Disorders of sex development: new genetic factors and impact of medical genomics

Bashamboo, Anu; McElreavey, Ken

Middle East Journal of Medical Genetics:
doi: 10.1097/01.MXE.0000407742.94579.b1
Review articles

Patients and methods: Disorders of sex development (DSD) are congenital conditions in which the development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical and covers a wide spectrum of human urogenital anomalies including gonadal dysgenesis, ambiguous genitalia, or testis development in an XX individual.

Results: Although there have been major advances in our understanding of the genetic pathway of human gonadal development, progress in the identification of the underlying genetic basis of DSD has been slow. It has been estimated that a molecular diagnosis is made in only around 20% of DSD, except in cases where the biochemical profile indicates a specific steroidogenic block.

Conclusions: This review examines recent advances in identifying genetic cause of DSD with an emphasis on the NR5A1 and GATA4 genes. We also discuss new sequencing approaches and their likely impact on the genetic analyses of DSD.

Author Information

Human Development Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

Correspondence to Anu Bashamboo, Human Developmental Genetics Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75724, France Tel: +00 33 1 4568 8920; fax: +00 33 1 4568 8639;e-mail: anu.bashamboo@pasteur.fr

Received January 21, 2011

Accepted February 20, 2011

Article Outline
Back to Top | Article Outline


Disorder of sex development (DSD) is defined as ‘congenital conditions in which the development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical’ (Hughes et al., 2006). DSD therefore covers a very wide spectrum of human phenotypes, and it is divided into a series of subgroups. 46, XY DSD includes 46, XY complete or partial gonadal dysgenesis, or undervirilisation or undermasculinization of an XY male, due to defects in androgen synthesis or action. 46, XX DSD includes gonadal dysgenesis, or more commonly overvirilisation or masculinization of an XX female, due to androgen excess. Ovotesticular DSD refers to an individual with both ovarian and testicular material present in the same or different gonads, and 46, XX testicular DSD refers to an XX male with testes. Other forms of DSD include cloacal exstrophy, severe hypospadias, vaginal atresia, and as part of other conditions such as the Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome, the Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome, or the genito–palato–cardiac syndrome (Porter, 2008; Sultan et al., 2009; Greenberg et al., 1987).

There has been a considerable advance in our understanding of the genetic factors involved in gonadal differentiation in the last 20 years since the SRY gene was first identified as the mammalian testis-determining gene (Fig. 1). However, the identification of new genetic causes of human DSD has not improved substantially in recent years. It has been estimated that a molecular diagnosis is made in only around 20% of DSD, except in cases where the biochemical profile indicates a specific steroidogenic block (Hughes et al., 2006). There is clearly an urgent need to identify new genetic factors involved in DSD. This would not only deepen our knowledge on the etiopathology of these conditions, but it will also lead to accurate and comprehensive molecular diagnosis of hitherto untreatable conditions that are difficult to diagnose.

Disorders of sex development also represent a major burden on public health services. They represent a group of both common (hypospadias) and rare (gonadal dysgenesis) disorders, and in many cases, they require costly and long-term surgical treatment options. For the patients and families with DSD, there are additional concerns. A failure to understand the genetic cause or to offer a correct diagnosis can lead to premature and inappropriate clinical decisions that can lead to irreversible surgical interventions. Sex identity can also be a major concern for patients and families. This review will focus on recent genetic advances in one subset of DSD. These are the pathologies that are due to errors in human sex determination, the choice between the gonad developing as a testis or an ovary, that is, 46, XY complete or partial gonadal dysgenesis and 46, XX testicular or ovotesticular DSD.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Genetic model of human gonad development

Our current knowledge of the genes involved in gonadal development has come mainly from rodent studies and the molecular analysis of human cases of DSD. These have shown that several genes, including Lhx9, NR5A1, Wt1, GATA4, and Fog2 are required for the development of the early genital ridge in the mouse (Fig. 1; Sekido and Lovell-Badge, 2009). Absence of these genes leads to a failure of gonadal development in both female and male embryos. Rodent studies indicate that in the male, SRY acts during a restricted window of time during embryonal development to activate the downstream effector Sox9 (Sekido and Lovell-Badge, 2008). Sertoli cells are one of the first somatic cell lineages to differentiate during testis formation and produce anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH). SRY expression ensures the differentiation of sufficient Sertoli cells to initiate testicular development by positively regulating Sox9 expression. Once formed, the Sertoli cells coordinate the cellular and morphogenetic events leading to sex determination. This includes the development of Leydig cells, which synthesize and produce the male hormone testosterone, and which differentiate after the appearance of Sertoli cells (Sekido and Lovell-Badge, 2008, 2009). In contrast, ovarian somatic sex determination appears to be relatively labile, with a potential to switch to a testis state. Complete or partial XX male sex-reversal is observed in humans and mice with loss-of-function mutations of the genes WNT4, RSPO1, and Foxl2 (Sekido and Lovell-Badge, 2009). In XX Wnt4−/− mutant embryos, the gonads are partially masculinized, with transient expression of male-specific genes (Sox9) and the presence of Leydig-like cells producing testosterone, and a testis-specific vasculature (Vainio et al., 1999). RSPO1 mutations give an almost identical gonadal phenotype (Tomizuka et al., 2008). In the presence of Wnt, RSPO1 binds to LRP6, a coreceptor of the Wnt receptor frizzled, to stabilize β-catenin. RSPO1 therefore amplifies Wnt signaling, indicating that β-catenin may repress the testis pathway (Fig. 1; Schlessinger et al., 2010). SRY may inhibit β-catenin and promote Sox9 transcription. In mice lacking Foxl2, the expression of several early testis-determining genes including Sox9 are dysregulated, suggesting that it acts as an antitestis gene (Schlessinger et al., 2010). In murine XY ovotestes, the somatic cells express either Sox9 or Foxl2 but never both in the same cell, suggesting that Sox9 suppresses the ovarian pathway in Sertoli cell precursors (Uhlenhaut et al., 2009; Wilhelm et al., 2009). Mammalian sex-determination may therefore involve a battle of the sexes with antagonism between the male-promoting Sox9 pathway and the female-promoting (or male-supressing) Wnt4/Foxl2 pathway(s) in the somatic cell lineage (Fig. 1).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Recent advances in our understanding of the genetic causes of 46, XY gonadal dysgenesis

Complete 46, XY gonadal dysgenesis is characterized by the absence of testicular tissue in gonads, which consists of a streak of fibrous tissue. The phenotype is female, with normal appearance of the external genitalia. These individuals are candidates for carrying mutations in genes involved in the early events of gonadal sex determination. Partial 46, XY gonadal dysgenesis is characterized by the presence of some testicular tissue in the gonads. The external genitalia may be partially masculinized depending on the quantity of testicular material present in the gonads. Although these individuals form distinct clinical groups, we argue that some cases of 46, XY ambiguous external genitalia and infertile male with apparently normal testis may be part of the clinical spectrum of gonadal dysgenesis. The reason for this is two-fold: (a) several pedigrees have been described where the phenotype ranges from 46, XY complete gonadal dysgenesis to simple hypospadias. In some pedigrees, the causative genetic mutation is known and the variation in the severity of the phenotype may be due to other genetic modifiers (Jawaheer et al., 2003; Dumic et al., 2008). (b) Mutations in the same gene, or occasionally the same amino acid change, can be associated with each of the following: 46, XY complete or partial gonadal dysgenesis, 46, XY male with hypospadias, and 46, XY infertile male.

Back to Top | Article Outline

NR5A1, a key player in human gonad development

The gene NR5A1, which encodes steroidogenic factor-1, is a pivotal transcriptional regulator of genes involved in the hypothalamic–pituitary–steroidogenic axis (Morohashi et al., 1992; Luo et al., 1994). During early male development, NR5A1 positively regulates the expression of two key genes involved in male sex determination and differentiation: SOX9 (Sry-box 9) and AMH (De Santa Barbara et al., 1998; Sekido and Lovell-Badge, 2008). NR5A1 also modulates the expression of many factors involved in cholesterol mobilization and steroid hormone biosynthesis, including HMG-CoA synthase, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, and several cytochrome P450 steroid hydroxylase enzymes (Lin and Achermann, 2008). The NR5A1 protein consists of a DNA-binding domain of two zinc fingers (ZFs), a hinge region, a ligand-binding domain, and two activation function domains (Hoivik et al., 2010). NR5A1 is expressed in the Sertoli and Leydig cells of the developing testis and in Sertoli cells of the prepubertal and adult testis (Morohashi et al., 1994; Hanley et al., 1999). Mice lacking NR5A1 exhibit both gonadal and adrenal agenesis (Luo et al., 1994). Human NR5A1 mutations were first reported in association with 46, XY DSD and adrenal insufficiency, and in a 46, XX girl with adrenal insufficiency (Lin and Achermann, 2008). More recently, the range of phenotypes that are associated with NR5A1 mutations has broadened and includes 46, XY complete and partial gonadal dysgenesis, penoscrotal hypospadias, micropenis with anorchidia, and 46, XX primary ovarian insufficiency (Lin and Achermann, 2008; Köhler et al., 2009; Lourenço et al., 2009).

In a mouse NR5A1 Leydig cell-specific knockout, mice had hypoplastic testes where the lumens of the seminiferous tubules failed to open and spermatogonia never developed into mature sperm (Jeyasuria et al., 2004). These mice also showed reduced expression of two key genes in testosterone biosynthesis: cytochrome P450 steroid hydroxylase 11a and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (Jeyasuria et al., 2004). We decided to investigate whether NR5A1 mutations could also be associated with some cases of male infertility. Infertility is a major public health burden, with one in seven couples worldwide having problems conceiving (Skakkebaek et al., 2006). In recent years, there has been increasing concern about a possible decline in the reproductive health, and this trend is paralleled by an increasing demand for infertility treatments. In the majority of the cases, the underlying cause of male infertility is unknown although familial clustering of male subfertility and families with multiple infertile or subfertile men, where an autosomal recessive or dominant mutation with sex-limited expression is likely to be present, indicates a substantial genetic contribution (Gianotten et al., 2004). In a mutation screen, we identified mutations in NR5A1 coding sequences in 4% of men with severe spermatogenic failure (azoospermia or severe oligospermia) in otherwise healthy men with normal external genitalia (Bashamboo et al., 2010). In these cases, other known causes of infertility were excluded. This observation is important for several reasons: (a) the data therefore support the hypothesis of Skakkebaek et al. (2006) that a subset of men with spermatogenic failure have a mild form of gonadal dysgenesis (Wohlfahrt-Veje et al., 2009). The gonadal histology in one of our reported case supports this hypothesis (Bashamboo et al., 2010). (b) Our data suggest that this subset of men with severe spermatogenic may also be at risk of endocrine dysfunction and failing testosterone with increasing age. This highlights a need for careful clinical investigation of men presenting with infertility and incongruous testosterone and gonadotropin levels. (c) We demonstrate that approximately 4% of men with otherwise unexplained severe spermatogenic failure carry mutations in the NR5A1 gene, which makes this the most common single gene defect associated with nonobstructive infertility (Bashamboo et al., 2010 and unpublished observations). The data also suggest that some forms of male infertility may be an indicator of mild testicular dysgenesis.

Our data on the role of NR5A1 in a range of gonadal anomalies is particularly informative. We see that the range of phenotypes is large. In the familial cases, we observe normal, apparently healthy men and women carrying mutations that are pathogenic in other individuals (Lourenço et al., 2009). The pathogenic phenotypes range in an XY individual from infertile men with normal appearance of the external genitalia to XY complete gonadal dysgenesis with female external genitalia. In an XX individual, we observed primary amenorrhea and premature ovarian failure. In several patients, the same amino acid change is associated with different phenotypes in different individuals (Lourenço et al., 2009; Bashamboo et al., 2010; unpublished data). This obviously presents a serious challenge in genetic counseling, and it is not yet possible to predict genotype/phenotype correlations. This also highlights the importance of establishing the complete family history in each case of DSD. Other family members with infertility (but apparently normal development of the gonad and external genitalia) may be a sign of a familial case of DSD that warrants further investigation.

Back to Top | Article Outline


GATA4 belongs to the evolutionarily conserved Gata family of sex tissue and organ-specific vertebrate transcriptional regulators, consisting of two ZFs (Patient and McGhee, 2002). The C-terminal ZF is required for recognition and DNA binding, whereas the N-terminal ZF contributes to the stability of this binding.

ZFs are also crucial for protein–protein interactions with other transcription cofactors. In humans, GATA4 is strongly expressed in the somatic cell population of the developing gonad before and during the time of sex determination (Viger et al., 1998). GATA4 cooperatively interacts with several proteins to regulate the expression of the sex-determining genes Sry, Sox9 and Amh, and key steroidogenic factors (Miyamoto et al., 2008; Nishida et al., 2008; Viger et al., 2008). Mice lacking GATA4 die in utero because of profound abnormalities in ventral morphogenesis and heart tube formation (Kuo et al., 1997; Molkentin et al., 1997). In humans, mutations in GATA4 are associated with congenital heart defects (CHD), including atrial septal defects, ventricular septal defects, pulmonary valve thickening, or insufficiency of the cardiac valves (Garg et al., 2003; Hirayama-Yamada et al., 2005; Nemer et al., 2006; Tomita-Mitchell et al., 2007). In all of the cases of CHD associated with mutations in GATA4, other organs were reported as normal.

The critical role of GATA4 in gonadal development is highlighted by Gata4ki mice that have a p.Val217Gly mutation in the N-terminal ZF domain (Bouma et al., 2007). This knock-in mutation abrogates the interaction of GATA4 with the cofactor Fog2, and these animals display severe anomalies in testis development (Crispino et al., 2001; Tevosian et al., 2002). Fog2 may act as a transcriptional repressor or activator, depending on the cellular and promoter context. Mice lacking Fog2 exhibit a block in gonadogenesis, and a translocation involving Fog2 in humans is reported to be associated with male hypergonadotropic hypogonadism (Crispino et al., 2001; Tevosian et al., 2002; Finelli et al., 2007). In vitro, Fog2 represses Gata4-dependent transcription of AMH in primary Sertoli cell cultures (Tremblay et al., 2001). Although the mechanism of Fog2 and GATA4 interaction in the gonad is not well defined, it is essential that a direct physical interaction between GATA4 and Fog2 be maintained, as abrogation of the same results in abnormal testis development in mice (Crispino et al., 2001; Tevosian et al., 2002). We identified a missense mutation in the GATA4 gene (p.Gly221Arg) associated with a familial case of 46, XY DSD and CHD (Fig. 2; Lourenço et al., 2011). The mutation showed altered biological activity. It compromised the ability of the protein to bind to and transactivate the AMH promoter. The mutation did not interfere with the direct protein–protein interaction, but it disrupted synergistic activation of the AMH promoter by GATA4 and NR5A1. The p.Gly221Arg mutant protein also failed to bind to Fog2. Our data demonstrate the key role of GATA4 in human testicular development. This familial case shows that GATA4 mutations may be associated with both syndromic and nonsyndromic forms of 46, XY DSD and that the same GATA4 amino acid change may be associated with more or less severe gonadal phenotypes, suggesting a role of genetic modifiers. However, the overall incidence of GATA4 mutations in 46, XY DSD remains to be determined.

Back to Top | Article Outline


In mammalian cells, a variety of extracellular stimuli generate intracellular signals that activate the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade (Robinson and Cobb, 1997). Recently, XY sex reversal was described in association with a murine Map3k4 mutation, suggesting a conserved MAP kinase pathway for testis formation (Bogani et al., 2009). Several proteins involved in human sex development, including SRY, are known to be phosphorylated by an mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent pathway, and in the case of NR5A1 and GATA4, phosphorylation increases their transcriptional activation potential (Desclozeaux et al., 1998; Charron et al., 2001; Desclozeaux et al., 2002). We previously reported a large familial case of 46, XY DSD (Jawaheer et al., 2003). The phenotype in this family shows an autosomal-dominant mode of inheritance, and linkage analysis indicated that the mutation responsible for the phenotype is located in the proximal chromosome 5q (Jawaheer et al., 2003). Further analyses revealed that this family carried a splice donor site mutation in MAP3K1, and that other, unrelated cases of 46, XY DSD, one familial and two sporadic, also carried mutations in the gene (Pearlman et al., 2010). Remarkably, for a gene product with multiple functions, the affected XY individuals had no other obvious phenotype and female carriers were normal. The incidence of MAP3K1 mutations in DSD was estimated to be around 18%.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Genetic causes of 46, XX testicular or ovotesticular disorder of sex development

Approximately 80% of XX testicular DSD (formerly termed XX male) and 10% of ovotesticular DSD (formerly XX true hermaphrodite) carry the SRY gene in their genome, usually present on the X chromosome (McElreavey et al., 1992; McElreavey and Cortes, 2001). The presence of SRY is sufficient in these cases to result in the testicular tissue being present in the gonads (McElreavey and Cortes, 2001). Considerable research attention is currently focused on understanding the genetic causes of SRY-negative cases. Loss-of-function mutations have been described in RSPO1 and WNT4 associated with syndromic forms of these phenotypes (RSPO1, XX male, palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, and predisposition to squamous cell carcinoma of the skin; Parma et al., 2006; WNT4, SERKAL syndrome, Mandel et al., 2008). In the nonsyndromic forms, the genetic cause is unclear. Rearrangements involving either a duplication of Sox9 or deletions in the regulatory elements of the related SOX9 gene have been described (Cox et al., 2011; Sutton et al., 2011), but to date, mutations involving coding sequences of a gene have not been reported. A number of familial cases of XX testicular or ovotesticular DSD have been reported from the Middle East, and these represent an important resource for mutation identification in the future (Jarrah et al., 2000).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Impact of medical genomics

In our experience, we find pathogenic mutations in approximately 20% of cases of 46, XY DSD by screening a relatively limited number of candidate genes. In the case of Sry negative XX DSD, the incidence of disease-causing mutations is much less. The identification of genes involved in these pathologies has been difficult to achieve by classical approaches in human genetics. As a key developmental process, it is surprising that the genetic factors involved in sex determination are not well conserved in evolution. The study of sex development in model organisms such as Drosophila or Caenorhabditis elegans has, for the most part, not provided major insights into mammalian sex-determination. Sex-determination is not well conserved even in vertebrates. Sequencing of candidate genes has also not been as fruitful as one would have anticipated. The other classical approach is to use familial cases to map the mutation. Familial cases of gonadal dysgenesis or XX testicular DSD are not widely reported in the literature, although in our experience, many sporadic cases may in fact be unrecognized familial forms of DSD. These difficulties can be overcome using next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches. The advent of NGS technologies has tremendously reduced the sequencing cost and the experimental complexity involved in large-scale sequencing experiments. NGS technologies now offer excellent template coverage, rendering sequencing-based genome analysis more readily available and useful to individual, small laboratories. These sequencing methods use massively parallel approaches to sequence several hundred thousand to millions of reads simultaneously (Ansorge, 2009; Metzker, 2010). For a review of the technologies and strategies used, see Bashamboo et al. (2010).

NGS technologies offer substantial cost reductions when compared with the Sanger method, but sequencing the whole human genome remains expensive for most laboratories, and the data analyses involved can be challenging. An alternative approach involves targeting specific regions of the genome that are enriched for NGS sequencing: for example, sequencing all of the exons in the genome; sequencing specific gene families of interest; or focusing just on large chromosome regions or entire chromosomes that are implicated in disease. Recently, whole-exome sequencing has become a highly efficient and cost-effective strategy to selectively sequence the coding regions of the human genome to identify novel genes associated with rare and common Mendelian disorders. The goal of this approach is to identify the functional variant that is responsible for the disease without the high costs associated with either whole-genome sequencing or time-consuming sequencing of many potential candidate genes. It is estimated that the protein-coding regions of the human genome constitute about 85% of the disease-causing mutations. With this in mind, exome sequencing has becoming the method of choice in medical genetics for identifying pathogenic mutations in medical genetics with no prior knowledge of the genes involved (Bilgüvar et al., 2010; Johnson et al., 2010; Krawitz et al., 2010; Otto et al., 2010; Pierce et al., 2010; Caliskan et al., 2011; Kalay et al., 2011). Exome capture approaches are available for targeting approximately 50 Mb or ∼180 000 coding exons across the human genome. Many platforms also offer the capture of miRNAs and noncoding RNA sequences. Selective genomic enrichment of the human exome offers an attractive option for devising new experimental designs aimed at quick identification of potential disease-associated genetic variants. Human exome capture methods are currently based on either custom-designed oligonucleotide microarrays or solution-based hybridization strategies. In addition to generating vast amounts of sequence information, the recent NGS applications not only have the ability to generate huge amounts of sequence data but they also reveal structural variation, thereby bypassing the need for CGH analyses (McKernan et al., 2009).

NGS approaches will have a major impact on the understanding and diagnosis of DSD. However, even in 46, XY underandrogenized individuals with a testis, who are suspected to have an androgen receptor defect, a pathogenic mutation is found only in less than half of the cases (Audi et al., 2010). In cases of simple hypospadias or cryptorchidism, a genetic cause is rarely detected despite epidemiological evidence, suggesting a major genetic contribution to these phenotypes (Fukami et al., 2006; Köhler et al., 2009).

Large-scale genomic sequencing approaches also offer the opportunity to identify genetic factors that influence the severity or penetrance of the phenotype. Familial cases of both 46, XY and 46, XX DSD often show considerable variation in the expression of the phenotype, including families where the underlying genetic cause has been identified (Temel et al., 2007; Lourenço et al., 2009). In a pedigree with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, a compound heterozygous GNRHR and a heterozygous FGFR1 mutation were identified (Pitteloud et al., 2007).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Ansorge WJ. Next-generation DNA sequencing techniques. N Biotechnol. 2009;25:195–203
Audi L, Fernández-Cancio M, Carrascosa A, Andaluz P, Torán N, Piró C, et al. Novel (60%) and recurrent (40%) androgen receptor gene mutations in a series of 59 patients with a 46,XY disorder of sex development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:1876–1888
Bashamboo A, Ledig S, Wieacker P, Achermann J, McElreavey K. New technologies for the identification of novel genetic markers of disorders of sex development (DSD). Sex Dev. 2010;4:213–224
Bilgüvar K, Oztürk AK, Louvi A, Kwan KY, Choi M, Tatli B, et al. Whole-exome sequencing identifies recessive WDR62 mutations in severe brain malformations. Nature. 2010;467:207–210
Bogani D, Siggers P, Brixey R, Warr N, Beddow S, Edwards J, et al. Loss of mitogen-activated protein kinase 4 (MAP3K4) reveals a requirement for MAPK signalling in mouse sex determination. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000196
Bouma GJ, Washburn LL, Albrecht KH, Eicher EM. Correct dosage of Fog2 and Gata4 transcription factors is critical for fetal testis development in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:14994–14999
Caliskan M, Chong JX, Uricchio L, Anderson R, Chen P, Sougnez C, et al. Exome sequencing reveals a novel mutation for autosomal recessive non-syndromic mental retardation in the TECR gene on chromosome 19p13. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:1285–1289
Charron F, Tsimiklis G, Arcand M, Robitaille L, Liang Q, Molkentin JD, et al. Tissue specific GATA factors are transcriptional effectors of the small GTPase RhoA. Genes Dev. 2001;15:2702–2719
Cox JJ, Willatt L, Homfray T, Woods CG. A SOX9 duplication and familial 46, XX developmental testicular disorder. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:91–93
Crispino JD, Lodish MB, Thurberg BL, Litovsky SH, Collins T, Molkentin JD, et al. Proper coronary vascular development and heart morphogenesis depend on interaction of GATA-4 with FOG cofactors. Genes Dev. 2001;15:839–844
De Santa Barbara P, Bonneaud N, Desclozeaux M, Moniot B, Sudbeck P, Scherer G, et al. Direct interaction of SRY-related protein SOX9 and steroidogenic factor 1 regulates transcription of the human anti-Müllerian hormone gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:6653–6665
Desclozeaux M, Poulat F, de Santa Barbara P, Capony JP, Turowski P, Jay P, et al. Phosphorylation of an N-terminal motif enhances DNA-binding activity of the human SRY protein. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:7988–7995
Desclozeaux M, Krylova IN, Horn F, Fletterick RJ, Ingraham HA. Phosphorylation and intramolecular stabilization of the ligand binding domain in the nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:7193–7203
Dumic M, Lin-Su K, Leibel NI, Ciglar S, Vinci G, Lasan R, et al. Report of fertility in a woman with a predominantly 46, XY karyotype in a family with multiple disorders of sexual development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:182–189
Finelli P, Pincelli AI, Russo S, Bonati MT, Recalcati MP, Masciadri M, et al. Disruption of friend of GATA 2 gene (FOG-2) by a de novo t(8;10) chromosomal translocation is associated with heart defects and gonadal dysgenesis. Clin Genet. 2007;71:195–204
Fukami M, Wada Y, Miyabayashi K, Nishino I, Hasegawa T, Nordenskjöld A, et al. CXorf6 is a causative gene for hypospadias. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1369–1371
Garg V, Kathiriya IS, Barnes R, Schluterman MK, King IN, Butler CA, et al. GATA4 mutations cause human congenital heart defects and reveal an interaction with TBX5. Nature. 2003;424:443–447
Gianotten J, Westerveld GH, Leschot NJ, Tanck MW, Lilford RJ, Lombardi MP, et al. Familial clustering of impaired spermatogenesis: no evidence for a common genetic inheritance pattern. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:71–76
Greenberg F, Gresik MV, Carpenter RJ, Law SW, Hoffman LP, Ledbetter DH. The Gardner–Silengo–Wachtel or genito–palato–cardiac syndrome: male pseudohermaphroditism with micrognathia, cleft palate, and conotruncal cardiac defect. Am J Med Genet. 1987;26:59–64
Hanley NA, Ball SG, Clement-Jones M, Hagan DM, Strachan T, Lindsay S, et al. Expression of steroidogenic factor 1 and Wilms’ tumour 1 during early human gonadal development and sex determination. Mech Dev. 1999;87:175–180
Hirayama-Yamada K, Kamisago M, Akimoto K, Aotsuka H, Nakamura Y, Tomita H, et al. Phenotypes with GATA4 or NKX2.5 mutations in familial atrial septal defect. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;135:47–52
Hoivik EA, Lewis AE, Aumo L, Bakke M. Molecular aspects of steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1). Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;315:27–39
Hughes IA, Houk C, Ahmed SF, Lee PA. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91:554–563
Jarrah N, El-Shanti H, Khier A, Obeidat FN, Haddidi A, Ajlouni K. Familial disorder of sex determination in seven individuals from three related sibships. Eur J Pediatr. 2000;159:912–918
Jawaheer D, Juo SH, Le Caignec C, David A, Petit C, Gregersen P, et al. Mapping a gene for 46, XY gonadal dysgenesis by linkage analysis. Clin Genet. 2003;63:530–535
Jeyasuria P, Ikeda Y, Jamin SP, Zhao L, De Rooij DG, et al. Cell-specific knockout of steroidogenic factor 1 reveals its essential roles in gonadal function. Mol Endocrinol. 2004;18:1610–1619
Johnson JO, Mandrioli J, Benatar M, Abramzon Y, Van Deerlin VM, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Exome sequencing reveals VCP mutations as a cause of familial ALS. Neuron. 2010;68:857–864
Kalay E, Yigit G, Aslan Y, Brown KE, Pohl E, Bicknell LS, et al. CEP152 is a genome maintenance protein disrupted in Seckel syndrome. Nat Genet. 2011;43:23–26
Köhler B, Lin L, Mazen I, Cetindag C, Biebermann H, Akkurt I, Rossi R, et al. The spectrum of phenotypes associated with mutations in steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1, NR5A1, Ad4BP) includes severe penoscrotal hypospadias in 46, XY males without adrenal insufficiency. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161:237–242
Krawitz PM, Schweiger MR, Rödelsperger C, Marcelis C, Kölsch U, Meisel C, et al. Identity-by-descent filtering of exome sequence data identifies PIGV mutations in hyperphosphatasia mental retardation syndrome. Nat Genet. 2010;42:827–829
Kuo CT, Morrisey EE, Anandappa R, Sigrist K, Lu MM, Parmacek MS, et al. GATA4 transcription factor is required for ventral morphogenesis and heart tube formation. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1048–1060
Lin L, Achermann JC. Steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1, Ad4BP, NR5A1) and disorders of testis development. Sex Dev. 2008;2:200–209
Lourenço D, Brauner R, Lin L, De Perdigo A, Weryha G, Muresan M, et al. Mutations in NR5A1 associated with ovarian insufficiency. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1200–1210
Lourenço D, Brauner R, Rybczynska M, Nihoul-Fékété C, McElreavey K, Bashamboo A. Loss-of-function mutation in GATA4 causes anomalies of human testicular development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:1597–1602
Luo X, Ikeda Y, Parker KL. A cell-specific nuclear receptor is essential for adrenal and gonadal development and sexual differentiation. Cell. 1994;77:481–490
Mandel H, Shemer R, Borochowitz ZU, Okopnik M, Knopf C, Indelman M, et al. SERKAL syndrome: an autosomal-recessive disorder caused by a loss-of-function mutation in WNT4. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:39–47
McElreavey K, Cortes LS. X-Y translocations and sex differentiation. Semin Reprod Med. 2001;19:133–139
McElreavey K, Rappaport R, Vilain E, Abbas N, Richaud F, Lortat-Jacob S, et al. A minority of 46, XX true hermaphrodites are positive for the Y-DNA sequence including SRY. Hum Genet. 1992;90:121–125
McKernan KJ, Peckham HE, Costa GL, McLaughlin SF, Fu Y, Tsung EF, et al. Sequence and structural variation in a human genome uncovered by short-read, massively parallel ligation sequencing using two-base encoding. Genome Res. 2009;19:1527–1541
Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies – the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:31–46
Miyamoto Y, Taniguchi H, Hamel F, Silversides DW, Viger RS. A GATA4/WT1 cooperation regulates transcription of genes required for mammalian sex determination and differentiation. BMC Mol Biol. 2008;9:44
Molkentin JD, Lin Q, Duncan SA, Olson EN. Requirement of the transcription factor GATA4 for heart tube formation and ventral morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1061–1072
Morohashi K, Honda S, Inomata Y, Handa H, Omura T. A common trans-acting factor, Ad4-binding protein, to the promoters of steroidogenic P-450s. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:17913–17919
Morohashi K, Iida H, Nomura M, Hatano O, Honda S, Tsukiyama T, et al. Functional difference between Ad4BP and ELP, and their distributions in steroidogenic tissues. Mol Endocrinol. 1994;8:643–653
Nemer G, Fadlalah F, Usta J, Nemer M, Dbaibo G, Obeid M, et al. A novel mutation in the GATA4 gene in patients with Tetralogy of Fallot. Hum Mutat. 2006;27:293–294
Nishida H, Miyagawa S, Vieux-Rochas M, Morini M, Ogino Y, Suzuki K, et al. Positive regulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene expression through the interaction between Dlx and GATA-4 for testicular steroidogenesis. Endocrinology. 2008;149:2090–2097
Otto EA, Hurd TW, Airik R, Chaki M, Zhou W, Stoetzel C, et al. Candidate exome capture identifies mutation of SDCCAG8 as the cause of a retinal-renal ciliopathy. Nat Genet. 2010;42:840–850
Parma P, Radi O, Vidal V, Chaboissier MC, Dellambra E, Valentini S, et al. R-spondin1 is essential in sex determination, skin differentiation and malignancy. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1304–1309
Patient RK, McGhee JD. The GATA family (vertebrates and invertebrates). Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002;12:416–422
Pearlman A, Loke J, Le Caignec C, White S, Chin L, Friedman A, et al. Mutations in MAP3K1 cause 46, XY disorders of sex development and implicate a common signal transduction pathway in human testis determination. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;87:898–904
Pierce SB, Walsh T, Chisholm KM, Lee MK, Thornton AM, Fiumara A, et al. Mutations in the DBP-deficiency protein HSD17B4 cause ovarian dysgenesis, hearing loss, and ataxia of Perrault Syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;87:282–288
Pitteloud N, Quinton R, Pearce S, Raivio T, Acierno J, Dwyer A, et al. Digenic mutations account for variable phenotypes in idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:457–463
Porter FD. Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16:535–541
Robinson MJ, Cobb MH. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:180–186
Schlessinger D, Garcia-Ortiz JE, Forabosco A, Uda M, Crisponi L, Pelosi E. Determination and stability of gonadal sex. J Androl. 2010;31:16–25
Sekido R, Lovell-Badge R. Sex determination involves synergistic action of SRY and SF1 on a specific Sox9 enhancer. Nature. 2008;453:930–934
Sekido R, Lovell-Badge R. Sex determination and SRY: down to a wink and a nudge? Trends Genet. 2009;25:19–29
Skakkebaek NE, Jørgensen N, Main KM, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Leffers H, Andersson AM, et al. Is human fecundity declining? Int J Androl. 2006;29:2–11
Sultan C, Biason-Lauber A, Philibert P. Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome: recent clinical and genetic findings. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25:8–11
Sutton E, Hughes J, White S, Sekido R, Tan J, Arboleda V, et al. Identification of SOX3 as an XX male sex reversal gene in mice and humans. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:328–341
Temel SG, Gulten T, Yakut T, Saglam H, Kilic N, Bausch E, et al. Extended pedigree with multiple cases of XX sex reversal in the absence of SRY and of a mutation at the SOX9 locus. Sex Dev. 2007;1:24–34
Tevosian SG, Albrecht KH, Crispino JD, Fujiwara Y, Eicher EM, Orkin SH. Gonadal differentiation, sex determination and normal Sry expression in mice require direct interaction between transcription partners GATA4 and FOG2. Development. 2002;129:4627–4634
Tomita-Mitchell A, Maslen CL, Morris CD, Garg V, Goldmuntz E. GATA4 sequence variants in patients with congenital heart disease. J Med Genet. 2007;44:779–783
Tomizuka K, Horikoshi K, Kitada R, Sugawara Y, Iba Y, Kojima A, et al. Rspondin1 plays an essential role in ovarian development through positively regulating Wnt-4 signaling. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:1278–1291
Tremblay JJ, Robert NM, Viger RS. Modulation of endogenous GATA-4 activity reveals its dual contribution to Müllerian inhibiting substance gene transcription in Sertoli cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2001;15:1636–1650
Uhlenhaut NH, Jakob S, Anlag K, Eisenberger T, Sekido R, Kress J, et al. Somatic sex reprogramming of adult ovaries to testes by FOXL2 ablation. Cell. 2009;139:1130–1142
Vainio S, Heikkilä M, Kispert A, Chin N, McMahon AP. Female development in mammals is regulated by Wnt-4 signalling. Nature. 1999;397:405–409
Viger RS, Mertineit C, Trasler JM, Nemer M. Transcription factor GATA-4 is expressed in a sexually dimorphic pattern during mouse gonadal development and is a potent activator of the Müllerian inhibiting substance promoter. Development. 1998;125:2665–2675
Viger RS, Guittot SM, Anttonen M, Wilson DB, Heikinheimo M. Role of the GATA family of transcription factors in endocrine development, function, and disease. Mol Endocrinol. 2008;22:781–798
Wilhelm D, Palmer S, Koopman P. Sex determination and gonadal development in mammals. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:1–28
Wilhelm D, Washburn LL, Truong V, Fellous M, Eicher EM, Koopman P. Antagonism of the testis- and ovary-determining pathways during ovotestis development in mice. Mech Dev. 2009;126:324–336
Wohlfahrt-Veje C, Main KM, Skakkebaek NE. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: foetal origin of adult reproductive problems. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;71:459–465

ambiguous genitalia; disorders of sex development; exome sequencing; gonadal dysgenesis; next generation sequencing

© 2012 Middle East Journal of Medical Genetics