Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2013 - Volume 20 - Issue 1 > Oophorectomy: the debate between ovarian conservation and e...
doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31825a27ab
Personal Perspective

Oophorectomy: the debate between ovarian conservation and elective oophorectomy

Erekson, Elisabeth A. MD, MPH1; Martin, Deanna K. MPH1; Ratner, Elena S. MD2

Collapse Box


Abstract: Ovarian cancer remains the fifth deadliest cancer among women because of its early asymptomatic nature and lack of efficacious screening methods, leading to frequent late-stage diagnosis. Elective oophorectomy is an option for women undergoing benign hysterectomy as a means of reducing their ovarian cancer risk. Benefits also include reduced risk of repeat surgical operation due to adnexal masses and reduced anxiety related to perceived risk of ovarian and breast cancer. The potential negative side effects of elective oophorectomy, such as decreased cognition and sexual function and increased risk of osteoporosis and cardiac mortality, offer support for ovarian conservation. The implications of this elective procedure and the possible consequences without it require physicians to review the pros and cons with patients in light of the patient’s individual circumstances and ovarian cancer risk.

© 2013 by The North American Menopause Society.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.