adults who had normal cognition; 16 of the older adults were found to have beta-amyloid deposits, despite showing no signs of mental decline. The researchers then asked participants to memorize a series of photos and answer questions about the subject and details depicted in each image, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure brain activity.
The 16 study participants with beta-amyloid plaques were found to have increased brain activity in the parietal and occipital cortex, sections of the brain associated with visual processing and memory encoding. The results seem to confirm past research showing that cognitively normal older people with beta-amyloid deposits in the brain have increased neural activity when compared to younger people and those without Aβ plaques, the authors noted.
“The association between higher activity and more detailed memories suggests that Aβ-related hyperactivation is compensatory,” the study authors wrote.
“Generally, the groups performed equally well in the tasks, but it turned out that for people with beta-amyloid deposits in the brain, the more detailed and complex their memory, the more brain activity there was,” lead investigator William Jagust, MD, a professor of public health and neuroscience at UC Berkeley, said in a news release. “It seems their brain has found a way to compensate for the presence of the proteins associated with Alzheimer’s.
“This study provides evidence that there is plasticity or compensation ability in the aging brain that appears to be beneficial, even in the face of beta-amyloid accumulation,” he said.
Dr. Jagust added that past research has shown that adults who engage in mentally challenging activities throughout their lives may be better equipped to stave off cognitive decline, even in the presence of the hallmark plaques and tangles of Alzheimer’s disease. “I think it’s very possible that people who spend a lifetime involved in cognitively stimulating activity have brains that are better able to adapt to potential damage,” he said.
Future research will be needed to understand the mechanism by which some adults’ brains can compensate for the presence of beta-amyloid, the researchers wrote. It is also possible that these adults will still progress to dementia or Alzheimer’s disease later in life, “as neural inefficiency eventually increases to the point where compensation is no longer effective." This possibility will need to be investigated in long-term studies of behavior and neural function, they wrote.
For more coverage of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, browse our archives here: http://bit.ly/NN-AlzheimersDementia.
Monday, September 15, 2014
by Rebecca Hiscott
Dementia is widely recognized as one of the most common non-motor features of Parkinson’s disease (PD), occurring in as many as 50 percent of PD patients. But while past research has looked at motor features and disease subtype as predictors of Parkinson's disease dementia, fewer studies have investigated the link between non-motor symptoms and dementia in PD.
Now, a new prospective study published in the Aug. 29 online issue of Neurology has found that certain non-motor features of Parkinson’s disease, including orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure that occurs when standing up from sitting or lying down), REM sleep behavior disorder (unusual sleep behaviors, such as walking or talking while asleep), color discrimination ability, and gait dysfunction, could serve as predictors of dementia in PD patients.
Wandering and pacing are two very common behaviors in people with dementia.
“The most striking finding of our study is that the predictors of dementia are not necessarily what is already out there in the literature,” co-senior author Ronald Postuma, MD, MSc, professor of medicine in the department of neurology and neurosurgery at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, and researcher in neurosciences at the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center told Neurology Today.
“Typically, when we’ve looked at predictors of dementia there’s been a lot of emphasis on the motor phenotype—but in this case it really does appear that the strongest predictors of dementia...were non-motor,” he said.
The study screened 80 dementia-free Parkinson’s disease patients for a number of autonomic, sleep, psychiatric, visual, olfactory, and motor manifestations of the disease. The participants also underwent a neuropsychological examination at the beginning of the study that measured their executive function and attention, memory, and visuospatial ability. Patients were screened for dementia after 4.4 years of follow-up.
The authors reported that 27 of the 80 patients studied, or 34 percent, developed dementia at follow-up. Several variables were found to be strongly associated with PD dementia, most notably orthostatic blood pressure drop and REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD).
Patients who had RBD had a 43 percent risk of developing dementia, compared with 2.5 percent in those without RBD. In fact, only one of the 27 patients who developed dementia did not have RBD at the beginning of the study. In patients with orthostatic hypotension, having a systolic blood pressure drop of more than 10 mmHg increased dementia risk seven-fold.
The strength of the association between orthostatic hypotension and dementia risk surprised the researchers, Dr. Postuma said. “We do know that patients who have Parkinson’s disease and associated dementia are more likely to have orthostatic hypotension. I don’t think I would have been surprised to see a small effect, but such a large effect surprised me. It’s quite a striking relationship,” he said.
Other variables found to be associated with Parkinson's disease dementia included abnormal color vision, which tripled a patient’s odds of developing dementia, as well as mild cognitive impairment, and motor variables such as gait involvement, falls, and freezing. Older and male PD patients were more likely to develop dementia than younger and female patients.
While the study’s findings are prospective, they could be helpful in identifying Parkinson's disease patients who are at risk for developing dementia in the future, Dr. Postuma said. “We’re starting to get a sense of who is going to get dementia, and it’s not just related to age. Having more surveillance for dementia symptoms as they emerge, or being more aware of the likelihood of cognitive side-effects of certain medications if a patient has risk factors for dementia, could be a useful clinical point,” he said.
Look for the full story and discussion in the October 2 issue of Neurology Today. For past coverage of Parkinson’s disease dementia, browse our archives here: http://bit.ly/NN-PDdementia.
Friday, September 12, 2014
by Rebecca Hiscott
Most children are diagnosed with autism after the age of two, when symptoms tend to offer physicians a relatively reliable diagnosis. But in some infants, the signs of autism can be observed at as early as six months. For these children, early treatment could reduce autistic behaviors by age three, according to a new pilot study published in the September 2014 issue of the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
Researchers from the MIND Institute at the University of California, Davis, sought to determine whether infants diagnosed with autism at this early stage in development – based on autistic behaviors such as abnormal social-communicative interactions, unusual visual fixations, and decreased eye contact – would see long-term benefits from immediate intervention.
Image via Pink Sherbet Photography on Flickr.
Their pilot study identified seven infants between 7 and 15 months of age who were diagnosed with autism, culled from the MIND Institute’s Infant Sibling Study, which monitors the development of siblings of children with autism, and from the community. Professional therapists then trained the parents of these children in targeted parent-child interactions designed to improve communication, behavioral, and social skills over one-hour sessions for 12 weeks. The therapies focused on daily activities such as reading, play time, and feedings. The children also underwent developmental testing at intervals of three months until 36 months or three years of age.
The researchers found that the seven children who had undergone the therapeutic intervention showed fewer signs of autism than four autistic children who did not participate in the program. They also performed better than other children from the Infant Sibling Study who were diagnosed with autism at 36 months. By the end of the study, five of the seven children who participated in the treatment were not classified as having autism spectrum disorder or an intellectual disability.
“It gives us a little hint that the children may well have gone on to have more difficulties had we not done this intervention early,” lead author Sally J. Rogers, PhD, professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the MIND Institute School of Medicine, said in a recent interview. “But it’s only a hint, not proof.”
“Without a randomized trial, we do not know whether the course of these…infants would have been more like the [other autistic children studied] without intervention,” the authors wrote. “With only seven infants in the treatment group, no conclusions can be drawn.”
They also noted that later intervention is equally promising in children with autism. “There’s no reason to think that children would do better if they’re getting these interventions earlier,” said Dr. Rogers. “And in fact, most children haven’t shown their symptoms this early.”
For more coverage of autism research, browse our archives here: http://bit.ly/NN-Autism. Read Neurology Now’s June/July 2014 cover story on Alexis Wineman, the first Miss America contestant with autism spectrum disorder, here: http://bit.ly/AlexisWineman.
Thursday, September 11, 2014
by Richard Robinson
How many cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are there in the United States? In 2011, the answer was 12,187, according to the largest epidemiologic survey of ALS ever undertaken, which combined information from nationwide administrative databases with self-reporting through a novel web portal. The results were published in July in a supplementary edition of the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), or Lou Gehrig’s disease, affects the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord that control voluntary muscle movement. Pictured: ALS spinal cord showing upper motor neuron loss.
Combined into a single registry, the data provide a highly accurate snapshot of ALS in the United States. Whether the registry can also provide the raw material for fine-grained environmental risk analysis remains to be seen. But experts are hailing the registry as “a heroic undertaking” and “a terrific start.”
The challenge for understanding the epidemiology of ALS, according to lead study author Paul Mehta, MD, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is that there is no nationwide requirement for reporting ALS—it is a mandated reportable condition only in Massachusetts—and so comprehensive and standardized information is difficult to obtain. To overcome this obstacle, and in response to requests from ALS advocates, Congress passed the ALS Registry Act in 2008. The legislation directed the CDC to establish the National ALS Registry, which was implemented by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) beginning in 2009.
The registry drew the majority of its data from four nationwide administrative databases: Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans Health Administration, and the Veterans Benefits Administration. Cases of ALS were identified based on the appropriate ICD-9 code, plus some combination of a riluzole prescription, a death certificate listing ALS, or other confirmatory evidence.
The ATSDR also set up a web portal for self-registration of any ALS patient, and encouraged advocacy groups to get the word out about signing up online. The combination of the portal and administrative databases “was a novel approach,” Dr. Mehta said, but one that had been shown to be practical and accurate in several pilot studies preceding the nationwide effort. “It had never been done before, but we felt this was probably the best methodology.”
Inevitably, there was some overlap among the databases and between databases and the portal, and a great deal of effort went into removing duplicates. Of the 12,187 cases identified from October 2010 to December 2011, 70 percent were found only in the databases, 16 percent only in the portal data, and the remaining 14 percent in both. Those registering through the portal tended to be younger than those in the databases.
Despite the scale of the effort, Dr. Mehta said, “there is no way to capture every case.” Currently, there is also no way to independently determine the magnitude of the undercount, but the reported prevalence figure “is a baseline,” he said. The figure will be recalculated for 2012, “and it will probably inch up.”
Of the cases now in the registry, 61 percent are male and 79 percent are white. The age distribution matches what might be expected, with 15 percent of cases under age 50, and 50 percent of cases between the ages of 50 and 70. Based on the total number of cases, the overall prevalence for the US is 3.9 per 100,000 people.
The web portal also offers patients an opportunity to report on their residence, lifestyle factors, military service, and occupational and educational history, information which might prove useful in the search for environmental triggers for the disease. “As the registry matures, we will have more information on risk factors,” Dr. Mehta said, offering the potential for mining that data for clues to the etiology of ALS.
However, he noted, there are restrictions on the use of the data, stemming from the Federal Paperwork Reduction Act’s requirement that government agencies not place undue reporting burdens on citizens. The consequence is that diving deep into the data in ways that are not already approved will require permission from the Office of Management and Budget. “At this point, it would be hard to look for geographic clusters,” for example, without that permission, Dr. Mehta noted.
Research involving the portal enrollees is ongoing, however. When they sign up, patients can elect to receive requests from researchers for new studies. Researchers can then contact those patients – who remain anonymous unless they provide identifying information –to request they fill out surveys, for example, or enroll in a clinical trial. “There are quite a few researchers using the research notification tool,” said Dr. Mehta, adding that more than 13,000 emails have been sent out to enrollees to date.
Look for the full article and discussion in the September 18 issue of Neurology Today. For more coverage of the latest ALS research and treatments, browse our archive here: http://bit.ly/NN-ALS.