Fetuses that fall below the normal percentiles for the given GAs have a risk of developing IUGR, and hence, defining appropriate normal percentile ranges is important. Racial variation in ultrasound fetal biometry measurements has been demonstrated previously. In this respect, several authors have emphasized the value of using customized fetal growth charts that take care of variables such as maternal weight, parity, race, etc. (Gardosi, 1994; Pang et al., 2003). There has been a growing interest in adjusting fetal size charts for genetic influence: this has resulted in a renewed body of publications regarding race-adjusted and/or customized fetal size charts (Bernstein et al., 1996; Jacquemyn et al., 2000; Chung et al., 2003). Papaioannou et al. (2010) constructed normal ranges for embryonic crown-rump length (CRL), heart rate (HR), gestational sac diameter (GSD), and yolk sac diameter (YSD) at 6–10 weeks of gestation. The study reported significant quadratic associations between CRL, GSD, YSD, and gestation, and between HR, GSD, YSD, and CRL, and a cubic association between HR and gestation.
In the present study, fetal biometry of the local population was compared with some of the widely used populations and an Arabian population. We compared our pilot biometric measurements with those published from British (Altman and Chitty, 1997; Loughna et al., 2009), French (Salomon et al., 2006), Italian (Paladini et al., 2005), and Saudi Arabian (Nasrat and Bondagji, 2005) populations. A comparison of our data with those of UK (Altman and Chitty, 1997) and Italian (Paladini et al., 2005) data was carried out. The results of analysis of variance (Kruskal–Wallis test) between the measurements of the BPD, HC, AC, and FL of the present study and other western studies at the median and the 5th and 95th percentiles were statistically significant (P<0.0001) at all points of GAs, indicating that data are obtained from statistically different populations.
Marked variations between different populations in fetal measurements were observed, particularly at the extremes of ranges of fetal measurements, 5th and/or 95th percentiles. The consistency of such variations between different studies cannot be attributed to technical variables alone. Racial variation in newborn birth weight is well recognized and bound to be associated with similar variations in intrauterine fetal morphometric measurements. A comparison of our pilot data with those of Italian and UK populations at the 50th centiles are shown in Figs 1 and 2, respectively, for HC and FL. A marked difference was observed in the FL measurements as compared with both Italian and British populations. However, our data were closer to the Italian data, especially for HC. In addition, we compared our data with those of Johnsen et al. (2006) in Norway, which included 650 low-risk pregnancies, with the GA ranging from 10 to 40 weeks. A comparison showed BPD values lower than those of Johnsen et al. (2006) between the 20th and the 23rd weeks, higher values for HC from the beginning of the 14th week, which decreased gradually with progression of GA till the 22nd week, higher values for AC from the beginning of the 14th week and a gradual decrease with progression of GA till the 19th week, and higher FL values from the beginning of the 14th week till the 24th week at a constant difference of 1 week. These differences may be attributed to the difference in methodology, racial variation, or both; moreover, pregnancies with maternal or fetal complications were not withdrawn in the study of Johnsen et al. (2006).
The variation in fetal FL with respect to maternal race using fetuses of 39 Asian mothers, 31 black mothers, and 100 white mothers was reported previously. The fetal FL varies according to race; African American fetuses had longer-than expected FLs, and Asian fetuses had shorter-than-expected FLs compared with white fetuses (Shipp et al., 2001). The impact of race and ethnicity on the expected HL by BPD measurement in second-trimester fetuses was studied by Zelop et al. (2003). Ultrasound, obstetric, and cytogenetic databases from 1995 through 2001 for all normal fetuses between 15 and 22 weeks’ gestation were studied. The 11 278 fetuses including 4202 African American, 2269 Hispanic, 639 Asian, and 4168 white fetuses. The study concluded that race and ethnicity do not appear to affect the mean regression line of the expected HL by BPD among fetuses in the second trimester. In contrast, in a study conducted in Belgium (Jacquemyn et al., 2000) on 524 fetuses, 369 (70.4%) Belgian, 77 (14.7%) Moroccan, and 78 (14.9%) Turkish, it was found that fetuses of Turkish and Moroccan women had a shorter FL, AC, and HC than those of Belgian women. In a previous longitudinal study on fetal growth in Saudi Arabia, it was shown that there was a significant change in the rate of growth of fetal BPD from a mean increment rate of about 8% per week at 18 weeks to 3.9 and 1.3% increments per week at 28 and 38 weeks, respectively (Nasrat, 1997). FL measurements have the same utilization as for head measurements in the first half of gestation. Therefore, it might be important to pay more attention to ethnic variation in the fetal FL. In the third trimester, FL measurements are often included, together with AC measurements, in the equation for the estimation of the GA.
Racial variation in newborn birth weight is well recognized and bound to be associated with similar variations in intrauterine fetal morphometric measurements. In practice, it seems that variations in fetal biometry are an inevitable finding. The important point, however, pertains to the clinical significance of such variations. A short femur has been reported as one of the soft markers associated with Down syndrome. Hence, it might be important to pay more attention to ethnic variation in the fetal FL. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the importance of using specific population-based parameters for other disorders such as skeletal dysphasias. In the third trimester, FL measurements are often included, together with AC measurements, in the equation for the estimation of GA. Therefore, using cut-off points, for example, 10th or 5th percentile, based on AC charts driven from different populations would potentially increase the risk of either overdiagnosis or underdiagnosis of IUGR fetuses and vice versa. The consistency of such variations between different studies cannot be attributed to technical variables alone.
In conclusion, we have constructed a new set of pilot data for fetal biometric measurements for Egyptian singleton pregnancies. Our data were not similar to those of other populations. The main difference between our fetal biometric results and those of the UK and the French populations was in the FL measurements. The study emphasizes that genetic, environmental, and intergenerational effects are important factors that may play significant roles in the racial difference of fetal biometry. Therefore, the study recommends the development of national fetal biometric charts that can be used for the assessment of fetal growth and in clinical practice.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Altman DG, Chitty LS. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10:174–191
Bernstein IM, Mohs G, Rucquoi M, Badger GJ. Case for hybrid “fetal growth curves”: a population-based estimation of normal fetal size across gestational age. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996;5:124–127
Chitty LS, Altman DG, Henderson A, Campbell S. Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length. BJOG. 1994;101:132–135
Chung JH, Boscardin WJ, Garite TJ, Lagrew DC, Porto M. Ethnic differences in birth weight by gestational age: at least a partial explanation for the Hispanic epidemiologic paradox? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1058–1062
Gardosi J. Customized fetal growth charts. BMUS Bulletin. 1994;2:20–24
Jacquemyn Y, Sys SU, Verdonk P. Fetal biometry in different ethnic groups. Early Hum Dev. 2000;57:1–13
Johnsen SL, Wilsgaard T, Rasmussen S, Sollien R, Kiserud T. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;127:172–185
Kurmanavicius J, Wright EM, Royston P, Zimmermann R, Huch R, Huch A, et al. Fetal ultrasound biometry: 2. Abdomen and femur length reference values. BJOG. 1999;106:136–143
Loughna P, Chitty L, Evans T, Chudleigh T. Fetal size and dating: charts recommended for clinical obstetric practice. Ultrasound. 2009;17:161–167
Nasrat H, Bondagji NS. Ultrasound biometry of Arabian fetuses. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;88:173–178
Nasrat HA. Use of ultrasound longitudinal data in the diagnosis of abnormal fetal growth. J Matern Fetal Med. 1997;6:209–214
Paladini D, Rustico M, Viora E, Giani U, Bruzzese D, Campogrande M, et al. Fetal size charts for the Italian population. Normative curves of head, abdomen and long bones. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25:456–464
Pang MW, Leung TN, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Chang AM. Customizing fetal biometric charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:271–276
Papaioannou GI, Syngelaki A, Poon LC, Ross JA, Nicolaides KH. Normal ranges of embryonic length, embryonic heart rate, gestational sac diameter and yolk sac diameter at 6–10 weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;28:207–219
Salomon LJ, Duyme M, Crequat J, Brodaty G, Talmant C, Fries N, et al. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:193–198
Shipp TD, Bromley B, Mascola M, Benacerraf B. Variation in fetal femur length with respect to maternal race. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:141–144
Yeo GS, Chan WB, Lun KC, Lai FM. Racial differences in fetal morphometry in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23:371–376
Zelop CM, Borgida AF, Egan JF. Variation of fetal humeral length in second-trimester fetuses according to race and ethnicity. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22:691–693
Keywords:© 2012 Middle East Journal of Medical Genetics
fetal biometry; population; reference data; ultrasound