Bone marrow histology and immunohistology provided no evidence for specific infiltrates of a lymphoma. X-ray of the thorax, abdominal, and lymph node sonography were unremarkable.
Laboratory investigations revealed lymphopenia of 13% (normal range 20–45%), increased lactate dehydrogenase of 5.37 μkat/L (2.25–3.75 μkat/L), elevated thymidine kinase of 6.5 U/L (0–6.1 U/L), an increased CD3/CD4 ration of 5.25 (1.0–2.3), and slightly elevated percentages of CD7+ cells of 82% (49–75%), CD20+ cells of 14.0% (2–12%), and HLA-DR+ cells with 19.0% (0–12%).
The diagnosis of CCL, composed of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (NOS) and follicular B cell lymphoma, pT2N1M0B0, stage IIA was confirmed.
The patient was classified for prognosis by Prognostic Index for PCTL-NOS (PIT).[11] The patient was older than 60 years of life and laboratory analysis demonstrated increased LDH. Performance status was 0; bone marrow involvement had been excluded. This resulted in PIT group 3 with an estimated 5-year survival rate of 32.9%.
Treatment and course: After complete surgical excision of the 3 tumor nodes, a relapse occurred after 3 months with nodules on the left malleolus medialis, scrotum, and mons pubis. These lesions were biopsied. Histopathologic examination proved the primary diagnosis. As he had enlarged lymph nodes in the left groin, 2 lymph nodes had been taken for restaging. In both nodes, T-cell infiltrates of the NOS lymphoma could be identified with polymorphous T lymphocytes that strongly expressed CD3 and CD4 but were negative for CD10 with multiple CD8+ cells intermingled with some plasma cells and PAX5+ B lymphocytes. The proliferation rate as measured by Ki67-labeling was high (> 70%).
Computerized tomography (CT) disclosed enlarged lymph nodes in the groins of both sides.
The case was discussed in the interdisciplinary tumor board. Because of the dominant T-cell component in the composite lymphoma systemic and due to the pre-existent cardiovascular risk factors and co-morbidities, PLE-DOXO was recommended due to lower cardiotoxicity and higher drug concentrations in skin.
The treatment with PLE-DOXO 20 mg/m2 was initiated in September 2014 and performed every 3 weeks.[5] The patient received premedication with ondansetron 8 mg per session. A total of 6 treatment cycles was performed. After the 3rd PLE-DOXO therapy, skin lesions became regressive. No signs of lymph node involvement were observed except for both groins with enlarged nodes of 2.3 × 3.3 cm and 2.5 × 2.2 cm, respectively. After 6 cycles of PLE-DOXO, the cutaneous lymphoma lesions completely disappeared. Inguinal lymph node involvement was stable and no further progression of disease had been observed.
The patient was discussed in the interdisciplinary tumor board again. Radiotherapy for the inguinal lymph nodes was recommended. Radiotherapy was performed with a linear accelerator and a total dose of 36 Gy in January and February 2015. At the end of this treatment, a new perianal tumor mass had developed. That was followed by cutaneous lesions in groins, gluteal, and on his left foot with tumors and plaques (Fig. 4). He received a combined chemotherapy in the oncology outpatient clinic with gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and bendamustine. After 2 chemotherapy cycles, he developed a severe leukopenia. Chemotherapy had to be interrupted and recombinant granulocyte growth factor (Filgrastim®) was given s.c. with a daily dosage of 48 mio U for 5 days. On the last day, he was sent to the emergency department because of fever, general malaise, and an acute generalized pruriginous erythema. We treated the patient with systemic (starting dose 100 mg/d) and topical corticosteroids and desloratidin 3 × 5 mg/d. With 1 week, a complete remission of the acute rash was achieved. Our working diagnosis was Filgrastim®-induced exanthema with fever. A DRESS-syndrome was not confirmed, as eosinophils were not increased. In April and May, chemotherapy was intensified to CHOEP q 14 (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisolone – 14 days cycle). Due to further progress, the protocol was changed in June 2015 to bendamustine, etoposide, and pixantrone until July 2015. He developed fever. The pneumonia was diagnosed and treated by systemic antibiosis. The lymph node involvement was progressive with enlargement of axillary, mediastinal, iliacal, and retroperitoneal involvement.
Safety: During PLE-DOXO therapy the patient was monitored by regular laboratory investigations and electrocardiography (ECG). Treatment was well tolerated. The performance status was 0–1 during the whole time of PLE-DOXO. No major toxicities were observed neither in the laboratory nor by ECG. The treatment had been given continuously without any interruption. The wounds in the left groin and on the left foot needed a revision due to delayed wound healing in October 2014. The patient developed a papular rash in November 2014 treated by topical corticosteroids. We observed palmo-plantar hyperkeratosis on erythematous skin diagnosed as hand–foot syndrome (palmo-plantar dysesthesia) that was treated by topical ointment containing urea 10%. After the 6th PLE-DOXO treatment, he developed a papulo-macular rash treated with topical prednicarbate ointment.
During polychemotherapy toxicities, grade 3 and 4 were observed. Bone marrow toxicity needed intensified application of GMCSF. Skin toxicity needed hospitalization. Severe infection (pneumonia) occurred. Performance status deteriorated from 0–1 to 3 and temporary to 4. Although an initial response of cutaneous lesions was noted in February 2015, the disease progressed to stage T3N3B0M0 (Stage IVB). He died in August 2015 due to pneumonia and aggressive lymphoma.
Overall survival was 28 months. Progression-free survival after PLE-DOXO initiation was 5 months. There was no progression-free survival thereafter.
3 Discussion
CCL are very rare cutaneous malignancies. In a series of 1200 cutaneous lymphoproliferative diseases, only 15 cases of CCL could be identified.[3] Our patient suffered from a combination of PTCL-NOS and FBCCL. PTCL-NOS is the most common subtype of PTCL that runs an aggressive course.[12] FBCCL is an indolent lymphoma with good prognosis.[13,14]
Negative prognostic factors for PCTL-NOS include peripheral neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, high tumor proliferative index (Ki67), age > 60 years of life, poor performance status, bone marrow involvement, and increased LDH.[15] Increased thymidine kinase serum levels are a marker of aggressive lymphomas.[16] Our patient had a high proliferative index, increased LDH, and was > 60 years of life. Serum thymidine kinase was only slightly increased. Lymphopenia was present from the beginning. For such patients, a median overall survival of 7.6 months has been calculated.[17] Lymphopenia, on the other side, will have a negative impact on the response to classical DOXO-based chemotherapies.[17]
Treatment of PCTL-NOS is not well standardized due to the rareness of this disease. Indeed PCTL-NOS is the rarest type of CTCL.[18] CHOP regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, DOXO, vincristine, and prednisolone has been used in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas including PTCL-NOS. In a retrospective trial including 56 patients with PTCL-NOS, DOXO has been compared to pirarubicin, a less cardiotoxic DOXO-derivate, as part of CHOP. Complete remission rates in both groups were identical with 52%. The 3-year overall survival was in favor of pirarubicin-CHOP, that is, 67% versus 52% for DOXO-CHOP. The 3-year progression-free survival for pirarubicin-CHOP was 75% versus 33% with DOXO-CHOP.[19] The 5-year survival rate with CHOP is only 19% in PCTL-NOS.[20] Adjuvant radiation therapy to DOXO-based chemotherapy in early stage PCTL-NOS may improve the 3-year survival significantly, that is, 49.7% versus 23.1% (DOXO-based chemotherapy alone).[21]
Gemcitabine, cisplatin, dexamethasone regimen as salvage therapy of relapsed or refractory PTCL (n = 25) resulted in a complete response in 48% and in partial response in 24%. Progression-free media survival was 9.3 months.[23] Patients with relapse or progression have a poor outcome despite chemotherapy or radiotherapy.[22]
CHOP and other polychemotherapy regimens such as DOXO, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone or gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, bendamustine, and so on, may result in significant toxicities without improvement of overall survival.[12,22]
In contrast, PLE-DOXO has a favorable safety profile with proven efficacy in CTCL in particular at a dosage of 20 mg/m2.[5–9] This is the first case report on PLE-DOXO as initial chemotherapy in PCTL-NOS. In a patient with PIT risk group 3, a stable disease with complete response of cutaneous lesions could be achieved. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. The treatment was well tolerated. Palmo-plantar dysesthesia, however, is a common adverse effects observed in about 50% of patients. Overall survival was about 4 times of the median survival of grade 3 PTCL-NOS with 28 months.[11] Despite escalating polychemotherapy, no remission or further progression-free survival could be achieved. Would the patient have been benefited from a second PLE-DOXO course alike MF patients? We do not know. Further investigations for an optimal treatment algorithm are needed.
4 Conclusions
We report a case of a 73-year-old male patient who presented with painful cutaneous nodules identified by histology and immunohistology as CCL composed of PTCL-NOS and FCBCL. We obtained a stable disease with complete remission of cutaneous lesions during 6 cycles of low-dose PEL-DOXO every 3 weeks. The use of PEG-DOXO has yet not been described for this entity although controlled and uncontrolled trials documented clinical efficacy for MF and Sézary syndrome and even in CBCL. Whether escalating polychemotherapy provides benefits for such patients in sense of quality of life, relapse-free, and overall survival has yet not been proven. Further studies are needed to substantiate the positive impression of this well-tolerated treatment in CCL with PTCL-NOS and FCBCL.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Prof. Lorenzo Cerroni (Graz, Austria) for second opinion on the pathologic specimen. Photography Department (Mrs. Ramona Herz) is acknowledged for assistance in preparing the images for the manuscript.
References
1. Olsen EA, Whittaker S, Kim YH, et al. Clinical end points and response criteria in Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a consensus statement of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas, the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium, and the Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:2598–2607.
2. Wanczinsnki MI, Pinto CA, Trevisan F, et al. Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma simulating basal-cell carcinoma on the nasal ala.
An Bras Dermatol 2015; 90 (suppl 1):111–114.
3. Kazakov DV, Kutzner H, Palmedo G, et al. Primary cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders with dual lineage rearrangement.
Am J Dermatopathol 2006; 28:399–409.
4. Wollina U. Liposomal cancer chemotherapy in dermatology: current status and future prospects.
Indian J Dermatol 2004; 49:109–116.
5. Wollina U, Dummer R, Brockmeyer NH, et al. Multicenter study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Cancer 2003; 98:993–1001.
6. Di Lorenzo G, Di Trolio R, Delfino M, et al. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in stage IVB mycosis fungoides.
Br J Dermatol 2005; 153:183–185.
7. Pulini S, Rupoli S, Goteri G, et al. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas.
Haematologica 2007; 92:686–689.
8. Quereux G, Marques S, Nguyen JM, et al. Prospective multicenter study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin treatment in patients with advanced or refractory mycosis fungoides or Sezary syndrome.
Arch Dermatol 2008; 144:727–733.
9. Straus DJ, Duvic M, Horwitz SM, et al. Final results of phase II trial of doxorubicin HCl liposome injection followed by bexarotene in advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Ann Oncol 2014; 25:206–210.
10. Pulini S, Rupoli S, Goteri G, et al. Efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas and comparison with the commonly used therapies.
Eur J Haematol 2009; 82:184–193.
11. Gallamini A, Stelitano C, Calvi R, et al. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma unspecified (PTCL-U): a new prognostic model from a retrospective multicentric clinical study.
Blood 2004; 103:2474–2479.
12. Aderhold K, Carpenter L, Brown K, et al. Primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified: a rapidly progressive variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Case Rep Oncol Med 2015; 2015:429068.
13. Suárez AL, Pulitzer M, Horwitz S, et al. Primary cutaneous B cell lymphomas. Part I. Clinical features, diagnosis and classification.
J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 69:329.e1–329.e13.
14. Suárez AL, Querfeld C, Horwitz S, et al. Primary cutaneous B cell lymphomas. Part II. Therapy and future directions.
J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 69:343.e1–343.e11.
15. Xu P, Yu D, Wang L, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors and comparison of prognostic scores in peripheral T cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: a single-institution study of 105 Chinese patients.
Ann Hematol 2015; 94:239–247.
16. Gatt ME, Goldschmidt N, Kalichman I, et al. Thymidine kinase levels correlate with prognosis in aggressive lymphoma and can discriminate patients with a clinical suspicion of indolent to aggressive transformation.
Anticancer Res 2015; 35:3019–3026.
17. Kim YR, Kim JS, Kim SJ, et al. Lymphopenia is an important prognostic factor in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (NOS) treated with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.
J Hematol Oncol 2011; 4:34.
18. Kempf W, Rozati S, Kerl K, et al. Cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphomas, unspecified/NOS and rare subtypes: a heterogeneous group of challenging cutaneous lymphomas.
G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2012; 147:553–562.
19. Shibata Y, Hara T, Kasahara S, et al. CHOP or THP-COP regimens in the treatment of newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: a comparison of doxorubicin and pirarubicin.
Hematol Oncol 2015; Oct 9. doi: 10.1002/hon.2262. [Epub ahead of print].
20. Lage LA, Cabral TC, Costa Rde O, et al. Primary nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas: diagnosis and therapeutic considerations.
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2015; 37:277–284.
21. Zhang XM, Li YX, Wang WH, et al. Survival advantage with the addition of radiation therapy to chemotherapy in early stage peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 85:1051–1056.
22. Park BB, Kim WS, Suh C, et al. Salvage chemotherapy of gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) for patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas: a consortium for improving survival of lymphoma (CISL) trial.
Ann Hematol 2015; 94:1845–1851.
23. Mak V, Hamm J, Chhanabhai M, et al. Survival of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma after first relapse or progression: spectrum of disease and rare long-term survivors.
J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:1970–1976.
Keywords: combined cutaneous lymphoma; follicular cutaneous B-Cell lymphoma; pegylated liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin; peripheral T-Cell lymphoma – not otherwise specified; polychemotherapy
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Source
Medicine. 95(43):e4796, October 2016.
Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.
Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.
The item(s) has been successfully added to "".